original papers - Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Transkrypt
original papers - Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
ORIGINAL PAPERS Adv Clin Exp Med 2008, 17, 1, 15–26 ISSN 1230−025X © Copyright by Silesian Piasts University of Medicine in Wrocław BOŻENA REGULSKA−ILOW, RAFAŁ ILOW The Influence of Quercetin on Fatty−Acid Content in Selected Organs of Rats on Diets with Fresh and Oxidized Fat Wpływ kwercetyny na skład kwasów tłuszczowych w wybranych narządach szczurów doświadczalnych na diecie z tłuszczem świeżym i utlenionym Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Silesian Piasts University of Medicine in Wrocław, Poland Abstract Background. The kind and quality of dietary fat may condition the biological activity of quercetin, which is man− ifested by its influence on the activity of n−3, n−6, and n−9 metabolic pathway enzymes. Objectives. Evaluation of the effect of quercetin on fatty−acid content in the plasma and selected organs of exper− imental rats in a condition of oxidative stress due to oxidized dietary fats. Material and Methods. Using rats fed a diet with an 8% fat content and a 0.05% cholesterol supplement, the influ− ence of quercetin on the content of fatty acids in the plasma, liver, kidneys, heart, and lung was assessed. Fatty extracts from the biological material were obtained by means of the Folch method. The composition of fatty acids (as the percentage of the total level of acids) in the form of methyl esters was determined by gas chromatography using a 100−m glass capillary column. The source of pro−oxidants in the rats’ diet was either oxidized sunflower oil or oxidized lard. The four−week experiment involved 80 male Buffalo rats, of which 40 received 0.075% quercetin as a dietary supplement. Results. Quercetin affected the fatty−acid content in the investigated organs in the animals fed vegetable fat. The degree of changes depended on the quality of the fat. Fat statistically significantly changed the content of C16, C18, C18 = 2, C20 = 2, C22 = 6, and C20 = 4 fatty acids in the liver and plasma and C18 = 1 n−9 in the kidneys. The content of C18 = 2 was higher by a factor of 3.2 in the liver, 2.8 in the kidneys, plasma, and lungs, and 1.6 in the heart of rats fed on fresh oil and quercetin. A diet with oxidized oil and quercetin resulted in increases in C18 = 2 of 1.7−fold in the plasma, 1.6−fold in the liver, 1.5−fold in the lungs, 1.4−fold in the kidneys, and 1.2−fold in the heart compared with the control group. Preference of the n−9 pathway of fatty−acid synthesis was observed. Conclusions. Quercetin affected the metabolism of fatty acids in the organism when the dietary fat was rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids. Probably polyunsaturated fatty acids, with they become components of the cell mem− branes, enable quercetin to pass inside the cells of tissues and to exert the biogenic effect (Adv Clin Exp Med 2008, 17, 1, 15–26). Key words: fatty acids, oxidized fats, quercetin, rats, liver. Streszczenie Wprowadzenie. Rodzaj i jakość tłuszczu w diecie mogą warunkować aktywność biologiczną kwercetyny, przeja− wiającą się jej wpływem na aktywność enzymów szlaków metabolicznych n−3, n−6, n−9. Cel pracy. Ocena wpływu kwercetyny na skład kwasów tłuszczowych w osoczu i wybranych narządach szczurów doświadczalnych w warunkach stresu oksydacyjnego wywołanego utlenionymi tłuszczami pokarmowymi. Materiał i metody. Podawano szczurom diety z 8% zawartością tłuszczu oraz 0,5% dodatkiem cholesterolu i oce− niano wpływ kwercetyny na skład kwasów tłuszczowych w osoczu, wątrobie, nerkach, sercu i płucach. Ekstrakty tłuszczowe z materiału biologicznego otrzymano metodą Folcha. Skład kwasów tłuszczowych (jako% sumy kwa− sów) w postaci estrów metylowych oznaczono metodą chromatografii gazowej z zastosowaniem kolumny kapilar− nej szklanej o długości 100 m. Źródłem prooksydantów w diecie szczurów były utlenione: olej słonecznikowy i smalec. Czterotygodniowe doświadczenie żywieniowe przeprowadzono z udziałem 80 szczurów, samców, rasy Buffalo, których 40 otrzymywało 0.075% dodatek kwercetyny jako suplement diety. 16 B. REGULSKA−ILOW, R. ILOW Wyniki. Kwercetyna wpływała na skład kwasów tłuszczowych w wybranych narządach w grupach zwierząt kar− mionych tłuszczem roślinnym, a wielkość zmian zależała od jego jakości. W istotny statystycznie sposób zmieniał się skład następujących kwasów tłuszczowych: C16, C18, C18 = 2, C20 = 2, C22 = 6, w wątrobie i osoczu także C20 = 4, a w nerkach C18 = 1 n−9. Udział C18 = 2 zwiększył się 3,2 raza w wątrobach, 2,8 raza w nerkach, oso− czu i płucach oraz 1,6 raza w sercach szczurów karmionych olejem świeżym i kwercetyną. Na diecie z olejem utle− nionym i kwercetyną skład C18 = 2 zwiększył się 1,7 raza w osoczu, 1,6 raza w wątrobach, 1,5 raza w płucach, 1,4 raza w nerkach i 1,2 raza w sercach w stosunku do grupy kontrolnej. Obserwowano preferencję syntezy kwa− sów szlaku n−9. Wnioski. Kwercetyna wpływała na metabolizm kwasów tłuszczowych w organizmie wtedy, gdy był spożywany tłuszcz bogaty w wielonienasycone kwasy tłuszczowe. WKT, stając się składnikiem błon komórkowych, umożli− wiają kwercetynie wniknięcie do wnętrza komórek tkanek i biogenne działanie (Adv Clin Exp Med 2008, 17, 1, 15–26). Słowa kluczowe: kwasy tłuszczowe, utlenione tłuszcze, kwercetyna, szczury, wątroba. Epidemiological studies have shown that quercetin constitutes about 75% of ingested bioflavonoids and the source of its intake depends on the dietary habits of the investigated popula− tion. It is present in diets rich in vegetables, fruit, and condiments [1–7]. Quercetin is also a compo− nent of pharmaceutical products commonly used in the treatment