THE VIRGIN MARY IN 19TH- AND 20TH
Transkrypt
THE VIRGIN MARY IN 19TH- AND 20TH
289 Etnografia Polska vol. XXXII, 1988, book 1 PL ISSN 0071-1861 ZOFIA SOKOLEWICZ (Katedra Etnologii i Antropologii Kulturowej UW) THE VIRGIN MARY IN 19TH- AND 20TH-CENTURY POLISH FOLK CULTURE (SELECTED SOURCE ISSUES AND QUESTIONS WHICH ARISE) Certain facts have begun to emerge from the increasingly more numerous and extensive studies of religiosity, including folk religiosity; facts related to the Marian cult and its huge significance in the lives of local, regional and national communities and for various professional and artistic groups. However, an analysis of this essentially religious phenomenon presents certain difficulties; primarily due to the fact that it appears in a wide variety of forms, including ones of a para-religious, customary or magical nature. Based on the various works published on the topic up until now, it seems that the Virgin Mary is present in many domains of Polish folk culture, as can be demonstrated by various initial comparative research conducted, and the situation is similar in other Slavic countries and even in European ones. The very interesting text by Maria Frankowska, entitled Sanktuaria i pielgrzymki — ich rola w procesie ewangelizacji Indian Meksyku oraz kształtowania się miejscowego synkretyzmu religijnego (1986), which devotes a lot of space to the Marian cult, can be seen as proof that this phenomenon is also present in similar cultural contexts, not only outside of Poland but outside of Europe, in almost the entire Christian world. In this outline, I would like to indicate some of the types of ethnographic sources concerning the cult and – more broadly – the Virgin Mary, and the related issues of source criticism, as well as to suggest a series of research questions which emerge from such an analysis of the source material. Maryja (Mary), Bogurodzica (Theotokos, the one who gave birth to God), Matka Boska1 (the Mother of God), Królowa Niebios (the Queen of the Heavens, Przenajświętsza Panienka (the Most Holy Lady), Przeczysta (the Most Pure), Najświętsza (the Holiest)…— these are the names under which she most often appears in Polish folk culture. The terms “Maryja” and “Bogurodzica” seem to encompass the others. It is these terms in fact which most often appear as the main entries in encyclopaedias and indexes containing lists of academic articles. 1 This phrase seems to be the one most often used in Poland – editor’s note. 290 In the fundamental position for ethnographers, Handwörterbuch des deutschen Aberglaubens, we can find the entry “Maria [St.]”. The situation is similar in most church encyclopaedias and dictionaries, such as Biblejskij Slovar, as well as in the important Soviet work Mify narodov mira. The Srpski mitoloshki rechnik contains a very short entry for “Bogurodica”. This was also the term chosen by the index of the second volume of Kultura ludowa Słowian by K. Moszyński (1967), devoted to spiritual culture. In the above-mentioned encyclopaedic approaches, the entries for “Maria” and “Bogurodzica” differ in terms of the content structuring. On this basis, they can be divided into two groups. The first would include those for which the point of departure is in principle Mary and which limit themselves to depicting the life history of the evangelic Mary, who stems from the line of David and is the mother of Jesus. These entries take into account apocrypha, telling the history of her cult within the Church, as well as mentioning the basic iconographic motifs and listing the most important works of art devoted to her. The second group, for which the point of departure is more often the entry “Bogurodzica” than that of “Maria”, encompasses those entries, where the authors almost exclusively refer to folk culture, to the almost complete exclusion (Srpski mitoloshki rechnik) of historical and religious information. Against this background, the Handwörterbuch des deutschen Aberglaubens is of an exceptional nature, as it contains both types of information, similarly as is the case with the entry “Mary (Virgin)”, published in the Encyclopaedia of Religion and Ethics (1926). The lack of any entry for “Maria” or “Matka Boska” in the dictionary Słownik folkloru polskiego should be mentioned, and it can be read as a show of restraint on the part of folklorists in discussing the topic, as well as a sign of the difficulties connected to the writing of such an entry, resulting at the very least from the presence of the Virgin Mary in many domains of folk culture. However, in the classification of plots in folk tales (Krzyżanowski 1963, II), we come across Marian legends and those about the baby Jesus in the etiological tales section, marked with the numbers T 2441 to T 2445. Krzyżanowski devoted much more space to this group in his classification in comparison to the classification prepared by Aarne-Thompson, simultaneously explaining that such plots are rare in Protestant and Orthodox countries. It is difficult for me to give my opinion about this first issue – of the rarity of such plots in Protestant culture. Krzyżanowski’s statement seems logical in light of Protestant theology. I do not, however, have enough knowledge of the empirical material on folk culture from Protestant areas and other reformed churches, thus I can only rely on Krzyżanowski’s authority and the above-mentioned Aarne and Thompson, but it can be expected that even on this issue further research will lead to a modification of Krzyżanowski’s thesis, at least in relation to some areas (e.g. Protestant Masurians), as has been indicated by the research conducted in the Olsztyn centre (Nowak 1986). In the case of the culture of Orthodox regions, the research into these areas seems to contradict Krzyżanowski’s suggestion, as can be testified to by various material pertaining to the territory of Belarus (Federowski 1897-1903), Serbia (the opinion of P. Vlahovic given during a conversation), Croatia (Bielaj), Bulgaria (Georgieva 1983). Additionally, many of the Polish plots were labelled in such a way that their connections to the Virgin Mary disappear, and – which is no small matter – the Marian threads in the tales which Krzyżanowski takes into consideration do not exhaust all of the material in existence in Poland, even if we were to limit ourselves only to the Catholic areas. 