Magdalena Sajdak*, Borja Velazquez
Transkrypt
Magdalena Sajdak*, Borja Velazquez
Ochrona Środowiska i Zasobów Naturalnych nr 49, 2011 r. Magdalena Sajdak*, Borja Velazquez-Marti* Estimation of pruned biomass through the adaptation of classic dendrometry on urban forests: case study of Sophora japonica Oszacowanie ilości ściętej biomasy w oparciu o adaptację metody klasycznego pomiaru drzewostanu w zieleni miejskiej na przykładzie Sophora japonica Key words: urban forest, residual biomass, renewable energy, source of alternative energy, bioenergy. Słowa kluczowe: zieleń miejska, biomasa odpadowa, relacje allometryczne, równania objętości, bioenergia. Ilość miejskiego drewna pochodzącego z operacji cięć pielęgnacyjnych jest potencjalnie dużym, niewykorzystanym źródłem biomasy, która mogłaby bardziej znacząco przyczynić się do regionalnej i krajowej biogospodarki niż ma to miejsce obecnie. Lepsze wykorzystanie biomasy drzewnej z miejskich terenów zielonych i rekreacyjnych oraz obszarów przemysłowych, stanowiącej biopaliwo do wytwarzania ciepła i energii. Mogłoby to zmniejszyć presję na lasy oraz zmniejszyć koszty składowania odpadów na poziomie lokalnym oraz regionalnym. Określenie ilości miejskiej biomasy drzewnej, stworzenie kompleksowej bazy danych na temat charakterystyki dendrometrycznej, poznanie zależności pomiędzy podstawowymi parametrami drzewa a ilością uzyskanej biomasy uznano za cel tego badania. Wyniki ilościowe drzewnej biomasy odpadowej uzyskanej z rocznych cięć pielęgnacyjnych gatunku Sophora japonica są przedstawione w pracy zgodnie z rodzajem praktyki stosowanych cięć. Drewno stanowiło 59,97% ogólnej masy materiału pochodzącego z cięć pielęgnacyjnych przed procesem suszenia, wilgotność drewna w stanie świeżym wyniosła 44,88%, a średnia ilość suchej biomasy uzyskanej z pojedynczego drzewa wyniosła 18,07 kg. Modele regresji zostały zastosowane do przewidzenia wagi suchej biomasy uzyskanej z pojedyncze* MSc. Eng. Magdalena Sajdak, Dr. Borja Velazquez-Marti – Department of Rural and Agrifood Engineering Universidad Politecnica de Valencia, Camino de Vera s/n. 46022 Valencia, España. [email protected], [email protected] 117 Magdalena Sajdak, Borja Velazquez-Marti go drzewa. Istotne zależności zaobserwowano pomiędzy ilością biomasy oraz średnicą na wysokości pierśnicy w wysokości R2 = 0,60. Analiza wskazuje, że znaczące ilości biomasy odpadowej pochodzącej z operacji cięć pielęgnacyjnych gatunków ozdobnych mogą być wykorzystywane do osiągnięcia celów ekologicznych i energetycznych. Ponadto, przedstawiona metodologia tworzy narzędzie do lepszego przewidywania zysków, pracy w terenie oraz zarządzania logistycznego na przyszłość. 1. INTRODUCTION Urban forests and city parks are a potentially abundant source of wood biomass. Due to the lack of information on the availability and characteristics of urban wood residual biomass, proper management of this valuable material is not popular in the renewable energy sector. Currently municipalities pay significant values for maintenance of urban green space and few processes are applied to offset these expenses [McKeever, Skog 2003, Solid Waste… 2002]. Most of urban wood waste biomass is not further processed and lands up in landfills [MacFarlane 2007]. A new and comprehensive approach to waste management in urban forests and city parks could contribute to local and regional economies [MacFarlane 2009]. Moreover, the lack of precise information on the quantity and quality of the raw material as well as basic dendrometric characteristics of species in relation with potential biomass creates a barrier to the rational use of this material. Sophora japonica L. also known as Styphnolobium japonicum and Pagoda Tree is a species in the subfamily Faboidea of the pea family Fabaceae. Sophora japonica is native to eastern Asia and a popular species in almost all Europe. Reaching up to 25 m in height, cultivated as ornamental or shade tree in streets, city parks and towns often accompanies the Robinia, which has a very similar appearance. It is appreciated for flowering in late summer after most flowering trees have finished, its resistance to cold, as well as heat and dryness [López González 2010]. Due to its beautiful deep green colour foliage, that is not attacked by insects and the advantage over Robinia to give a denser shade it is widely used in urban zones [De La Torre 2001]. 