of colds. Interest in quercetin is associated with its prevalence and widespread use as well as its extremely broad spectrum of action. It also has one of the highest antioxidative poten− tials among this group of compounds [6]. It is responsible for inhibition of the oxidation of fatty acids, which are components of phospholipids in cell membranes [12]; it also exerts a hepatoprotec− tive effect [8–11]. Quercetin has been shown to affect the activities of numerous enzymes [2, 13–18]. Its anti−inflammatory properties are the consequence of its inhibition of cyclooxygenase and lipooxygenase activity [14, 18]. Its effect on the activities of elongase and desaturase, which participate in fatty−acid metabolism, may result in a change in the fatty−acid content of tissues. Quercetin inhibits the activity of hyaluronidase and thereby shows protective properties on blood vessels [19]. Its antiatherogenic and cholagogic action has been confirmed experimentally [20]. Dietary fat affects the composition of fatty acids in the phospholipids constituting tissue cell membranes. An adequate content of polyunsatu− rated fatty acids in membrane lipids conditions their liquidity and permeability [21–23]. The lack of studies on the influence of dietary components that potentially modify the action of quercetin was the basis for designing the present experiment. It was assumed that factors that may condition the effect of quercetin include the kind (vegetable or animal) and quality (fresh or oxidized) of ingested fats. The quality of the oxidized fat added to the food was evaluated by means of its peroxide and anisidine values and the content of the polar frac− tion and it corresponded to the quality of deep−fry− ing oil from fast−food restaurants. Material and Methods The Experiment The study was carried out on eighty male Buffalo rats with initial and final body weights of 147 ± 28.3 g and 226.0 ± 28.4 g. For the four weeks of the experiment the rats were kept in appropriate conditions (room temperature, 12− hour light−dark rhythm). All procedures for the animal experiments were approved by official authorities. The animals were divided into eight groups, 10 animals per group. Forty rats had a diet that was 8% sunflower oil, with 20 receiving oxidized oil and 20 fresh oil. Ten of the former and 10 of the latter had quercetin as a supplement to their diet. The other 40 rats had a diet that was 8% lard, with 20 receiving oxidized lard and 20 fresh lard. Ten of the former and 10 of the latter also had the quercetin supplement. The supplement came to 0.75 g per kilo of diet (Quercetin Dihydrate reagent, Fluka, cat. No. 83370). The diet was pre− pared according to the method described in [24]. The rats had unlimited access to the diet and to water. Their consumption of diet and water was checked every two days and their body mass mea− sured once a week. Preparation of Oxidized Fat for Use as an Ingredient of the Diet Two equal portions of pork lard and two of refined sunflower oil were made up. One portion of each was kept fresh, while the other was sub− jected to thermal oxidation. The oxidation process was carried out by heating the fat under a quartz lamp for 65 hours. A 2.5−cm thick layer of fat was placed in a porcelain dish, 21 x 29 cm. The quartz lamp was kept 14 cm from the surface of the fat. The initial temperature of the fat was 50°C and its 17 The Influence of Quercetin on Fatty−Acid Content in Selected Rat Organs Table 1. Fatty−acid composition, expressed as the percentage of total fatty−acid content, and quality indicators for the fresh and oxidized fats added to the rats’ fodder Tabela 1. Skład kwasów tłuszczowych (jako udział procentowy w puli wszystkich kwasów) i wskaźniki jakości tłuszczu świeżego i utlenionego dodawanego do diety Analysed indicator (Badane wskaźniki) Fresh lard (Świeży smalec) Oxidized lard (Utleniony smalec) Fresh sunflower oil (Świeży olej słonecznikowy) Oxidized sunflower oil (Utleniony olej słonecznikowy) Peroxide value (Liczba nadtlenkowa) meg O2/kg mg O2/100 g fat 1.5 ± 0.0 0.046 169.3 ± 0.2 5.28 3.4 ± 0.0 0.107 666.7 ± 0.0 20.8 Anisidine value (Liczba anizydynowa) 0.5 ± 0.2 39.1 ± 0.4 4.5 ± 0.0 68.8 ± 0.8 Polar fraction [%] (Frakcja polarna) 1.3 16.9 2.1 36.5 Saturated acids (Kwasy nasycone) 43.3 43.6 8.6 24.5 Monounsaturated acids (Kwasy jednonienasycone) 45.1 45.5 22.3 30.6 Polyunsaturated acids (Kwasy wielonienasycone) 10.7 9.8 68.2 42.9 Unidentified acids (Kwasy niezidentyfikowane) 0.9 1.1 0.9 2.0 Fatty acid type sum (Suma kwasów tłuszczowych) final temperature was not higher than 75°C. The oxidation conditions were established based on the work of Ziemlański et al. [25]. In the fresh and oxidized fats, the content of the polar fraction was determined, and the fatty−acid component and the content of the primary and secondary products of oxidation were measured as the peroxide and ani− sidine values (Table 1). Extraction of Lipid Components From the Investigated Material According to the Folch Method [26] After being weighed and ground, the individ− ual organs were homogenized with 10 ml of a chloroform:methanol mixture (2:1). The extract with sediment was transferred to 100−ml bottles and shaken mechanically for 5 minutes and then centrifuged for 10 minutes. The chloroform: methanol extract was transferred to a separator and the residue was shaken again with 10 ml of the extracting mixture, chloroform:methanol (2 : 1) and centrifuged. Then the chloroform:methanol extracts collected in the separator were treated with 15 ml of a 0.9% solution of potassium chlo− ride, hand shaken, and left for separation of the layers. The lower, chloroform layer was collected in Erlenmeyer flasks containing