291 The question arises as to whether the appropriate indexation of the plots in which the Virgin Mary is present — for example, about the cancer deprived of its venom by the Virgin Mary and then designated to become food for human beings, about the sentencing of the reptile to crawl as punishment for frightening the Virgin Mary, about the spider, about the greedy woman and diminished ears of wheat, about thistle leaves stained by the milk of the Virgin Mary (Krzyżanowski 1963, II: 185, 189) and a number of others – as well as placing them all within the same group would not help us to understand why within folk tradition the name of the Virgin Mary is connected only with these specific tales and not others. This issue seems all the more significant as the fact of the interchangeability of the Virgin Mary in some of these plots with other characters (Jesus Christ, Adam, etc.) and the fact that she is connected to certain animals, plants, people, actions and not others may contribute to explaining the issue of the appearance of the Virgin Mary in folk culture from as early as the 14th century and the gradual displacement of other characters. The logic behind this process should be very interesting for researchers. For this reason, I have devoted some critical commentary to J. Krzyżanowski’s momentous work (1962, 1963) — I would like to present a slightly different reading of this text, in order to find the answer to a question the author did not pose himself. The Marian cult in folk culture is primarily the cult of Mary as the Mother of God, frequently treated as if this was the only fact that mattered; therefore her history, her biography (even the apocryphal one, thus closely tied to folk cultures) remains in the shadows. Paradoxically, it sometimes seems as if within folk culture she leads a life independent even of her son, Jesus. It is thus no accident that in the above-mentioned Srpski mitoloshki rechnik we can encounter the entry “Bogurodica” — and respectively within the index to Moszyński’s text (1967): “Bogarodzica” — both included due to the place occupied by the Virgin Mary in folk beliefs and culture. For this reason, we can find beliefs which apply only to her and which indicate her presence since the beginnings of the world (beliefs and legends connected to the origins of peas, the diminution of ears of wheat, the stopping of the flood, etc.), information about yearly and family holidays and rituals, folklore in the general sense (as knowledge and as an artistic form), as a cultural fact. It should be emphasized that in some of the general works, such as for example J.C. Cooper’s An illustrated encyclopaedia of traditional symbols, information about Mary, the Mother of Jesus, is included into the entry “Mother (Great)”. I would like to note the important theoretical question of whether Mary is one of the Great Mothers of the great religions of the world. A positive answer to this question would, however, be a misunderstanding. On the basis of G. van der Leeuw’s Phenomenology of Religion, it is possible to formulate significant differences between the Great Mothers of the old religions and Mary. Can this point of view be upheld in light of the data from folk culture, for example references to the presence of Mary during the Flood, at the very beginnings of the world? It seems so, most certainly. The Marian cult in Polish folk culture is primarily the cult of the Mother of God – it is this motherhood, and not her proto-presence from the beginnings of the world, entitles her to this cult. It is not her who was the source of everything that lives, it is not within her that everything is contained, and it is not she who holds within her the possibility of rebirth. She was the Mother, but not the Great Mother. It is with this hypothesis that I began my research, searching out arguments for and against this thesis. 292 It should however be emphasized that these two types of cults: of the Great Mothers and the Marian cult, do not constitute disjoint sets. Both contain common elements, common symbols, e.g. the symbol of the lily in the West and its equivalent in the East – the lotus flower, to give just one example. At this point, it seems appropriate to mention the great ethnologic work by W. Schmidt, one of the writers of “Kreislehre”, devoted to the subject of matriarchy (Schmidt 1955a). The author understands this concept broadly, not so much as a historical epoch, but more as the laws of the mother. The author indicates the universal nature of the laws of the mother and introduces the Marian cult into the frameworks of this law, or rather places it within these frameworks. Therefore, he emphasises what is common for these different cults (derivable from this law), putting aside anything that would constitute a specific feature of the Marian cult. However, the search for differences did not seem to have been the intention of the author – in all of his works he searched for the roots of universal laws. There are, however, few ethnographic studies devoted to the Virgin Mary and practically all of them were taken into account or at least mentioned in “Polska Sztuka Ludowa” (no. 3: 1984). A number of articles from this issue dealt with the topic of the Virgin Mary as a result of a highly interesting exhibition organized in the autumn of 1982 by the Ethnographic Museum in Cracow, entitled “Matka Boska Częstochowska