2. MATERIAL AND METHODS 2.1. Field study The study area is located in Mislata, a city of the east of Spain in the province of Valencia. The procedure of trial consisted on a random selection of a municipal street of dense car and pedestrian traffic and 30 individuals of Sophora japonica pruned under uniform topping type of pruning practice. Previously to carry out pruning operations, the identification of the selected individuals was performed. Following data were determined: 118 A total of 30 individuals of Sophora japonica with diameter at breast height between 13.823.0cm, crown diameter between 5.79.75 m, distance from soil to the crown between Estimation of pruned biomass through the adaptation of classic dendrometry... 2.84.7m and total tree height between 7.412.4 m were examined. All sampled trees were pruned1.each year under uniform topping type (at of pruning practice. Thisdiameter, type of pruning Tree data: diameter at breast height 1.3 m height), crown distance from to the crown, total tree consists ofsoil removing the major part height. of the canopy from the tree and leaving mostly branch 2. Tree management information: date and type of last pruning operations. stubs [Michau 1987]. A total of 30 individuals of Sophora japonica with diameter at breast height between To measure trunk a traditional aluminium was used, for crown diameter 13.8–23.0 cm,diameters crown diameter between 5.7–9.75calliper m, distance from soil to the crown be-a tween 2.8–4.7 andheight total tree heightIVbetween 7.4–12.4 m pruning were examined. All ended, sampled tape measure, and formthe a Vertex hypsometer. Once operations the trees were pruned each year under uniform topping type of pruning practice. This type of residual biomass was formed in bundles and weighted by means of a dynamometer. Weight pruning consists of removing the major part of the canopy from the tree and leaving mostly measurements were[Michau carried1987]. out in field conditions. Samples of wood were put into small branch stubs To measure trunkto diameters a traditional wasconditions used, for crown diamplastic containers in order determine moisture aluminium content in calliper laboratory and obtain eter a tape measure, and for the height a Vertex IV hypsometer. Once pruning operations dry matter results. Evolution of the drying process was carried out in two types of conditions: ended, the residual biomass was formed in bundles and weighted by means of a dynamom- open-air with average temperature 21.32ºC humidity 42.41%, stove eter.drying Weight measurements were carried out in and fieldrelative conditions. Samples of wood weredrying put into small plastic containers in ordera to determine in laboratory In both cases, daily record moisture of resultscontent was made until the conditions with temperature 105ºC. and obtain dry matter results. Evolution the drying process wasdefoliated carried outtoindetermine two types of stabilization of weight. Several branches ofofeach sample-tree were the conditions: open-air drying with average temperature 21.32ºC and relative humidity 42.41%, percentage of foliage and wood mass. Sampled branches were collected for further stove drying with temperature 105ºC. In both cases, a daily record of results was made until dendrometric calculations. the stabilization of weight. Several branches of each sample-tree were defoliated to deter- mine the percentage of foliage and wood mass. Sampled branches were collected for fur- 2.2. Dendrometric analysis of the branches ther dendrometric calculations. The dendrometric analysis is focused on developing methods to calculate the actual volume of any structure of the tree.2.2. From this result, the biomass be estimated by multiplying the Dendrometric analysis of can the branches density by the volume. For this, morphic coefficient f (also called form factor) was studied. The dendrometric analysis is focused on developing methods to calculate the actual Morphic coefficient f is defined astree. the ratio thethe actual volume of aestimated branch and a volume of any structure of the Frombetween this result, biomass can be by multiplyingmodel the density by calculated the volume.from For this, coefficient f (also called form factor) was