anhydrous sodium sulfate, dried for 24 hours, and filtered into bottles. The extracts were stored at +4°C in dark, tightly closed, 50−ml bottles. Determination of the Percentage of Fatty Acids in Extracts From Plasma and Organs by Gas Chromatography The composition of fatty acids in the form of methyl esters was determined by means of gas chromatography using the 6890 N with Agilent ChemStation, version A.8.03 (Agilent Techno− logies) with a 100−m glass capillary column 0.25 in diameter and a stationary phase of CP−Sil 88. Identification of the acids was performed by com− paring their retention times with standards. The content of the particular fatty acids and their iso− mers was expressed as a percentage of the total fat. Stage I The chloroform extract was collected into an estrification tube and chloroform was evaporated with a nitrogen stream in a glycerin bath at 70°C. The mixture was treated with 1 ml of 2 M KOH in 18 B. REGULSKA−ILOW, R. ILOW 75% methanol. The test tube was sealed with a stopper and heated for 60 minutes at 70°C. After cooling, 1 ml of hexane was added. After 5 minutes of shaking, the hexane layer was discarded and the extraction process was repeated. Then 1 ml of 2 M aqueous HCl solution was added and heated for 30 minutes in a tightly sealed test tube in a glycerin bath. After cooling, the contents were treated with 1 ml of hexane and a saturated solution of NaCl so that the hexane layer was in the narrowing of the estrification tube. After 5 minutes of shaking, the hexane solution was collected with a Pasteur pipette into vials containing anhydrous sodium sulfate. The extraction was repeated with another 1 ml of hexane. The combined hexane solutions were dried for 24 hours by anhydrous sodium sulfate. Stage II The dried hexane solution was transferred to the estrification tube and evaporated with a nitro− gen stream in a glycerin bath at 70°C. After the complete evaporation of hexane, the mixture was treated with 1 ml of 0.5 M KOH in anhydrous methanol, sealed with a stopper, and heated for 30 minutes at 70°C. After cooling, 1 ml of a 1.25 M HCl solution in anhydrous methanol was added and heated again in a tightly sealed test tube. After cooling, the mixture was treated with 1 ml of hexane and a saturated NaCl solution so that the hexane layer was in the narrowing of the tube. After 5 minutes of shaking, the hexane solution was collected with a Pasteur pipette into vials containing anhydrous sodium sulfate. The extraction was repeated with another 1 ml of hexane. The solution was left to evaporate over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solution which was above the sodium sulfate was transferred to a test tube and condensed by evaporation with a nitrogen stream. The solution, condensed to about 0.02 ml, was injected into the chromatograph at an amount of 0.001 ml. The percent content of fatty acids was calcu− lated as the quotient of the peaks and the distance from the solvent fronting. Statistical Assessment of the Results The normality of the distribution in the exam− ined groups was assessed with Shapiro− Wilk’s W test. By lack of a normal distribution, logarithmic transformation was applied. The sig− nificance of the differences between the average values for the examined groups was assessed using one−way analysis of variance (p < 0.05). Data were tested for homogeneity of variances with Levene’s test. To assess the influence of differ− ences on the analysis of variance (the average post hoc comparison), Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference test (HSD) was applied. The Cochran− Cox test was used in cases of a normal distribution of variables but a lack of homogeneity of the vari− ance. The non−parametric Kruskal−Wallis test was used for comparisons in cases of a lack of a normal distribution and a lack of homogeneity of variance of the variables. All the statistical calculations were done with STATISTICA 6.0 PL (StatSoft Inc., USA). Results Fat Added to the Diet (Table 1) As a result of oxidation, the peroxide value increased 194−fold in sunflower oil and 114−fold in lard. The anisidine value increased after oxidation 15 times in sunflower oil and 65 times in lard. The applied experimental conditions of fat oxidation resulted in a significant decomposition of polyun− saturated fatty acids in the sunflower oil, their con− tent in oxidized oil falling by 25%. The composi− tion of fatty acids in oxidized lard changed only slightly in relation to the composition in its fresh counterpart. The content of the polar fraction in fats increased due to oxidation from 1.3 to 23.9% in lard and from 2.1 to 42.3% in oil, i.e. 18.4 and 20.1 times, respectively. The Effect of Quercetin on the Percent Content of Fatty Acids in Selected Tissues in Experimental Rats (Tables 2 and 3) The influence of quercetin on the content of fatty acids in the selected organs was observed in the groups of animals fed on a diet containing oil, the range of changes correlating with the quality of the fat. It involved mainly the n−6, n−3, and n−9 metabolic pathways and statistically significantly changed the content of the fatty acids in the inves− tigated organs: C16, C18, C18 = 2, C20 = 2, C22 = 6, and C20 = 4 in plasma and liver and C18 = 1, n−9, in the kidneys. Under the effect of quercetin a 3.2−fold increase in the content of linoleic acid (C18 = 2, n−6) was observed in the liver, 2.8−fold in the kidneys, plasma, and lung, and 1.6−fold in the hearts of the rats fed fresh oil. In the group of animals receiving oxidized oil and quercetin, the content of C18 = 2 was higher by a factor of 1.7 in the plasma, 1.6 in 20.7 ± 1.0 13.1 ± 1.8 19.3 ± 2.8 3.3 ± 0.4 9.7 ± 1.5 1.0 ± 0.6 19.6 ± 2.7 