w sztuce ludowej i popularnej”. As a result of a chronicler’s sense of duty, the numerous non-ethnographic but nonetheless valuable positions should be mentioned which have appeared in recent years in church publications and magazines: in “Przegląd Powszechny”, “W drodze”, “Studia Claramontana” — devoted completely to the Our Lady of Częstochowa, and finally the collective works: Gratia plena (1965) and Religijność ludowa (1983), which contain a rich bibliographical list. The state of research on the Marian cult up until 1980 was described by K. Fiedeń, MSF (1982). A large amount of new information was introduced by the papers presented at the 5th Mariological Congress in Lublin in 1986. Among these, there were also ethnographic topics presented by Rev. Z. Kopiczko, A. KunczyńskąIracką, Z. Sokolewicz, H. M. Zowczak. All of the authors drew attention to the necessity of researching sources, the possibility of the creation of new sources (induced) and the extreme difficulties connected to their critical analysis. H. M. Zowczak’s paper on the role of the Virgin Mary in contemporary stories about heroes and her being attributed with the function of mediator is a good example of the significance the sources being created now may have for the formulation of new hypotheses or the confirmation of previous ones. All of these listed works clearly show that despite the appearance of new issues and new facts about the Marian cult, we are still at the beginning of our journey. The unpublished Ph. D. thesis by J. Grąbczewski (only a small fragment has been published; Grąbczewski 1984) should be added to this list. The author focuses his attention on the relationship between beliefs and ceremonies and the Virgin Mary, as expressed in dates, names, symbols, taboos, dictates or intentions. This material attempts to introduce some order by making use of the concept of the topos and by reading into any such information some form of personification of the Virgin Mary: as the helper, the intercessor, of flora and of luna. The comparison of the results of this work with others, including non-ethnographic ones, testifies to the fact that ethnographers are only at the 293 beginning of their journey. Among the various domains of folk culture connected to the Virgin Mary, thanks to the efforts of Anna Kunczyńska-Iracka and the organizers of the afore-mentioned exhibition about Our Lady of Częstochowa, the relatively most researched section would be the artistic aspect: the representations of the Virgin Mary in art — painting, the graphic arts and sculpture (cf. also Dobrzeniecki 1965; Mroczko, Dąb 1966). I. AN ETHNOGRAPHIC ENQUIRY INTO THE AVAILABLE SOURCES The search for sources about the Virgin Mary presents more difficulties in comparison to such classical ethnographic subjects as yearly or family rituals, when it is possible to focus on quite concise issues and to rely on quite vast source material. On the other hand, the Virgin Mary is present within the whole cycle of yearly celebrations, in all family ceremonies, in beliefs, legends, stories, tales, apocrypha, proverbs, requests, objects connected to the decorations inside churches and homes, and also to iconography. She is also present in the sphere of folk religiosity in a domain not included in the above list, i.e. in material dealing with church holidays, big and small sacral architecture, votive offerings, devotional articles, etc. As a consequence, this means that there is a necessity to conduct research into practically the entire symbolic sphere of folk culture. Ethnographic sources about the Virgin Mary are numerous but very scattered. Passages which mention her role in specific yearly ceremonies or family rituals are usually short and poor in context; therefore, difficulties arise in attempts to read the information in an unambiguous way. Such sources can seldom be used to establish the history, structure and function of the Marian cult, while much more frequently giving information about folk beliefs, the specific folk theology or even magical practices. They are a reflection of the syncretism of folk beliefs. It is also often difficult to conclude on their basis anything about the level of relations between the described cultural behaviours and the figure of Mary or, more generally, Marian piety. In many similar situations, Mary appears interchangeably with other figures: Jesus Christ, one’s own mother, etc. The above-mentioned etiological tales may be seen as being an example of this. Within them, we can find that peas were created from the tears of the Virgin Mary, at other times – from Adam’s tears resulting from having lost paradise (Krzyżanowski 1963, II: 188). In songs, wedding and funeral orations and other cultural texts, we can find many more examples of such interchangeability. This is undoubtedly important information for those interested in the ways the Virgin Mary has been adapted by folk culture. It is a fact all the more worth considering as we have made this observation in reference to a field as homogeneous – according to Krzyżanowski – as etiological tales, derived from medieval apocrypha (Krzyżanowski 1962, I: 14) and seems to be consolidated by literary equivalents of apocrypha, which became a source of inspiration for sermons and treatises, which most probably spoke to the masses. Among the ethnographic sources, some can be indicated as presenting different behaviours on specified calendar dates dedicated to Mary, but which contain little information about the relationship between such a day and these behaviours. A fragment of a description by W. Szuchiewicz of Huculszczyzna may serve as an example, giving 294 the following data concerning the course of events during the 4th of December, thus the day of the Blessed Virgin Mary’s Sacrifice: “On the eve of the day, the Hutsuli sprinkle the cows with linseed and apply butter to