geometric volume basemorphic diameter and length (Equation 1). The model studied. Morphic coefficient f is defined as the ratio between the actual volume of a branch that provided the form factor closer to 1 defined better the shape of the branch, and hence, it and a geometric model volume calculated from base diameter and length (Equation 1). The was selected for provided actual volume estimations. model that the form factor closer to 1 defined better the shape of the branch, and hence, it was selected for actual volume estimations. f Actual volume of the analyzed structure Model volume (1) (1) Therefore, form factor allows determining the volume of any structure by measuring the basal diameter andallows length.determining The form factor beofa parameter characteristic of the Therefore, form factor theshould volume any structure by measuring thespecies and diameter class. However, for each test performed it was detected a statistical vari- basal diameter and length. The form factor should be a parameter characteristic of the species ability. Because of this, the mean and dispersion for each case were determined. Actual volume determination was carried out on sampled branches of Sophora japon- ica that were collected after pruning operations in the selected sampled trees. These data 3 119 and diameter class. However, for each test performed it was detected a statistical variability. Because of this, the mean and dispersion for each case were determined. Actual volume determination was carried out onBorja sampled branches of Sophora japonica that Magdalena Sajdak, Velazquez-Marti were collected after pruning operations in the selected sampled trees. These data were considered to obtain basic data for the development of relationships between the dimensions were considered to obtain basic data for the development of relationships between the diof branchesof and their volume. calculate theTo actual volumethe of aactual branch,volume this wasofdivided mensions branches and To their volume. calculate a branch, this into several sections equal with the length of 10 the cm, length such asof the10Fig. indicates [Lopez was dividedequal into several sections with cm,1 such as the Fig. 1 indicates [Lopez 2003, Velazquez al. 2010, 2009]. was The calculated volume was calculated by the Serrano Serrano 2003, Velazquez et al. 2010,etWest 2009].West The volume by the following equations(Tab. (Tab.1).1). following equations d1 d3 d2 d5 d4 d6 di Fig. 1 Measurements of diameters in each interval Fig. 1. Measurements of diameters in each interval Rys. 1. Pomiary średnicy każdego odcinka Rys. 1.Pomiary średnicy każdego odcinka Table 1. Sectional volume formulae Tabela 1. Równania objetości Table 1. Sectional volume formulae Tabela 1.Równania objetości Volume formulae 1 Vi h Volume R 2 r 2formulae Rr 3 2 Vi h Ra1 where Ra (2R r )2/ 2 ( Volume model Volume of a truncated cone Volume model ) Smalian’s formula Volume of a truncated cone Vi = ⋅ π ⋅ h 2⋅ R + r + R ⋅ r 3 d V h Volume of a cylinder i 2 Vi =Rπis⋅the h ⋅ major Ra2 where Rar =is (the R +miner r ) / 2radius, h is the length Smalian’s Where radius, of interval,formula d is the diameter 2 d Volume of a cylinder V = π ⋅ ⋅h The total actuali volume 2 ofthe branch was obtained from the sum of volumes of all sections (Equation 2). Where R is the major radius, r is the miner radius, h is the length of interval, d is the diameter. i V real Vi (2) 1 The total actual volume of the branch was obtained from the sum of volumes of all sections (Equation To calculate the 2). model volume of the branch the volume of the following solids of revolution i was analyzed: cone, cylinder, paraboloid and neoloid (Tab. 2) [Husch et al. 2003]. V real = ∑ Vi 1 (2) To calculate the model volume of the branch the volume of the following solids of rev4 olution was analyzed: cone, cylinder, paraboloid and neoloid (Tab. 2) [Husch et al. 2003]. 