4.1 ± 1.0 26.2 ± 0.7 6.2 ± 1.0 33.3 ± 2.2 3.8 ± 0.3 8.9 ± 0.8 0.2 ± 0.0 4.9 ± 0.7 0.3 ± 0.1 21.1 ± 0.3 8.3 ± 0.7 29.9 ± 1.5 3.5 ± 0.1 10.4 ± 0.5 1.0 ± 0.0 13.7 ± 0.6 1.5 ± 0.1 Kidneys (Nerki) C16 C18 C18 = n9 C18 = n7 C18 = 2 C20 = 2 C20 = 4 C22 = 6 Plasma (Osocze) C16 C18 C18 = n9 C18 = n7 C18 = 2 C20 = 2 C20 = 4 C22 = 6 Control oil – group 1 (Olej – grupa 1 kontrolna) Liver (Wątroba) C16 C18 C18 = n9 C18 = n7 C18 = 2 C20 = 2 C20 = 4 C22 = 6 Fatty acids (Kwasy tłuszczowe) 20.9 ± 0.2 9.0 ± 0.3 34.5 ± 0.5 4.0 ± 0.3 8.7 ± 0.7 1.7 ± 0.1 7.2 ± 0.3 1.1 ± 0.1 27.9 ± 1.3 5.7 ± 0.9 37.6 ± 2.3 4.7 ± 0.6 3.7 ± 0.6 0.3 ± 0.1 4.1 ± 1.0 0.3 ± 0.1 21.9 ± 1.7 6.7 ± 0.8 29.4 ± 2.0 4.2 ± 0.4 7.6 ± 0.7 1.5 ± 0.4 10.6 ± 2.1 3.3 ± 0.7 Control lard – group 2 (Smalec – grupa 2 kontrolna) 19.1 ± 0.5 7.2 ± 0.6 21.0 ± 1.4 3.3 ± 0.2 28.8 ± 2.3 0.1 ± 0.1 9.0 ± 0.4 0.6 ± 0.1 23.1 ± 1.1 4.1 ± 0.7 26.1 ± 1.3 2.9 ± 0.2 24.6 ± 1.3 0.1 ± 0.0 4.7 ± 0.8 0.2 ± 0.0 17.9 ± 1.2 6.3 ± 1.4 18.2 ± 2.1 3.4 ± 0.2 31.0 ± 1.6 0.4 ± 0.1 12.0 ± 2.5 1.3 ± 0.2 Oil + quercetin – group 3 (Olej + kwerce− tyna – grupa 3) 20.8 ± 0.2 7.7 ± 0.3 33.7 ± 1.0 4.2 ± 0.2 11.4 ± 1.0 0.7 ± 0.0 8.3 ± 0.2 1.2 ± 0.0 26.8 ± 1.1 5.1 ± 0.8 37.6 ± 2.2 4.9 ± 0.5 4.6 ± 0.6 0.2 ± 0.0 4.1 ± 0.8 0.3 ± 0.0 21.4 ± 0.9 8.7 ± 2.2 29.1 ± 2.5 4.5 ± 0.5 8.5 ± 1.5 0.7 ± 0.3 11.3 ± 2.1 3.0 ± 0.6 Lard + quercetin – group 4 (Smalec + kwer− cetyna – grupa 4) 21.3 ± 0.3 9.1 ± 0.3 28.7 ± 0.3 3.5 ± 0.0 10.3 ± 0.1 0.9 ± 0.6 14.8 ± 0.3 1.6 ± 0.0 24.7 ± 1.3 4.5 ± 0.5 31.8 ± 1.8 4.0 ± 0.2 9.0 ± 1.2 0.2 ± 0.1 5.4 ± 1.0 0.4 ± 0.1 20.3 ± 1.3 10.9 ± 1.5 18.3 ± 2.2 3.4 ± 0.4 10.5 ± 2.1 1.2 ± 0.6 20.3 ± 3.4 5.0 ± 0.5 Oxidized oil – group 5 (Olej utleniony – grupa 5) 21.6 ± 0.3 8.5 ± 0.3 34.8 ± 0.3 3.6 ± 0.3 9.3 ± 0.2 1.7 ± 0.0 7.9 ± 0.2 1.1 ± 0.0 28.8 ± 0.7 5.0 ± 0.8 35.1 ± 1.7 4.2 ± 0.2 4.2 ± 0.6 0.2 ± 0.0 3.6 ± 0.3 0.3 ± 0.0 22.8 ± 1.9 8.6 ± 1.4 29.3 ± 2.7 4.1 ± 0.4 7.3 ± 1.0 1.4 ± 0.6 10.1 ± 2.9 2.8 ± 0.8 Oxidized lard – group 6 (Smalec utle− niony – grupa 6) Tabela 2. Wpływ różnych rodzajów diety na skład kwasów tłuszczowych (%) w wybranych narządach szczurów laboratoryjnych (x ± SD) Table 2. The influence of the kind of diet on fatty−acid content (%) in selected organs of laboratory rats (X ± SD) 21.6 ± 0.3 7.9 ± 0.4 26.9 ± 0.3 3.4 ± 0.1 17.6 ± 0.4 0.2 ± 0.0 10.8 ± 0.2 1.0 ± 0.1 27.3 ± 1.3 5.3 ± 1.2 29.4 ± 1.8 3.5 ± 0.3 13.0 ± 1.5 0.1 ± 0.0 4.8 ± 1.3 0.3 ± 0.0 20.3 ± 1.2 9.7 ± 1.4 17.2 ± 1.7 3.4 ± 0.27 17.0 ± 1.4 0.3 ± 0.1 18.3 ± 2.5 3.2 ± 0.4 Oxidized oil + quercetin – group 7 (Olej utleniony + kwercetyna – grupa 7) 22.1 ± 0.1 8.8 ± 0.3 33.7 ± 0.6 4.1 ± 0.2 10.2 ± 0.2 1.0 ± 0.0 7.4 ± 0.2 1.0 ± 0.1 28.3 ± 0.7 5.3 ± 0.8 35.2 ± 1.2 4.5 ± 0.3 4.7 ± 0.5 0.2 ± 0.1 4.2 ± 0.8 0.3 ± 0.1 22.5 ± 0.9 6.6 ± 0.9 30.0 ± 1.9 4.1 ± 0.3 8.8 ± 1.1 0.8 ± 0.3 9.7 ± 1.5 2.6 ± 0.3 Oxidized lard + quercetin – group 8 (Smalec utleniony + kwercetyna – grupa 8) The Influence of Quercetin on Fatty−Acid Content in Selected Rat Organs 19 15.4 ± 2.1 9.3 ± 1.5 13.1 ± 3.3 4.1 ± 0.1 18.0 ± 2.1 0.2 ± 0.1 20.6 ± 4.1 6.1 ± 1.4 29.8 ± 0.5 6.8 ± 0.4 32.1 ± 2.0 4.4 ± 0.2 6.4 ± 0.5 0.2 ± 0.0 3.6 ± 0.7 0.3 ± 0.1 Lungs (Płuca) C16 C18 C18 = n9 C18 = n7 C18 = 2 C20 = 2 C20 = 4 C22 = 6 Control oil – group 1 (Olej – grupa 1 kontrolna) Heart (Serce) C16 C18 C18 = n9 C18 = n7 C18 = 2 C20 = 2 C20 = 4 C22 = 6 Fatty acids (Kwasy tłuszczowe) 29.7 ± 1.1 6.1 ± 0.4 36.3 ± 1.6 5.1 ± 0.4 2.8 ± 0.3 0.1 ± 0.0 2.9 ± 0.6 0.3 ± 0.1 13.9 ± 1.5 7.4 ± 0.6 15.3 ± 2.5 4.7 ± 0.2 15.6 ± 1.2 1.0 ± 0.3 21.8 ± 2.6 7.7 ± 1.1 Control lard – group 2 (Smalec – grupa 2 kontrolna) 27.1 ± 1.2 5.6 ± 0.9 27.9 ± 2.6 3.6 ± 1.0 17.9 ± 1.3 0.3 ± 0.1 3.2 ± 1.1 0.2 ± 0.1 12.7 ± 1.7 7.4 ± 0.6 10.8 ± 2.5 3.5 ± 0.3 28.6 ± 1.0 0.1 ± 0.0 19.7 ± 3.0 5.5 ± 1.4 Oil + quercetin – group 3 (Olej + kwerce− tyna – grupa 3) 29.4 ± 0.8 4.9 ± 0.5 36.7 ± 2.2 4.9 ±0.3 3.9 ±0.7 0.1 ± 0.0 3.8 ± 1.1 0.4 ± 0.1 15.3 ± 2.2 8.3 ± 1.1 16.1 ± 4.1 4.5 ± 0.2 14.9 ± 2.3 0.5 ± 0.2 20.2 ± 3.5 6.8 ±1.2 Lard + quercetin – group 4 (Smalec + kwer− cetyna – grupa 4) 29.1 ±0.7 5.0 ± 0.7 30.5 ± 1.6 4.8 ± 0.3 6.5 ± 0.9 0.1 ±0.0 3.9 ± 0.5 0.4 ± 0.1 16.0 ± 1.3 8.4 ± 0.6 14.9 ± 2.4 4.1 ± 0.3 18.3 ± 1.6 0.5 ± 0.2 18.4 ± 2.3 6.5 ± 1.2 Oxidized oil – group 5 (Olej utleniony – grupa 5) 29.4 ± 1.3 5.0 ± 0.7 32.7 ± 2.9 4.6 ± 0.2 4.7 ± 1.3 0.1 ± 0.0 3.4 ± 1.3 0.3 ± 0.1 17.7 ± 3.8 7.9 ± 2.0 19.5 ± 6.0 3.9 ± 0.4 13.3 ± 3.3 0.6 ± 0.2 16.4 ± 5.4 5.8 ± 2.0 Oxidized lard – group 6 (Smalec utle− niony – grupa 6) Tabela 2. Wpływ różnych rodzajów diety na skład kwasów tłuszczowych (%) w wybranych narządach szczurów laboratoryjnych (x ± SD) – cd. Table 2. The influence of the kind of diet on fatty−acid content (%) in selected organs of laboratory rats (X ± SD) – continued 29.3 ± 0.6 5.3 ± 0.9 29.5 ± 2.6 4.0 ± 0.3 9.9 ± 1.2 0.2 ± 0.0 3.8 ± 1.0 0.3 ± 0.1 15.8 ± 2.9 7.4 ± 1.1 14.8 ± 4.5 3.4 ± 0.3 22.8 ± 2.7 0.1 ± 0.0 16.9 ± 4.3 5.5 ± 1.4 Oxidized oil + quercetin – group 7 (Olej utleniony + kwercetyna – grupa 7) 29.2 ± 1.1 4.5 ± 0.4 32.1 ± 1.8 4.7 ± 0.2 4.6 ± 0.8 0.1 ± 0.0 3.4 ± 0.9 0.3 ± 0.1 14.8 ± 1.7 7.5 ± 0.7 14.7 ± 2.9 3.8 ± 0.1 16.0 ± 1.9 0.5 ± 0.2 20.6 ± 2.8 7.7 ± 1.0 Oxidized lard + quercetin – group 8 (Smalec utleniony + kwercetyna – grupa 8) 20 B. REGULSKA−ILOW, R. ILOW 21 The Influence of Quercetin on Fatty−Acid Content in Selected Rat Organs Table 3. Comparison of the effect of a diet with oil on the percent content of fatty acids in selected organ of experimental rats; significance of differences Tabela 3. Porównanie wpływu diety z olejem na skład kwasów tłuszczowych w wybranych narządach szczurów doświad− czalnych, różnice istotne statystycznie Fatty acids (Kwasy tłuszczowe) Group 1 vs. 3 (Grupa 1 vs 3) Group 3 vs. 7 (Grupa 3 vs 7) Group 1 vs. 5 (Grupa 1 vs 5) Group 5 vs. 7 (Grupa 5 vs 7) Liver (Wątroba) C16 C18 C18 = 2 C20 = 2 C20 = 4 C22 = 6 0.0003 0.0001 0.0001 0.0000² 0.0001 0.0000¹ 0.0024 0.0002 0.0001 ns.