their udders, so that the cows would give a lot of milk. After midnight, naked women sit on the threshold and spin self-sowing hemp, while during the day they begin various works, so that they would be successful during ploughing [...] around noon, they burn incense around the cows, made from cow dung and spruce branches and say «much as no-one can collect this smoke in a sack, no-one will be able to take the manna from my cow»” (Szuchiewicz 1904). I chose the above fragment to bring the reader to the realisation what a long journey awaits a researcher who would want to justify the connection of this type of behaviour with the day dedicated to the Blessed Virgin Mary. Most probably each of the signs which appear here – spinning, burning incense, beginning work – is especially often connected to the name of the Virgin Mary, while justification for the other symbols – nudity, self-sowing hemp, linseed – can be found within mythology. However, the establishment of why this specific day was chosen for this type of practices, as well as the answer to this question can be found in the analysis of the correlation between the lives of the Blessed Virgin Mary and Jesus Christ and the whole cycle of yearly ceremonies and customs, the policies of the Church in these regards and people’s reaction to it, their method of adapting everything that at a certain point in time entered culture as something new. Fundamentally, a similar question should be asked when analysing the less controversial texts dealing with, for example, behaviours during the Day of the Assumption of Mary2. Most of them cannot be explained by referring to Marian piety. Thus, the selection of sources from such a perspective constitutes a serious problem for source criticism. Many sources indicate the ties between certain behaviours and Mary in the references to her or the prayers addressed to her or the fact that she was incorporated into a church ceremony. An example of the first would be the sigh addressed by Mr Twardowski to the Virgin Mary during the last hour of his life or her being summoned by other characters, also in contemporary times (Zowczak 1986), towards whom the Blessed Virgin Mary performs the role of advocate and ancillary. An example of the second type of behaviours may be the burning of blessed wax candles on Candlemas Day3 or of herbs during the Day of the Assumption of Mary. Ethnographic sources from the 19th and 20th centuries are silent about the ways of experiencing ceremonies by people from the countryside, generally they do not quote their utterances verbatim, and often we have doubts if the information was not provoked by a question from the ethnographer. We have these same doubts up until today when we bring forth new sources. All this must influence the difficulties we encounter in separating information about religiosity from information about parareligiosity, the proof 2 The most popular name in Poland of the Day of the Assumption of Mary is The Day of Our Lady of the Herbs – editor’s note. 3 In Poland this holiday is called Święto Matki Boskiej Gromnicznej. The name refers to candles blessed on this day. The so-called gromnica (thunder) was lit during the storms to protect the household – editor’s note. 295 of mythical thinking from conventional utterances, etc., which in research on the place occupied by the Virgin Mary in folk culture is especially significant. II. THE VIRGIN MARY IN CEREMONIES OF THE YEARLY CYCLE The most important Marian holidays of a higher significance in folk culture include: 2 Feb. — the Purification of the Blessed Virgin Mary, or Our Lady of the “Blessed Thunder Candle”; 25 Mar. — the Annunciation of the Blessed Virgin Mary or Our Lady of the Opening; 2 Jul. — the Visitation of the Blessed Virgin Mary or Our Lady of the Berries; 15 Aug. — the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary or Our Lady of the Herbs; 8 Sept. — the Birth of the Blessed Virgin Mary or Our Lady of the Sowing. From among the many other days in the liturgical calendar dedicated to Mary, we should also mention the day of Our Lady of the Rosary on the first Sunday of October (also called Our Lady of the Eel and especially celebrated in the Kaszuby region). Christmas, the Epiphany and Easter should also be added to this group of holidays, as even though they are not Marian holidays, the Virgin Mary plays an important role in them. If we adopt the hypothesis of Ludwik Stomma that some yearly ceremonies have the character of transition rites, and thus are extremely important in the yearly cycle due to a person being able to participate in significant qualitative changes resulting from the nature of the cosmos, and from having a derivative social character (Stomma 1973), then we would discover that out of 17 yearly ceremonies which have such a character, 3 are connected to the figure of the Virgin Mary and are somehow dedicated to her (Our Lady of the “Blessed Thunder Candle”, Our Lady of the Opening, i.e. the Annunciation of the Blessed Virgin Mary and Our Lady of the Herbs), and three others are connected to her in significant ways (Christmas, the Epiphany and Easter). The research currently being conducted by J. S. Wasilewski on taboo categories will probably bring quite significant changes to the understanding of transition rites within the yearly cycle (Wasilewski, 1987); however, I do not think that this could influence the hypothesis that the ceremonies connected to the days of the Virgin Mary are closely related to changes in state, the nature of time and space in the cosmic cycle. The rhythm of farming, breeding, fishing, craft work and other such jobs are imposed onto the rhythm of the transition rites. For the farming cycle, the day of Our Lady of the “Blessed Thunder Candle” and then that of Our Lady of the Opening signify changes which allow for vegetation. The holiday of Our Lady of the