120 Ra ( R r ) / 2 Ra ( R r ) / 2 2 Ra ( R dr ) / 2 2 h V Estimation of pruned biomass through thei adaptation dendrometry... d of classic Vi d2 2 h 2 Vi 2 d h Vi 2 h Table 2. Equations to compute volume of solids of revolution 1 2 objętości Vi 1 brył h 2R 2 2 r 2 R r Tabela 2.Równania wykorzystane do obliczeniaV R r Rr i 1 32 h obrotowych Vi 3d h R 2 r 2 R r vVolume 3d 2model h Model type 42 h 2R 2 v Vi d a2 a Vvi 4 dhh2hR V R iv 4 Cylinder h a 1 4(Rd 2 r ) / 2 R v aa1( R dr2) / h2 R R v a12( R d4r2) 2/ h2 Paraboloid v 2 1 4d h2 vV2 4d 2d2 h h 2 Vvi i 12 dd 42 h Vi 1 d222 h h Cone v 13 d42 2 h v 3 1 4d h v 3 4 2 h 1 d Neoloid v 1 3 d242 h 4 2d4 2 v v 14dd 2d4 2h hh v 1 4hdof a branch, h is the height of the Where v is the volume model, d is the base diameter 4h h v v 44 44 of the 4 sample. branch, which has been measured for each individual 2 1 1 d 2d v h 2 v 1 2d 4 h 2.3. Residual biomass prediction v h 2 4 models 2 4 2 CD22 hc vc with Apparent volume of a tree crown was related the 2d biomass 1 CD hc obtained from pruning v 1 d 2122 h vc 3 4 CD 12 v height h hc from soil to the crown. ments taken at field: crown diameter, total treevc and 122height 3 4CD hc 12 22and semisphere) From these data, three solids of revolution (cone, paraboloid were applied vc 1 CD 2d 2 hc 1 dCD 8 tree v h crowns 2of vc for volume calculation. It is assumed that growth models resemble the form hc d CD vvc1 4 48 hh 2 hc v 4 8 et al. 2003]. of semispheric, parabolic and conical growth (Tab. vc443) [Dieguez 4CD 83 vc CD 3 3 12 Table 3. Growth models vc CD 3 vc 12 CD Tabela 3.Modele wzrostu vc 12 12 Growth models Volume model2 CD hc CD 22 hc vc vc CD12 hc Cone vc 12 12 2 CD hc 2 CD 2 hc vc Parabolid vc CD 8 hc vc 8 8 3 CD CD 33 Semisphere vc vc CD vc 1212 12 dCD hc operations. The apparent volume of a tree crown vvc1was 3 determined 4 h 2 using simple measure- 121 height, crown diameter and total tree height. Magdalena Sajdak, Borja Velazquez-Marti 3. RESULTS AND SUMARRY The results of quantification of the residual wood biomass obtained from pru Where vc is the crown volume, CD is the crown diameter, hc is the crown height. of Sophora japonica are presented. The results are shown according to the top Regression models were also calculated to predict the amount of residual biomass from pruning operations of Sophora from simple measures as diameter at breast pruning practicejaponica applied. The procedure of such pruning was held every height, crown diameter and total tree height. year. The f type of pruning operations have a key influence on the quantity of the materia [Drénou 2006].3.Compared sample trees are characterised with mean diameter RESULTS AND SUMARRY 17.80 cm, mean crown diameter 6.95 m, mean height from soil to the crown 3 The results of quantification of the residual wood biomass obtained from pruning opera- tions of Sophora japonica presented. results arecould shownbe according to thewood topping type total heightare 10.22 m. InThe this work noted that formed 59.97% o of pruning practice applied. The procedure of pruning was held every year. The frequency and all pruned material before drying. The rest 40.02% of weight was formed by l type of pruning operations have a key influence on the quantity of the material produced [Dré- nou 2006]. Compared trees are44.88% characterised with meanThe diameter breast height moisturesample content was in wet basis. meanatand dispersion obtained 17.80 cm, mean crown diameter 6.95 m, mean height from soil to the crown 3.53 m and mean sample trees analyzed according to the quantity of residual biomass obtained w total height 10.22 m. In this work could be noted that wood formed 59.97% of total weight of all Fig. 2 shows drybefore wooddrying. biomass per40.02% tree and standard 4.25 kg. pruned material The rest of weight was deviation formed by leaves. Wood mois- the va ture content was 44.88% in wet basis. The mean and dispersion obtained comparing all sam- moisture content during the evaluation of the drying process carried out in bot ple trees analyzed according to the quantity of residual biomass obtained were 18.07 kg of dry drying drying conditions. It is the observed the minimum wood biomass per treeand andconvection standard deviation 4.25 kg. Fig. 2 shows variationthat of moisture moi content during the evaluation of the drying process carried out in both open-air drying and con- open-air was obtained after 26 days and in stove drying conditions after 24 ho vection drying conditions. It is observed that the minimum moisture content in open-air was the amount wood obtained obtained afterresults 26 daysallow and incalculating stove drying conditions afterof 24dry hours. Dry biomass matter results allow from prun calculating the amount of dry wood biomass obtained from pruning operations. 