² 0.0001 0.0044¹ ns. 0.0291 ns. ns.² ns. ns.¹ ns. ns. 0.0001 0.0000² ns. ns.¹ Kidneys (Nerki) C16 C18 C18 = 1n9 C18 = 2 C20 = 2 C22 = 6 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0000² 0.0001 0.0001 0.0346 0.0007 0.0001 ns.² 0.0002 0.0313 0.0013 ns. 0.0046 0.0046² ns. 0.0001 ns. 0.0489 0.0001 0.0000² 0.0077 Plasma (Osocze) C16 C18 C18 = 1n9 C18 = 2 C20 = 2 C20 = 4 C22 = 6 0.0001 0.0003 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.0001 ns. ns. 0.0001 0.0003 ns. ns. 0.0291 ns. ns. ns. ns. ns. ns. ns. ns. 0.0024 ns. 0.0001 0.0346 0.0001 0.0001 Heart (Serce) C16 C18 C18 = 2 C20 = 2 0.0489 0.0346 0.0001 0.0489 0.0346 ns. 0.0077 ns. ns. ns. ns. ns. ns. ns. 0.0346 0.0001 Lung (Płuca) C16 C16 = 1 C18 C18 = 1n7 C18 = 2 C20 = 2 C22 = 6 0.0003¹ ns. 0.0014² ns.¹ 0.0001² 0.0000² 0.0440 0.0478 ns.¹ ns.² ns.¹ 0.0000² 0.0015² ns.¹ ns.¹ 0.0178¹ 0.0001² ns.¹ ns.² ns.² ns.¹ ns.¹ ns.¹ ns.² 0.0059 0.0001² 0.0155² ns.¹ ns. – insignificant differences. ns. – różnica nieistotna statystycznie. ¹ Kruskal-Wallis test. ¹ Test Kruskala-Wallisa. ² Cochran-Cox test. ² Test Cochrana-Coxa. the livers, 1.5 in the lungs, 1.4 in the kidneys, and 1.2 in the hearts compared with the control group. Fig. 1 illustrates the changes in the content of C18 = 2 fatty acid in the investigated organs. The liver and plasma of the rats on a diet with fresh oil revealed decreased arachidonic acid (C20 = 4, n−6) content in all the fatty acids, by a factor of 1.5 in the liver and 0.7 in the plasma. A similar effect of quercetin was observed in animals fed fodder containing oxidized oil, but it was twofold lower. The accumulation of linoleic acid did not significantly affect the content of arachidonic acid in the lungs, hearts, and kidneys (Fig. 2). Decreases in the content of all the products of the n−9 metabolic pathway, i.e. C18, C18 = 1, and C20 = 2, were observed in the organs of the ani− mals on diets containing quercetin compared with controls. The content of stearic acid (C18), the ini− tial substrate of metabolism, decreased twofold in the livers, by about 20% in the hearts and lungs, 13% in the plasma, and 25% in the kidneys of the animals receiving fresh oil with quercetin. The kid− 22 B. REGULSKA−ILOW, R. ILOW 35 Fig. 1. Comparison of the effect of quercetin on C18 = 2 acid content in selected organs of rats on a diet with oil 30 25 20 Ryc. 1. Porównanie wpły− wu kwercetyny na skład kwasu C18 = 2 w wybra− nych narządach szczurów na diecie z olejem 15 10 5 0 fresh oil świeży olej lungs płuca fresh oil + quercetin świeży olej + kwercetyna kidney nerki oxidized oil utleniony olej liver wątroba oxidized oil + quercetin utleniony olej + kwercetyna plasma osocze heart serce 25 Fig. 2. Comparison of the effect of quercetin on C20 = 4 acid content in selected organs of rats on a diet with oil 20 15 10 5 0 fresh oil świeży olej lungs płuca fresh oil + quercetin świeży olej + kwercetyna kidneys nerki oxidized oil utleniony olej liver wątroba oxidized oil + quercetin utleniony olej + kwercetyna plasma osocze Ryc. 2. Porównanie wpływu kwercetyny na skład kwasu C20 = 4 w wybranych narządach szczurów na diecie z olejem heart serce 1.4 Fig. 3. Comparison of the effect of quercetin on C20 = 2 acid content in selected organs of rats on a diet with oil 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 fresh oil świeży olej lungs płuca fresh oil + quercetin świeży olej + kwercetyna kidney nerki oxidized oil utleniony olej liver wątroba neys also showed a 22% decreased content of oleic acid (C18 = 1), which was also 1.2 times lower in the hearts and lungs compared with controls. Moreover, quercetin affected the content of an indirect product of n−9 acid metabolism, i.e. plasma osocze oxidized oil + quercetin utleniony olej + kwercetyna Ryc. 3. Porównanie wpływu kwercetyny na skład kwasu C20 = 2 w wybranych narządach szczurów na diecie z olejem heart serce eicosadienoic acid (C20 = 2), in the investigated organs regardless of the quality and kind of fat added to the animals’ diet. The content of C20 = 2 fatty acid in the liver and kidney of animals receiv− ing fresh oil was decreased by a factor of 2.5, in The Influence of Quercetin on Fatty−Acid Content in Selected Rat Organs the plasma by 10, and in the hearts by about 5 under the effect of flavonoid. On the other hand, changes in the content of C20 = 2 acid in the lungs, where a twofold increase was observed, revealed a reverse trend. In the livers of the animals fed oxi− dized oil and quercetin, the content of C20 = 2 acid was four times lower and in the kidneys two times lower (Fig. 3). The content of eicosadienoic acid in the livers of the animals receiving fodder with lard and quercetin was 2 times lower, in the kidneys 1.5 times lower, in the plasma 2.4 times lower, and in the hearts 2.0 times lower. The livers of the ani− mals fed fodder containing oxidized lard and quercetin showed a 1.75 times lower content of C20 = 2, in the plasma the levels were 1.7 times lower, and in the hearts 5 times lower. The effect of quercetin observed under the experimental con− ditions on the content of C20 = 2 fatty acid in the organs of the animals fed fodder containing lard may result from the high participation of oleic acid, a substrate of the n−9 fatty−acid metabolic pathway, in the fat (Fig. 4). The addition of quercetin resulted in a decrease in the content of C16 acid in the livers, kidneys, lungs, and plasma of the rats fed fresh oil. The kidneys also revealed an increased content of palmitic acid in the group of animals fed oxidized oil with