No - HKUST Institutional Repository
Transkrypt
No - HKUST Institutional Repository
Analyze and Improve Your Citation Counts Library-VPRDO Joint Workshop for Faculty & Research Staff Presenters: Mr. Ken Cheng (Program Manager, Knowledge Transfer) Ms. Victoria Caplan (Subject Librarian for SS) Ms. Diana Chan (Associate University Librarian) Date: December 8, 2009 Venue: HKUST Library Analyze & Improve Your Citation Counts December 8, 2009 Presented by 2 Victoria Caplan [email protected] Diana Chan [email protected] Learning Objectives 1. Learn about New Search Tools & Techniques Scopus GoogleScholar & Publish or Perish™ open source software GoogleBooks Proquest Web of Science (Social Science Citation Index) 2. Recent Developments in HSS Bibliometrics 3 Scopus - Search Scopus (1996-) = ~18,000 titles • Has ~ 2,760 Social Science titles (all of ISI’s) • As of 2009 ~3,500 Arts & Humanities titles Author Search- Lee, James Z Affiliations CalTech Univ. Michigan Results 5 docs & 19 citations Citation report 4 Scopus Demo (2) 5 Google Scholar – Advanced Search Author Search Author search for “JZ Lee” & Limit to HSS Contents: = Mystery box “…articles, theses, books, abstracts, court opinions and other scholarly literature from all broad areas of research. …from a wide variety of academic publishers and professional societies, as well as scholarly articles available across the web.” 6 ~ 27 docs, cited ~ 320 Author search for “James Z Lee” & no limit ~ 40 docs, cited ~ 370 Author search for “李中清” ~ 35 docs, cited 55 times Author search for ZL Lu – ~3,000+ science papers in many disciplines Author search for 呂宗力 = 5 documents, cited 80 times Publish or Perish® with GoogleScholar http://www.harzing.com/pop.htm Designed to help individual academics present their case for research impact Better for Social Sciences than for Humanities & At moment, no 中文 7 Uses Google Scholar to obtain raw citations, then analyzes them & presents statistics: •Total number of papers • Total number of citations • Average number of citations per paper • Average number of citations per author • Average number of citations per year • Etc., etc., etc. Google Scholar Advanced Search Phrase Search “Lee, James Z” as phrase = 81 docs “Lee JZ” as phrase = ~100 docs - but some are the urologist’s 李中清 as a phrase = 184 docs “Lu Zongli” as a phrase = 17 Searched “Lu ZL” as a phrase = ~3,670 docs almost all wrong Searched 呂宗力 as phrase = 27 docs 8 GoogleBooks - Advanced Search Phrase Search Searching Lee, James Z. as a phrase = 169 Searched李中清 as a phrase = 417 Searching Lu Zongli in GoogleBooks as a phrase = 71 呂宗力 in GoogleBooks as a phrase = 305 9 Warning: Can be Slow & Tedious to sort through Proquest - Search name as full-text, to see if it appears in bibliography Lee, James Z as a phrase search = 20 documents mostly to PhD theses 10 “Lu, Zongli” as a phrase search = 6 docs (5 OK) all citations in PhD theses This “mining” is also slow and not quite as rewarding as GoogleBooks Web of Science - ISI Indexes: SSCI & A&H CI Social Science Citation Index (1991-) (covers 2,759 journals) Mediocre for some Social Sciences Faculty members, & poor for others Quite bad in the Humanities Example: Only 2 citations for Dr. James Z. Lee Some senior members of HSS had NO Listings Arts & Humanities Citation Index (covers 1,516 journals) About the same (if not worse) Example: Only 1 article found for Dr. James Z Lee Other senior members had results like this: 4 articles found, no cites listed 1 article found, no cites 0 articles, 0 cites 11 Refer to hand-out for sampling of journal coverage Social Science Citation Index Author Search Lee, JZ Found 3 Only 2 correct 12 Social Science Citation Index Cited Reference Search Cited Ref search for Lee, JZ • 37 docs • Cited 100 times • 50 FALSE hits Biggest false hit generator (41 citations): 13 Lee SD, Sohn DW, Lee JZ, Park NC, Chung MK (2000). An epidemiological study of enuresis in Korean children. British Journal of Urology International, 85(7), pp. 869-873. Searching Comparisons Author Web of Science Scopus Proquest Google Scholar Google Books Author A 2 docs, cited 5 5 docs, cited 19 20 hits 144 articles, cited 427 170 hits Author B 0 0 5 hits