50 45 40 Humidity (%) 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Days Fig. 2. Drying curves Fig. 2. Drying curves Rys. 2.Krzywa wysychania Rys. 2. Krzywa wysychania 3.1. Branch form factor Table 4 shows the results of mean and standard deviation values of the branch 122 obtained for different models. From these values, the actual volume of each br Estimation of pruned biomass through the adaptation of classic dendrometry... 3.1. Branch form factor Table 4 shows from the results mean and deviationand values of the formproduced a obtained simpleofmeasures suchstandard as base diameter length. The branch model that factors obtained for different models. From these values, the actual volume each form factor closer to 1 was the cylinder. This model represented theofbest fit branch to characterize the can be obtained from simple measures such as base diameter and length. The model that actual volume. produced a form factor closer to 1 was the cylinder. This model represented the best fit to characterize the actual volume. Table 4. Mean values and standard deviation of form factor of samplevalues branches of Sophora Table 4. Mean and standardjaponica deviation of form factor of sample branches of Sophora jaTabela 4. ponica Wartości średnie i odchylenie standardowe czynnika kształtu próbek gałęzi Sophora japonica Tabela 4.Wartości średnie i odchylenie standardowe czynnika kształtu próbek gałęzi Sophora japonica Model volume Model Cylinder Paraboloid Cone Neoloid volume ƒ Smalian Smalian ƒ σƒ σ ƒ Real volume Real volume Trunced cone cone Trunced ƒ σƒ ƒ σƒ ƒ Cylinder Cylinder σƒ σ ƒ ƒ 0,57058382 0,09620885 0,57001005 0,09612454 0,61456002 0,10167947 0,57058382 0,09620885 0,57001005 0,09612454 0,61456002 0,10167947 Cylinder 1,14116765 0,19241771 1,1400201 0,19224909 1,22912004 0,20335894 1,14116765 0,19241771 1,1400201 0,19224909 1,22912004 0,20335894 Paraboloid 1,71175147 0,28862656 1,71003014 0,28837363 1,84368006 0,3050384 1,71175147 0,28862656 1,71003014 0,28837363 1,84368006 0,3050384 0,38483541 2,28004019 0,38449817 2,45824009 0,40671787 Cone2,2823353 2,2823353 2,28004019 0,38449817 2,45824009 0,40671787 Where ƒ is the mean form factor, σ0,38483541 is the standard deviation. Neoloid Where ƒ is the mean form factor, σ is the standard deviation. 3.2. Regression models for the prediction of residual biomass 3.2. Regression models for thetoprediction residual biomassbiomass from anRegression models were calculated predict theof amount of residual nual crown Regression raising pruning operations of Sophora japonica from simple measures suchfrom as annual models were calculated to predict the amount of residual biomass diameter atcrown breast height, crownoperations diameter and total tree height. from The best result is presentjaponica simple measures such as diameter raising pruning of Sophora ed below. at breast height, crown diameter and total tree height. The best result is presented below. 1) Relationship between biomass and diameter at breast height: 1) Relationship between biomass and diameter at breast height: B(kg ) 0.1029 dbh 2 5.122 dbh 39.912 ; R2 = 0.6028 Where B is the biomass obtained from pruning operations, dbh is the diameter at Where B is the biomass obtained from pruning operations, dbh is the diameter at breast breast height (cm). A relationship between quantity of biomass and diameter at breast height (cm). A relationship between quantity of biomass and diameter at breast height is observed in theThis quadratic model. This the variable the bestoffit, with a is observed inheight the quadratic model. variable provided best provided fit, with a value 2 0.60, what indicatespower a good power for predicting biomass; value of R =a good indicates explanatory forexplanatory predicting biomass; R2 = 0.60, what 2) Biomass calculation crown diameter anddiameter height, and at breast height. 