the addition of quercetin, which was 11% higher than in the control group. The livers and kidneys of the animals receiv− ing fodder with fresh oil and quercetin revealed a decreased in the C22 = 6/C18 = 3α index com− pared with the control group. Its value was 7 times lower in the liver and 2 times lower in the kidneys. The acid content ratio proves the activity of the n− 3 metabolic pathway enzymes, i.e. the synthesis of docosahexaenoic acid from linolenic acid. Inhibition of the activity of the enzyme ∆−6 desat− urase by quercetin in the rats’ livers caused a twofold increase in the content of C18 = 3α acid. Accumulation of the acid in the liver resulted in a threefold decrease in the content of C22 = 6 acid, while in the kidneys the level of docosahexaenoic acid fell by a factor of 1.5. The Effect of the Quality of the Fat Added to the Diet on the Fatty Acid Levels in Rat Tissues (Tables 2 and 3) Statistically significant differences in the level of fatty acids in the liver between the groups receiving fresh and oxidized oil were observed in case of C18 acid and consequently in the total level of saturated fats. The content of stearic acid 23 decreased by 17% in livers, 27% in the kidneys, and 26% in the lungs of the rats receiving oxidized oil compared with the control group. Some kidneys also revealed other statistically significant changes in the content of fatty acids occurring under the effect of modified vegetable fat. The observations demonstrated decreased lev− els of C16 and C18 acids and the total content of saturated fats and an increased content of C20 = 2 acid. The quality of the lard added to the rats’ diet affected only the content of C20 = 2 acid in the kidneys. Its level was decreased by about 27% in the group of animals fed oxidized lard. Discussion The content of the polar fraction in the oxi− dized fats added to the diet of the rats in this exper− iment disqualified oil as suitable for consumption. The content of polar compounds exceeded the acceptable level, which is 25%. Frying fat reaches this value after 5–6 days of use in the same deep− fat fryer [28]. The polar fraction has a fluid con− sistency and under home or restaurant conditions its removal from fat is impossible. It is absorbed into or adsorbed onto the surface of the fried prod− uct and thus it becomes a dietary component. The polar fraction decreases the digestibility of dietary fat, but it is the ingestion of the products of lipid peroxide metabolism that endangers our health. The content of the primary and secondary products of fatty−acid oxidation, evaluated by means of the peroxide and anisidine values, in the oxidized fats added to the diet increased significantly. The prod− ucts of fat oxidation destroy the cell structure and impair its functioning. Peroxides may damage intestinal mucous membrane, and aldehydes and other secondary products of oxidation may exert a toxic effect on animals’ organs [27, 29]. Under the experimental conditions, an effect of quercetin on the content of fatty acids in the inves− tigated organs was observed in the group of ani− mals on diets which included oil, and the range of changes correlated with the quality of the oil, it being lower in a diet with oxidized fat. Sunflower oil contains primarily polyunsaturated fatty acids, which increase its liquidity and membrane perme− ability. Under the experimental conditions, oil con− tained four times more polyunsaturated acids, even after oxidation, than lard. The change in cell mem− brane permeability caused in the experiment by the kind of fat added to the diet probably conditioned the activity of quercetin or its lack. Lard contains mainly saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids which, after being embedded into cell membranes, increase their rigidity and decrease permeability. 24 B. REGULSKA−ILOW, R. ILOW Table 4. Comparison of the effect of a diet with lard on the percent content of fatty acids in selected organ of experimental rats; significance of differences Tabela 4. Porównanie wpływu diety ze smalcem na udział kwasów tłuszczowych w wybranych narządach szczurów doświadczalnych, różnice istotne statystycznie Fatty acids (Kwasy tłuszczowe) Group 2 vs. 4 (Grupa 2 vs 4) Group 4 vs. 8 (Grupa 2 vs 4) Group 2 vs. 6 (Grupa 2 vs 4) Group 6 vs. 8 (Grupa 2 vs 4) Liver (Wątroba) C18 C20 = 2 ns. 0.0010² 0.0331 ns² ns. ns² ns. 0.0007² Kidneys (Nerki) C16 C18 = 2 C20 = 2 ns 0.0009 0.0002² 0.0404 ns. ns.² ns. ns. 0.0092² ns. ns. ns.² Lung (Płuca) C18 = 2 C20 = 2 0.0026 ns.² ns.² ns.² 0.0050² 0.0009² ns.² ns.² Plasma (Osocze) C20 = 2 0.0001 ns. ns. 0.0001 Heart (Serce) C20 = 2 0.0050 ns. ns. ns. ns – insignificant differences. ns. – różnica nieistotna statystycznie. ¹ Kruskal-Wallis test. ¹ Test Kruskala-Wallisa. ² Cochran-Cox test. ² Test Cochrana-Coxa. The liver is the main organ of metabolic changes in the organism; changes in the fatty−acid content were thus more pronounced in this organ than in the others. The observed changes in the content of individual fatty acids from the main metabolic pathways in the investigated organs were probably a consequence of the inhibitory effect of quercetin on the activities of ∆−6 desat− urase and elongases. Especially the blockade of C18 = 2 acid metabolism to fatty acids with a higher number of unsaturated bonds and longer hydrocarbon chains, e.g. arachidonic acid, was explicitly visible. The consequence of linoleic acid accumulation included a 1.5−fold decrease in the content of arachidonic acid in the liver and plasma. In the remaining organs the increase in C18 = 2 acid content was not accompanied by an altered content of C20 = 4 acid. The above changes con− cerned only animals on a diet containing