Berries carries the mark of being the day of the purification of the fruits of the forest and their being offered in sacrifice. This is expressed through the ban introduced on the consumption of such undergrowth on this specific day. The content and the symbolism of this day can find an extension in the day of Our Lady of the Herbs, which constitutes another step in abolishing the bans placed on humans in their contacts with nature. Beginning from the first moment the cattle are released onto the spring grass, through the permission given to lie down on the ground, swim in rivers, eat the forest undergrowth, to the blessing of the fields, fruits and the permission granted to eat them, a gradual expansion of the rights of human beings ensues, allowing them to make use of the fruits of nature, to be able to relatively safely partake in the natural environment. This happens until the day of Our 296 Lady of the Sowing, when the seeds are placed into the earth and another series of bans limiting human behaviours towards nature ensues. Fishing rituals and customs are also written into this yearly cycle. Leaving aside other professional groups for the moment, it should be remembered that the fishermen leaving to make their first salmon catch of a given year place herbs blessed on the day of Our Lady of the Herbs at the bottoms of their boats and burn incense over the nets, while weather forecasts are connected with the day of Our Lady of the Berries, on the day of Our Lady of the Herbs they bless flowers and fruits of the fields (similarly as in the case of farmers) and finally they venerate Our Lady of the Eel (of the Rosary) (Stelmachowska 1933: 99, 178, 183). Thus, the Virgin Mary is present in their lives throughout the year, and thanks to her the first and last tasks (the first fishing excursion – the blessing of nature’s produce) constitute a closed cycle. The strong position of Marian holidays within folk culture can be additionally attested to by the fact that next to the church-given names of these holidays, they are also endowed with folk names: of the Blessed Thunder Candle, of the Opening, of the Stream, of the Berries, of the Herbs, of the Sowing, of the Eel, etc. These names exist in various forms, which testify to the naturalisation of the Virgin Mary within Polish folk culture. We should also add to the list of the above-mentioned Catholic holidays of the yearly cycle, those which exist within the Orthodox church: the Day of Our Lady of Mercy (Pokrovy) on 1 October (so-called Pokrovitse), Poias Boguroditsy (Serbia, Bulgaria) which is celebrated on 31 August mainly by pregnant women, and also 4 December (Blessed Virgin Mary’s Sacrifice), celebrated by Catholics on 21 November, already mentioned during quoting the description of this holiday among the Greek Catholic Hutsuli and their approach connected to the giving of milk by cows, magical behaviours supposed to induce the fertility of the earth. These same elements are also present in the two previously mentioned holidays, and the very name of the strips of the rainbow, which tie the heavens and the earth and in this way ensure fertility, is very significant. We can include among the various yearly ceremonies, those which have thus far been omitted within these considerations and which are of a more playful nature, seeming to be far removed from sacral behaviours: carol-singing, the performance of a play about Herod4, dyngus5 and gaik6. They exist in very diverse forms and are in various ways connected to the very closely linked Christmas or Easter holidays. They are of an interest to us due to the songs sung within which the Virgin Mary is referred to. For example, carol-singers, when wishing their hosts abundance and health, mention the Most Holy Lady, who brought breakfast to the ploughman walking behind the golden plough and was supposed to have drunk from a golden cup, dug out of the earth (Kolberg, Krakowskie, vol. 5, pt. 1: 236). The Virgin Mary appears in this carol alongside the Lord God and Jesus, as if in order to authenticate the offered wishes. The material collected in the Lubelski area (Bartmiński 1986) is even more interesting, as it seems to show – according to the supposition personally conveyed to me by the author – that during carolsinging addressed to girls, the Virgin Mary takes the place of the girl in the songs. A 4 A Christmas folk performance which presents the fight between good and evil and also the death of Herod – editor’s note. 5 A Folk custom connected to Easter Monday – editor’s note. 6 A folk custom connected to ushering in spring – editor’s note. 297 similar situation can be noted to occur in songs sung during gaik. If these suppositions were to be confirmed by further analysis of the material concerning carol-singing and gaik, then we would be dealing with the treatment of the Virgin Mary not only as the Mother, but also as a girl, in actuality – the Most Holy of Ladies. It cannot be precluded that these signs could lead us into the much more distant past and enable the establishment of the being, whose place in Polish folk culture was replaced by the Virgin Mary (Deva, Dzhiva). However, any further speculations must be preceded by a very exact analysis of the above-mentioned ritual behaviours and might even bring into doubt the proposals of Koleva (1973) that the Bulgarian Lazarki and corresponding ceremonies among the Western and Eastern Slavic peoples be treated as girls’ initiation rites (or at least this proposal would have to be strongly modified). Dyngus also belongs among the group of ritual behaviours during which the songs that are sung refer to Maryja, similarly as in the case of carol-singing and wedding orations (which will be discussed below). A significant, though thus far unconsidered issue, remains the relationship between the cycle of holidays and rituals connected to the saints and