2) Biomassfrom calculation from crown anddiameter height, and diameter at breast height. In addition, regression models for predicting residual biomass were tested from combi- In addition, regression models for predicting residual biomass were tested from combinations nations of the parameters such us diameter at breast height, crown diameter, total tree of the parameters such us diameter at breast height, crown diameter, total tree height and height and distance from soil to the crown. The best result is shown in the following distance from soil to the crown. The best result is shown in the following equation. Although did not was obtained a higher R2 value (R = 0.65), the combination of these parameters123 improve significantly the prediction model obtained from only the diameter at breast height: Magdalena Sajdak, Borja Velazquez-Marti equation. Although was obtained a higher R2 value (R = 0.65), the combination of these parameters did not improve significantly the prediction model obtained from only the diameter at breast height: 2 BB((kg hc 31 dbh 0.112431 0.0338995 H 7607900.796866 .796866 hc .5802 kg)) 6.76079 H H 31 hchc dbh 0.112431 H 2 H0.0338995 hc H hc DC .5802 ;. DC; where B B is the pruning (kg), H isHthe height (m), hc is distance where the biomass biomassobtained obtainedfrom from pruning (kg), is tree the tree height (m), hc is distance B iscrown the biomass from pruning (kg), is the tree height (m), hc is crown diameter, dbhdbh is the at breast heightheight (cm). fromWhere soil to the (m), CDisobtained is crown diameter, is diameter theHdiameter at breast (cm). from soil the crown (m),CD distance from soil to the crown (m), CD is crown diameter, dbh is the diameter at breast On the the other other hand, calculated from the apparent volume of theof crown were were On hand,prediction predictionmodels models calculated from the apparent volume the crown height (cm). also analyzed. analyzed. As ininFig. 4, 4, there is aislow linear relationship between the conical also Asobserved observed Fig. there a low linear thethe conical On the other hand, prediction models calculated from relationship the apparentbetween volume of crown 2 The same volume model and the amount of dry biomass obtained from pruning (R =0.378). 2 were also analyzed. observed in biomass Fig. 4, there is a low relationship between the The same volume model and theAs amount of dry obtained fromlinear pruning (R =0.378). result is volume obtainedmodel with parabolic model. minor difference is observed in the(R2=0.378). conical and thevolume amount of dryA biomass obtained from pruning result is obtained with parabolic volume model. A minor difference is observed in the semispheric volume model. These demonstrate low interdependence between The same result is obtained withresults parabolic volume amodel. A minor difference is observed in semispheric volume model. These results demonstrate a low interdependence between the semispheric volume model. These results demonstrate a low interdependence between mentioned parameters. mentioned mentionedparameters. parameters. 2 R = 0,378 y = 0,0806x + 11,051 2 R = 0,378 Dry biom ass (kg) Dry b io m ass (kg ) Dry b io m ass (kg ) 25 30 20 25 15 20 10 15 25 30 20 25 15 10 5 5 0 0 10 5 0 50 100 150 200 0 250 Conical volume model (m3) 0 0 50 100 150 y = 0,0543x + 13,023 R2 = 0,2949 30 Dry biom ass (kg) y = 0,0806x + 11,051 30 y = 0,0543x + 13,023 R2 = 0,2949 20 15 10 5 50 200 250 100 150 200 250 300 Semispheric volume model (m3) 0 0 50 100 150 200 Semispheric volume model (m3) model (m3) dry biomass versus conical and semispheric Fig. 4. Regression Conical modelvolume presenting volume model 250 300 Rys. 4. Model regresji suchej biomasy w zależności od wykorzystanego modelu stożkowej i półkolistej Fig.4.4.Regression Regression model presenting dry biomass and semispheric volume model Fig. model presenting dry biomass versusversus conical conical and semispheric volume model objętości Rys.4.4.Model regresji suchej biomasy w zależności od wykorzystanego modelu stożkowej Rys. Model regresji suchej biomasy w zależności od wykorzystanego modelu stożkowej i półkolistej i półkolistej objętości objętości 4. CONCLUSIONS The analysis indicates that a significant amount of residual biomass originates from pruning can be used to achieve ecological and energy targets. of Sophora japonica, and this 4.operations CONCLUSIONS 4. CONCLUSIONS The analysis indicates that a significant amount of residual biomass from pruning The total benefit of recovering utilizable biomass from urban wood waste originates is the cost avoided The analysis indicates that and a significant amount residual biomass and originates from this