fresh oil. The C20 = 4/C18 = 2 index determined in the plas− ma reflects the metabolism of acids in the liver and informs about the activity of enzymes participat− ing in the biosynthesis of arachidonic acid from linoleic acid [30]. The metabolism of linoleic acid and arachidonic acid in the hearts, kidneys, and lungs had a similar course. Under the experimental conditions, inhibition of the metabolism of acids belonging to the n−6 and n−3 pathway led to a preference for the n−9 pathway of acid synthesis. This was a conse− quence of metabolic competition for enzymes par− ticipating in the metabolism of acids from these pathways. [31, 32]. Linoleic and α−linolenic acids, substrates of the metabolism of acids from the n−6 and n−3 family, must be delivered with diet, while precursors for the synthesis of the n−9 pathway acids may come from resynthesis in the organism, as mammals’ cells are able to produce only those unsaturated fatty acids which have the double− bond situated near carbon 9, starting from the methyl group. A high content of linoleic acid, γ−linolenic, dihomo−γ−linolenic, or arachidonic acids in the diet leads to the inhibition of oleate desaturation, which results from a competition for ∆−6 desaturase [31]. Lack of an effect of quercetin in rats fed lard (except for C20 = 2 metabolism) and its presence in the groups receiving oil was probably associat− ed with the permeability of cell membranes, which correlates with the composition of dietary fat. The high content of polyunsaturated fats in sunflower oil increased its liquidity and the permeability of cell membranes, which enabled quercetin to pene− trate into the cells and exert a biogenic effect. Changes in the content of fatty acids in the organs of the animals on diet with fresh oil and quercetin were more pronounced than those in the rats receiving oxidized oil, probably due to the fact that the fatty−acid polymers which were formed during oxidation decreased the digestion of fat. From available literature it can be seen that quercetin affects the metabolism of fatty acids by changing the activity of numerous enzymes, e.g. elongase and desaturase, lipooxygenase, cyclooxy− genase. Information concerning the direction of fatty−acid metabolism is ambiguous and it seems to depend on the experimental conditions [33–35]. Factors which may affect the range and direction of metabolism include the kind and amount of dietary fat, the kind and amount of flavonoid, the animal species, as well as the duration of the experiment. The above factors caused the changes in fatty−acid content in the livers of the experimental animals observed under the effect of bioflavonoid by other authors to be ambiguous [33, 36, 37]. The content of C18 and C16 acids in the liver of rats receiving a diet with fat rich in polyunsaturated fats decreased, while the content of C18 = 2 and C20 = The Influence of Quercetin on Fatty−Acid Content in Selected Rat Organs 4 acids increased [33]. Changes in the content of these acids were similar to those observed in the present experiment, except for C20 = 4. In the present experiment a blockade of n−6 and n−3 pathway of acid metabolism under the effect of quercitin, with a preference for the syn− thesis of n−9 pathway acids, was observed. A similar effect of the quality of fat (fresh or oxidized) on fatty−acid content in the livers of the animals as observed in the present experiment was described by Lopez−Varela et al. [36] and Ammouche et al. [37]. The observed changes in the fatty−acid content correlated positively with the content of the polar fraction in the oxidized fat. The composition of fatty acids in numerous 25 tissues, especially in the liver, reflects their content in the diet [2]. Such an effect of oxidized oil on fatty−acid content was not observed in the present experiment. In conclusion, quercetin, a natural component of diet or its supplement, affects fatty−acid metab− olism in the organism on consumption of fat rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids. Polyunsaturated fatty acids, which become components of cell membranes, enable quercetin to penetrate into tis− sue cells and exert a biogenic effect. Patients administered pharmaceutical products containing quercetin and also consuming products which con− tain quercitin should therefore be recommended to ingest oils or soft margarine. References [1] Ross JA, Kasum CM: Dietary flavonoids: bioavailability, metabolic effects and safety. Ann Rev Nutr 2002, 22, 19–34. [2] Aherne SA, O’Brien NM: Dietary flavonols: chemistry, food content and metabolism. Nutrition 2002, 18, 75–81. [3] Arai Y, Watanabe S, Kimira M, Shimoi K, Mochizuki R, Kinae N: Dietary intakes of flavonols, flavones and isoflavones by Japanese women and the inverse correlation between quercetin intake and plasma LDL cholesterol concentration. J Nutr 2000, 130, 2243–2250. [4] Geleijnse JM, Launer LJ, Hofman A, Pols HAP, Witteman JCM: Tea flavonoids may protect against athero− sclerosis: The Rotterdam study. Arch Intern Med 1999, 159, 2170–2174. [5] De Vries JHM, Janssen K, Hollman PCH, Van Staveren WA, Katan MB: Consumption of quercetin and ka− empferol in free living subject eating a variety of diets. Cancer Lett 1997, 114, 141–144. [6] Erlund I: Review of flavonoids quercetin, hesperetin,and naringenin. Dietary sources, bioactivities, bioavailabi− lity, and epidemiology. Nutr Res 2004, 24, 851–874. [7] Nuutila AM, Puupponen−Prima R, Aarni M, Oksman−Caldentey KY: Comparison of antioxidant activities of onion and garlic extracts by inhibition of lipid peroxidation and radical scavenging activity. Food Chem 2003, 81, 485–493. [8] Peres W, Tunon MJ, Collado PSHerrmann S, Marroni N, Gonzalez−Gallego