the Virgin Mary. It seems that especially in Orthodox culture St. George, St. John, St. Ilja (Elijah), St. Dimitri in some situations play a more important role than does the Virgin Mary. An answer to this question which would take into account material from the areas of the Southern and Eastern Slavic peoples might add much to attempts to establish the place occupied by the Virgin Mary in Polish folk culture. III. THE VIRGIN MARY IN FAMILY CEREMONIES In family ceremonies, the Virgin Mary is present primarily during births, weddings and funerals, and in each of these in a very marked way. She first appears next to the woman giving birth: she is the guardian of those giving birth. Moszyński discusses this in the following way: “Among the West Finns, i.e. the Ests, either a mythical being called róugutaja or else the Virgin Mary play the role of the guardian of the childbirth and of the newborn baby” (1967: 693). Whereas “the babka midwife” from Bessarabia addresses the Virgin Mary, burning incense over an oilcake covered with honey intended for her, with a plea that she come to her aid when she is summoned: Svita Boguródica da i na pomoč, dětu ja puvikam, da idi” (1967: 255). In other parts of Bulgaria, they prepare special bread (unleavened) as thanks to the Virgin Mary for her help during childbirth. They quickly share the bread and while they eat it, they state that she is already hurrying off to another woman (Georgieva, 1983). Thus, women, who experienced the Virgin Mary’s help during childbirth, reason that they will be similarly purified. From the research conducted thus far, primarily on the basis of the collection of Kolberg’s material, we can deduce that the Virgin Mary is especially interested in and influences the destiny of the woman giving birth. If other research does not result in new information, we can state that this is how she differs from various clan spirits, fairies, etc., which appeared during childbirth and gave presents to the baby, determining its fate, etc. (Moszyński 1967: 693). In wedding rituals, the Virgin Mary appears in three situations: during the inviting of guests by the bride (or by both the bride and the groom), during the matchmaker’s oration when the couple leaves the house for the church and when the garland is taken off 298 or during the move of the bride to the house of the groom. In the first case, the bride sometimes recites a relatively long invitation, sometimes referring to the wedding in Cana of Galilee, mentioning that “Jesus and Mary will be there, the entire company” (Kolberg, Poznańskie, vol. 11, part 3: 67 ff.). Sometimes texts are recited, in which the young couple, aside from mentioning Jesus and Mary also mention Adam and Eve. In the second case, the matchmaker presents a usually longer and more sophisticated oration at the moment when the bride bids farewell to her parents before leaving for the church. Here we also encounter references to the wedding in Cana of Galilee, Mary and Jesus, sometimes St. Joseph, and also from time to time – Adam and Eve. These references clearly point to a symbolic return to the beginnings of the world in the moment of creating a new relationship. The tendency to exchange Eve for the Virgin Mary is significant. It can also be noted that a thread is woven in about a re-blooming branch. Finally, the last time that the name of Maryja is summoned during the wedding rituals is within the songs sung when the garland is being removed. For example, in the song “Matuś moja, mąż mnie bije” (Mommy of mine, my husband beats me), Mother can be exchanged for Mother of God (Kolberg, Kieleckie, pt. 1: 76) and the situation is similar in many songs, while such conversions do not seem to change the meaning of the song. During funeral ceremonies, the reference to the Virgin Mary usually occurs at the moment when the conventional border of the village is crossed in the form of a crucifix or figure found at the boundaries of the village. At that point, the gathered people sing Salve Regina, so as to beg the Queen of Mercy for grace for the soul of the deceased so that it may pass through the gates of heaven. Among this group of funeral songs, we may also include songs about St. Peter – the keeper of the keys – and the Virgin Mary, who intercedes with him on behalf of the lost soul (Kolberg, Kaliskie, vol. 23: 125). The list of situations in which people appeal to the Virgin Mary is perhaps not very long; however, we encounter them in numerous descriptions and collections. An overview of such material raises the speculation that they are not situated randomly. As a principle, they appear at the beginning of a ceremony and at its end. The Virgin Mary appears at the birth of a child, next during the reasoning of the woman who has given birth; when the guests are invited to the wedding and then when the bride bids farewell to her parents; in connection with the garland and the moment of passing under the authority of her husband. Finally, she appears when the deceased is being bid farewell, after a “Thunder Candle” has been placed in his hand while still being at home and after which the entire community places him into the care of the Virgin Mary during his passage into eternal rest. An analysis of the consequences of events should convince us that the presence of the Virgin Mary within the ceremony is in accordance with its structure of significance, while the Virgin Mary appears at its beginning and at its end, thus – significantly – not only at its end or only at its beginning. IV. THE BEGINNING AND THE END The Virgin Mary is present not only at the beginning and the end of the mentioned ceremonies. In the available ethnographic material, a relatively large amount of space is taken up by mentions of the choice of a lucky day for beginning various more important forms of work, especially ploughing, sowing, harvesting, building