Chinese name 12 docs, 77 cites Chinese name 306 hits English name 4 docs, 3 cites English name = ~70 hits 107 docs cited 965 ~343 hits Author C 14 26 docs, cited 71 23 docs, cited 158 ~ 80 hits Database Availability at HKUST 15 Major Databases Here at HKUST Useful ? Social Sciences Citation Index (1991-) - 1,900 journals Yes OK for scholars in Economics or Psychology, less so for historians, anthropologists, etc. Arts & Humanities Index No Not very useful Scopus (1996-) Yes OK for Econ & Psych; increasing coverage in the humanities GoogleScholar Open Access Yes, but must be mined manually GoogleBooks Open Access Yes, but must be mined manually Proquest Yes Yes, but must be mined Chinese Citation Database (中國引文數據庫) No Have not evaluated 2) Recent Developments in HSS Bibliometrics The 4 Literatures of HSS - International Peer Reviewed Articles - Books - National Literatures (non-English) - Enlightenment literature Other tools and methods - LibCitations - Linmans’ Proposals 16 Part 2 - The Issue: “Just” Publishing Isn’t Enough Anymore 17 Mischa Richter. Licensed from the www.catoonbank.com Aug 14, 2009 Citation Counting Concerns & Issues in HSS “Bibliometric evaluation in the social science is possible. However, if done correctly, it is messy, complex, and expensive” - Hicks (2006) “[G]iven the specific nature of the Humanities, the indicators… will most of the time not be a mere copy of existing science indicators. - Linmans (2009) 18 The Four Literatures of Social Science* 1. International Journal Articles 2. Books 3. National Journals (non-English language) 4. Enlightenment Publications (”popular” press & media) - Hicks (2004) * 19 And Humanities? International Peer Reviewed articles 1st literature of social sciences (less so in Humanities) • Internationally oriented • Peer reviewed journal articles • English language (most often) Need a decade-long window to examine Social Science Literature (Glanzel, cited in Hicks 2006). Interdisciplinary work makes scattered citation patters 79% of Science papers referenced other ISI journal papers Only 45% of the Social science papers referenced other ISI papers - Leydesdorff ( cited in Hicks 2006) 20 Books = High Impact Books are more cited than journal articles 3:1 or as high as 6:1 20 most highly cited articles averaged ~55 citations 20 most cited books ranged up to 512 citations Sociology Example: Most cited books received 79% of citations from OUTSIDE of sociology Most cited articles received 55% of citations from OUTSIDE Sociology (Hicks 2006) Neither books nor articles can be ignored 21 Books often = Tenure & Promotion “So, fair or not, the basic standard for tenure on my campus is two books.” - (Schmidt 2007) “The book is clearly required for promotion and tenure in the humanities and social science disciplines “ - (Estabrook 2004) from a study done with faculty members in 18 institutions of CIC 22 Books – a study at HKU Physics dept.’s output: 99% Music Dept’s output: 11% = journal articles, = journal articles Books, monographs, & book chapters • Sociology, • Education • Philosophy • Linguistics • Comparative Literature > journal articles in these depts. No Natural Science department produced a book in those years 23 - (Huang & Chang 2008) Non-English Language material “National Literatures” “Each national literature is a world unto itself ”.” English language sociology = ~ 70% of literature in the area English & US sociologists cited English language material 99% of the time German & French language sociology = 10% of literature in the area German & French sociologists cited own language material 60% of the time Things are changing: Slow Convergence: 1980-2000 Norwegian social scientists citation of English language journals increased from 33% to 50% 24 Enlightenment Literature “Popular or “Enlightenment” writing & media presentations Contributions to “public debate” = Newspapers, magazines, news shows, etc. In Norway, twice as many social scientists do it than scientists English Linguistics, Education, & sociology lead in share of popular literature Some think that these publications might also need to be counted to show a true picture of a scholar’s productivity. 