can be used toofachieve ecological energy operations of Sophora and ability to foresee the availability of targets. plus the market value forjaponica, the biomass. Knowledge pruning operations of Sophora japonica, and this can be used to achieve ecological and en- The benefit recovering biomass frominvestments urban wood waste is the cost avoided raw total material givesofthe possibilityutilizable to implement long-term and to introduce urban ergy targets. wood residual as arecovering reliable andutilizable source of renewable energy oravailability alternative .noteworthy Knowledge and ability to foresee the of plus the market value for the biomass The total biomass benefit of biomass from urban wood waste is the cost raw material material. avoided plusgives the market value fortothe biomass.long-term Knowledge and ability and to foresee the availraw the possibility implement investments to introduce urban ability of material the possibility to implement long-term investments and to introFromresidual an raw environmental point of view, the noteworthy increased recycling of urban wood wood biomassgives as a reliable and source ofrecovered renewable energy or alternative duce urban wood residual biomass as a reliable and noteworthy source of renewable en- residual biomass can be seen as a positive evolution because it leads to incensement of the raw material. ergy or alternative raw material. total volume of CO2 stored as wood-based products, enlarging the life-cycle of the fixed From an environmental point of view, the increased recycling of recovered urban wood carbon in the new recycled products. residual biomass can be seen as a positive evolution because it leads to incensement of the 124 total volume of CO2 stored as wood-based products, enlarging the life-cycle of the fixed carbon in the new recycled products. Estimation of pruned biomass through the adaptation of classic dendrometry... From an environmental point of view, the increased recycling of recovered urban wood residual biomass can be seen as a positive evolution because it leads to incensement of the total volume of CO2 stored as wood-based products, enlarging the life-cycle of the fixed carbon in the new recycled products. Due to the continuing expand of urban land, the increasing expansion of urban forests is predictable. Taking into account reasons of safety, aesthetics and increasing environmental awareness the case of this study is found logical and justified. REFERENCES DE LA TORRE, J. R. 2001. Árboles y arbustos de la España peninsular. Ediciones MundiPrensa. DIEGUEZ ARANDA U., BARRIO ANTA M., CASTEDO DORADO F., RUIZ GONZALEZ A. D., ALVAREZ TABOADA M. F., ALVAREZ GONZALEZ J. G., ROJO ALBORECA A. 2003. Dendrometria. Ediciones Mundi-Prensa. DRENOU C. 2006. La poda de los árboles ornamentales. Ediciones Mundi Prensa. HUSCH B., BEERS T.W., KERSHAW J. A. Jr. 2003. Forest Mensuration. John Wiley & Sons, INC. LOPEZ GONZALEZ G. A. 2010. Guía de los árboles y arbustos de la Península Ibérica y Baleares. Ediciones Mundi-Prensa. LOPEZ SERRANO F. R., GARCIA MOROTE F. A., DEL CERRO BARJA A. 2003. Dasometria ciencia de la medición forestal. Popular Libros. Mac FARLANE D.W. 2007. Quantifying urban saw timber abundance and quality in southeastern Lower Michigan, U.S.A. Arboriculture and Urban Forestry 33(4): 253–263. Mac FARLANE, D. W. 2009. Potential availability of urban wood biomass in Michigan: Implications for energy production, carbon sequestration and sustainable forest management in the U.S.A. Biomass and bioenergy 33: 628–634. Mc KEEVER D. B., SKOG K. E. 2003. Urban tree and wood yard residues another wood resource. Research note: FPL-RN-0290, USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison: 1–4. MICHAU E. 1987. La poda de los árboles ornamentales. Ediciones Mundi-Prensa. Solid Waste Association of North America. 2002. Successful approaches to recycling urban wood waste. Gen. Tech. Report. FPL-GTR-133, USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison: 1–20. VELAZQUEZ-MARTI B., FERNANDEZ-GONZALEZ E., ESTORNELL J., RUIZ L.A. 2010. Dendrometric and dasometric analysis of the bushy biomass in Mediterranean forests. Forest Ecology and Management 259: 875–882. WEST P.W. 2009. Tree and Forest Measurement. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. 125