a house, etc. The days dedicated to the Virgin Mary are considered lucky for initiating all types of work, and 299 sometimes even the eves of such days are perceived similarly. This is confirmed by the above-quoted material about the Hutsuli, which contains data concerning the ritual behaviours on the eve of 24 December. The beginning of the activity, in this case the turning over of the first ridge (especially of new, uncultivated earth), the cutting of the first ears of wheat, etc, should take place on a day devoted to the Virgin Mary. The same is true of the cutting of the last ears and the placement of a wreath. A wreath is offered up to the Virgin Mary (if this takes place in a church) or garlands are blessed for the Virgin Mary, and not to or for God, Jesus or the saints. V. AN ATTEMPT AT SOME CONCLUSIONS S. Czarnowski describes the Virgin Mary as the most piously worshipped holy figure in folk religions (Czarnowski 1956). This statement must be supplemented. It seems to result from the initial overview of the types of available information about the presence of the Virgin Mary in folk culture that she is an essential character. She is present in transition rituals of a yearly type, ensuring as a result of her mediation its appropriate execution, the same may be stated about the establishment and termination of ties and the constitution of a new state (not only in the social sense) in the lives of human beings, during weddings and funerals, during childbirth. Her holidays mark out the farming calendar and people call on her mediation at the beginning and end of important tasks, aimed at creating something new. In such situations, the Virgin Mary is frequently present instead of the crucifix or the name of Jesus. In extreme situations, people turn to her, supporting the words with some blessed herbs or a “Thunder Candle” (death, a fire). We can find the Virgin Mary in various places within folk culture. The fact that she is present interchangeably with the sign of the cross and the name of Jesus, Eve and one’s own mother, the female family spirit is an extremely interesting issue for further research. Thus, she appears interchangeably but these conversions are not random. I will omit at this point any considerations about her presence in folkloristic threads and the moments when she takes someone else’s place, as this would require the collection of a much broader range of material. Her presence adds power to certain action or objects (e.g. równianki7 on 15th August, the end of harvest, the words of carols). The Marian cult in Polish folk culture has a maternal character, and in a certain sense – one of fertility. Fertility is not directly dependent on her, but she ensures the proper course of the ceremonies which ensure fertility. The feature of her virginity very often remains in the shadows. For this reason, very interesting results may be achieved from research conducted in accordance with the approach indicated by J. Bartmiński (1986), dealing with her connections with ceremonies or fragments of such rituals focused around groups of girls. Ethnographers, emphasizing that Mary is the queen of the heavens connected with the moon and not the sun, observe this as being a lunar, chthonic element, and are prone to 7 A basket filled with ears of wheat, fruit and flowers, which during the Day of Our Lady of Herbs is sprinkled with holy water to be blessed – editor’s note. 300 perceive this as a sign of her connection with the Great Mothers (Bielaj: 8). I have already expressed my opinion on this subject. It is not a fully answered question, as can be seen to result from the available literature. It is interesting to note the lack of information about the conducting of demonic practices on Mary. It also does not seem as if she occurs within any plots or situations interchangeably with the devil, even though one case has been noted of describing something, which is customarily called little godly feet, as “little devil’s feet” (Podlasie, inf. A. Kunczyńska-Iracka). There can be no doubt that in order to find answers to the above-mentioned questions (and in order to pose many other, perhaps even more significant ones), it is necessary to conduct research within the entire field of folk culture, not only in Poland. It seems that the Marian cult and Polish folk religiosity have many features in common with the folk cultures of other Slavic peoples. It cannot, however, be stated with all certainty that the Marian cult constitutes the specific feature of our religiosity. It is sure that it is significant but what exactly is it like? The answers to this question may be found in the words of Pope John Paul II: “The Virgin Mary is always similar to the people from one’s own home. In Mexico, when I was looking at Our Lady of Guadalupe, the Virgin Mary of the Indians, she reminded me most of Our Lady of Ludźmierz, because she is a real highlander’s wife from Podhale” (from the homily dated 8th June 1979 in Nowy Targ). Translated by: LINGUA LAB, www.lingualab.pl, Miłosława Stępień LITERATURE Bartmiński J. 1986 Kolęda i jej odmiany gatunkowe, [in:] Kolędowanie na Lubelszczyżnie, Wrocław, pp. 78-134. Bihlejskij slovar... Biblejskij slovar, Toronto, ed. E. Nuftrem. 1980 Belaj V. Marija w puckim vjerovanjima Hrvata. Prolegomena jednom istrazivackom zadatku, Zagreb. Cooper J. С. 1978 An illustrated encyclopaedia of traditional symbols. London. Czarnowski S. 1956 Kultura religijna wiejskiego ludu polskiego, [in:] Kultura, Dzieła, t. I, Warszawa, pp. 88-108. Dobrzeniecki T. 1965 Legenda średniowieczna w piśmiennictwie i sztuce. Chrystofania Marii, [in:] Średniowiecze. Studia o kulturze, t. 2. Wroclaw, pp. 7-120. Encyclopaedia... 