25 Other possible tools: LibCitations New method (2009 article) Count the no. of libraries holding a given book as reported in a national or international union catalog (WorldCat) Count its holdings pattern in comparison to other books in class no. Measures can be then derived to compare different departments (in different universities) for cultural impact Political Advantage = makes Humanities & Social Sciences authors look better, especially those who don’t show up well in ISI Thomson or Scopus databases Problem = Can make other departments look bad 26 Another Idea – Linmans’ Proposals 3- Level approach: citations, library holdings, & productivity Citations = Not citation per publication, but citation per author Looking at Library holdings of books (including WorldCat) – help overcome Anglo-American bias of WOS Look at lifetime productivity instead of shorter window sometimes suggested by Hirsch Linmans (2009) 27 Conclusion - One Source of Citations Is Not Enough International Peer Reviewed Articles • Use SSCI, Scopus & Google Scholar • Use other commercial Databases like Proquest, Ebsco, etc. Books • Do manual searching of SSCI to for books • Do manual searching of GoogleBooks, GoogleScholar • Do manual searching of citation databases like Proquest & Ebsco, National Literatures Try searching names of authors as “full text” in National databases (e.g. CAJ) Newspapers, Magazines, & other Enlightenment literature Consider listing your contributions to newspapers and magazines & videos Or consider list them as “service” activities 28 Bibliometrics in HSS: Fun, but…. “Humanists, who are quite used to merciless criticism in essay form, may someday have to decide whether it is worse to have their hearts broken qualitatively or quantitatively.” -White, et al. (2009) 29 References Estabrook, Leigh. (2004). Book Publication as the Gold Standard for Tenure & Promotion, a presentation given at the 144th Membership Meeting of the Association for Research Libraries, Tucson Arizona, May 14, 2004. Accessed 3 December 2009 from http://www.arl.org/arldocs/resources/pubs/mmproceedings/144/estabrook_files/estabrook.ppt. Harzing, A.K.and Wal, R.D. (2008) “Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, Vol.8: p. 61-73. Hicks, Diana (2004). The Four Literatures of Social Science. In: H.F. Moed et al. (eds.), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, Chapter 21, p. , 473-496. ---- (2006) The Dangers of Partial Bibliometric Evaluation in the Social Sciences, Economia Politica23 (2) August, pp. 145-162. Accessed 12 nov 2009 from http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1008&context=diana_hicks Hicks, Diana; Wang, Jian. (2009). Towards a Bibliometric Database for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Accessed 12 November 2009 at http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1017&context=diana_hicks Huang, Mu-hsuan; Chang, Yu-wei. 2008. Characteristics of Research Output in Social Sciences and Humanities: from a Research Evaluation Perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11), p. 1819-1828. Kousha, Kyavan; Thelwall, Mike. 2009. Google Book Search: Citation Analysis for Social Science and the Humanities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60 (8):1537-1549. Linmans, A. J.M. (2009). Why with bibliometrics the Humanities does not need to be the weakest link. Scientometrics, published online 13 August 2009. Accessed 15 November from SpringerLink database. Moed, Henk. F. , Glänzel, Wolfgang, Schmoch, Ulrich (eds.). (2004) Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. Dordrecht: Springer, doi 10.1007/s11192-009-0088-9 Moed, Henk F. (2005). “Differences Between Science, Social Sciences and Humanities” in Chapter 9, Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer. Schmidt, Thomas, (2007). How Not to Write a Second Book. Chronicle of Higher Education, March 30, 2007. Retrieved from Ebsco Database 3 December 2009. White, Howard D., Boell, Sebastian K.;Yu, Hairong; Davis, Mari; Wilson, Concepcion S.; Cole, Fletcher, T.H. (2009). LibCitations: A Measure for Comparative Assessment of Book Publications in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(6):1083-1096. 30