1908 - Encyclopaedia of Religion and Ethics, t. VIlI-474b-480a, hasło „Mary" („Virgin"), 1926 Edinburgh — New York, eds. J. Hastins. Federowski M. 1897 Lud białoruski na Rusi litewskiej. Kraków, t. I. 1902 Lud białoruski na Rusi litewskiej, Kraków, t. II. 1903 Lud białoruski na Rusi litewskiej, Kraków, t. III. Fiedeń MSF K. 301 1982 Stan badań nad maryjną pobożnością ludową w Polsce (1957-1980), Lublin, KUL. Frankowska M. 1986 Sanktuaria i pielgrzymki — ich rola w procesie ewangelizacji Indian Meksyku oraz kształtowania się miejscowego synkretyzmu religijnego, „Etnografia Polska", t. 30, z. 2, pp. 95-126. Georgieva I. 1983 Byłgarska narodna milologija, Sofia. Gratia plena... 1965 Gratia plena. Studia teologiczne o Bogurodzicy. Poznań, ed. B. Przybylski. Grąbczewsfto J. 1982 Wizerunek Matki Boskiej w polskiej kulturze ludowej, praca doktorska, maszynopis, archiwum Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego. 1984 Postać Matki Boskiej w ludowych przekazach językowych, „Polska Sztuka Ludowa", R. 38. nr 3. pp. 157-167. Handworterbuch... 1933 Handworterbuch des deutschen Aberglaubens, wyd. E. Hoffmann-Krayer, cz. V, z. 12 (Mantel - Marz), haslo Maria (hl.), pp. 1638-1706, Berlin - Leipzig. Kolberg O. 19611975 Dzieła wszystkie Oskara Kolberga, Wrocław, t. 1-68. Koleva Т. 1973 Institut des initiations en Bułgarie, „Ethnologia Slavica", t. V, pp. 163-185. Kopeć CP J. J. 1983 Uwarunkowania historyczno-kulturowe czci Bogurodzicy w polskiej religijności, [in:] Religijność ludowa, ciągłość i zmiana, ed. W. Piwowarski, Wrocław. Kopiczko ks. Z. Ludowa pobożność maryjna w świetle dziel Oskara Kolberga, Lublin, 1986, referat na V Kongresie Mariologicznym. Krzyżanowski J. 1962Polska bajka ludowa w układzie systematycznym, t. I-II, Wrocław—Warszawa— 1963 Kraków. Kunczyńska-Iracka A. 1978 Malarstwo ludowe kręgu częstochowskiego, Wrocław. 1986 Odbicie ludowego kultu Matki Bożej w sztuce chłopskiej XIX w., referat na V Kongresie Mariologicznym, Lublin, 1986. Leeuw G. van der 1978 Fenomenologia religii, Warszawa. Mify narodov mira... 19801982 Mify narodov mira, t. I i II, Moskva, ed. S. A. Tokarev. Moszyński K. 1967 Kultura ludowa Słowian, t. 2, cz. 1, Kultura duchowa, Warszawa. Mroczko Т., Dąb B. 1966 Gotyckie hodegetria polskie, [in:] Średniowiecze. Studia o kulturze, t. 3, Wrocław, pp. 18-70. 302 Nowak ks. W. 1986 Duchowość maryjna polskich ewangelików na Pomorzu Wschodnim, referat na V Kongresie Mariologicznym, Lublin, 1986. Religijność ludowa... 1983 Religijność ludowa, ciągłość i zmiana, Wrocław, ed. W. Piwowarski. Schmidt P. W. 1955a Das Mutterrecht, Wien—Módling. 1955b Gebrauche des Ehemannes bei Schangerschaft und Geburt, Wien— Miinchen. Sokolewicz Z. [in print] Miejsce Matki Boskiej w polskiej kulturze ludowej, referat na V Kongresie Mariologicznym, Lublin, 1986. Stelmachowska B. 1933 Rok obrzędowy na Pomorzu, Toruń. Stomma L. 1973 Struktura czasowa słowiańskich obrzędów przejścia cyklu dorocznego, maszynopis pracy doktorskiej, archiwum Katedry Etnologii i Antropologii Kulturowej UW. Srpski mitoloszki ręcznik 1970 Srpski mitoloszki ręcznik, red. S. Kulisicz, P. Ż. Petrovicz, N. Pantelicz, Beograd. Szuchiewicz W. 1904 Huculszczyzna, Lwów. Wasilewski J. S. 1988 Tabu, zakaz, nieczystość a paradygmat etnologii symbolicznej. Warszawa. Zowczak H. M. 1986 Bohater współczesnej wsi, maszynopis pracy doktorskiej, archiwum Katedry Etnologii i Antropologii Kulturowej UW. Zofia Sokolewicz MADONNA IN POLISH FOLK CULTURE OF THE 19 AND 20 CENTURIES SELECTED PROBLEMS OF SOURCES AND ARISING QUESTIONS Summary The person of God's Mother is present in many different domains of Polich folk culture as well as in that of other Slavonic and generally European nations. She appears in the rites and ceremonies of the annual cycle and in those of the life cycle, as well as in beliefs, legends, tales, short stories, apocrypha, magical formulas, proverbs, in the objects belonging to the arrangement and decoration of churches and houses and in the iconography associated with all those elements. Madonna is always present in all Catholic ceremonies and church feasts, in the sacral architecture of large and small scale, in the ex-vota and various devotional articles. That means that in our studies we should embrace all the symbolic sphere of folk culture. According to Stefan Czarnowski Madonna is the most worshipped holy person in the folk religious life. She appears in the ceremonies of the annual cycle which are kind of transition rites (rites de passage) securing, owing to Her mediatory function, their correct performance. The same concerns the rites initiating anl dissolving social relations and constituting one's new status (not only in social sense) at wedding ceremonies, funerals and rites of birth. The holy days dedicated to God's Mother mark out the annual cycle in agricultural activities and people appeal to Her mediation 303 beginning and completing the most important tasks. In the rites as well as in beliefs Madonna appears interchangeably with the sign of the cross, the name Jesus, with Eve, human mother and the female spirit of the clan. The study on this matter can throw some light on the process of entering of the figure of God's Mother into folk culture and the ways of its adaptation. Many ethnographers regard God's Mother not only as Mother but as a Great Mother. The cult of St. Mary and of Great Mothers are not two separate systems. But the phenomenological study of the subject allows us to ascertain that although the cult of Madonna in Polish folk culture has a character of a maternal cult still God's Mother is by no means a foremother. She had not been present since the creation of the Universe nor had She included all what was later called into existence. However it is easier to find the common traits of the Madonna's cult in various cultures than to define its Polish specific. Abstract translated by Anna Kuczyńska-Skrzypek This project is financed by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education as part of the National Program for Development of Humanities, 2012-2014.