J: The flavonoid quercetin ame− liorates liver damage in rats with biliary obstruction. J Hepatol 2000, 33, 742–750. [9] Pavanato A, Tunon MJ, Sanchez−Campos S, Marroni CA, Llesuy S, Gonzalez− Gallego J, Marroni N: Ef− fects of quercetin on liver damage in rats with carbon tetrachloride−induced cirrhosis. Dig Dis Sci 2003, 48, 824–829. [10] Cipak L, Novotny L, Cipakova I, Rauko P: Differential modulation of cisplatin and doxorubicin efficacies in leukemia cells by flavonoids. Nutr Res 2003, 23, 1045–1057. [11] Le Marchand L, Murphy SP, Hankin JH, Wilkens LR, Kolonel LN: Intake of flavonoids and lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000, 92, 154–160. [12] Czeczot H: Biological activities of flavonoids – a review. Pol J Food Nutr Sci 2000, 9, 3–13. [13] Formica JV, Regelson W: Review of the biology of quercetin and related bioflavonoids. Fd Chem Toxic 1995, 33, 1061–1080. [14] Peterson J, Dwyer J: Flavonoids: dietary occurrence and bichemical activity. Nutr Res 1998, 18, 1995–2018. [15] Di Carlo J, Mascolo N, Izzo AA, Capasso F: Flavonoids: old and new aspects of a class of natural therapeutic drugs. Life Sci 1999, 65, 337–353. [16] Murota K, Terao J: Antioxidative flavonoid quercetin: implication of its intestinal absorption and metabolism. Arch Biochem Biophys 2003, 417, 12–17. [17] Prouillet C, Maziere JC, Maziere C, Wattel A, Brazier M, Kamel S: Stimulatory effect of naturally occurring flavonols quercetin and kaempferol on alkaline phosphatase activity in MG−63 human osteoblasts through ERK and estrogen receptor pathway. Biochem Pharmacol 2004, 67, 1307–1313. [18] Harborne JB, Williams CA: Advances in flavonoid research since 1992. Phytochemistry 1992, 55, 481–504. [19] Fusi F, Saponara S, Pessina F, Gorelli B, Sgaragli G: Effects of quercetin and rutin on vascular preparations. Eur J Nutr 2003, 42, 10–17. [20] Lahouel M, Boulkour S, Segueni N, Fillastre JP: Protective effect of flavonoides against the toxicity of vinbla− stine, cyclophosphamide and paracetamol by inhibition of lipid peroxydation and increase of liver glutathion. Ha− ematology 2004, 7, 59–67. 26 B. REGULSKA−ILOW, R. ILOW [21] Parrish ChC, Myher JJ, Kuksis A, Angel A: Lipid structure of rat adipocyte plasma membranes following die− tary lard and fish oil. Biochim Biophys Acta 1997, 1323, 253–262. [22] Barzanti V, Pregnolato P, Maranesi M, Bosi I, Baracca A, Solaini G, Turchetto E: Effect of dietary oils con− taining graded amounts of 18:3 n−6 and 18:4 n−3 on cell plasma membranes. J Nutr Biochem 1995, 6, 21–26. [23] Yilmaz N, Demirbas A, Sahin A: Changes in membrane fatty acid composition of human erythrocytes obtained from dietary margarine users and non−users. Food Chemistry 2000, 70, 371−375. [24] Reeves PG, Nielsen FH, Fahey GC: Ain−93 purified diets for laboratory rodents: final report of the American In− stitute of Nutrition ad hoc writing Committee on the Reformulation of the Ain−76A rodent diet. J Nutr 1993, 123, 1939–1951. [25] Ziemlański S, Panczenko−Kresowska B, Budzyńska−Topolewska J, Żelazkiewicz K, Kołakowska A: Effect of variously oxidized marine fish fat on guinea pig organism. Acta Aliment Pol 1992, 17/31, 159–169. [26] Folch J, Lees M, Sloane−Stanley GH: A simple method for the isolation, and purification of total lipids from ani− mal tissues. J Biol Chem 1957, 226, 497–509. [27] Andrikopoulos NK. Antonopoulou S, Kaliora AC: Oleuropein inhibits LDL oxidation induced by cooking oil frying by−products and platelet aggregation induced by platelet−activating factor. Lebensm−Wiss u−Technol 2002, 35, 479–484. [28] Daniewski M, Pawlicka M, Filipek A, Jacórzyński B, Mielniczuk E, Balas J, Domina P: Assessment of qua− lity control tests for frying fat of french fries. Pol J Hum Nutr Metab 2001, 28,132–139. [29] Luostarinen RL, Laasonen K, Calder PC: α−tocopherol concentrations, lipid peroxidation and superoxide di− smutase and glutathione peroxidase activities in rat heart and liver after feeding stabilized and unstabilized fish oil. Nutr Res 2001, 21, 1529–1544. [30] Pamplona R, Portero−Otin M, Riba D, Ruiz C, Prat J, Bellmunt MJ, Barja G: Mitochondrial membrane pe− roxidizability index is inversely related to maximum life span in mammals. J Lipid Res 1998, 39, 1989–1994. [31] Hwang D: Fatty acids and immune responses – a new perspective in searching for clues to mechanism. Annu Rev Nutr 2000, 20, 431–456. [32] Chu FLE, Lund ED, Harvey E, Adlof R: Arachidonic acid synthetic pathways of the oyster protozoan parasite, Perkinsus marinus: evidence for usage of a delta−8 pathway. Mol Biochem Parasitol 2004, 133, 45–51. [33] Fremont L, Gozzelino MT, Franchi MP, Linard A: Dietary flavonoids reduce lipid peroxidation in rats fed po− lyunsaturated or monounsaturated fat diets. J Nutr 1998, 128, 1495–1502. [34] Gaiva MHG, Couto RC, Oyama LM, Couto GEC, Silveira VLF, Riberio EB, Nascimento CMO: Polyunsa− turated fatty acid−rich diets: effect on adipose tissue metabolism in rats. Br J Nutr 2001, 86, 371–377. [35] Yaqoob P, Sherrington EJ, Jeffery NM, Sanderson P, Harvey DJ, Newsholme EA, Calder PC: Comparison of the effects of a range of dietary lipids upon serum and tissue lipid composition in the rat, Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol 1995, 27, 297–310. [36] Lopez−Varela S, Sanchez−Muniz FJ, Cuesta C: Decreased food efficiency ratio, growth retardation and changes in liver fatty acid composition in rats consuming thermally oxidized and polymerized sunflower oil used for fry− ing. Fd Chem Toxic 1995, 33, 181–189. [37] Ammouche A, Rouaki F, Bitam A, Bellal MM: Effect of ingestion of thermally oxidized sunflower oil on the fatty acid composition and antioxidant enzymes of rat liver and brain in development. Ann Nutr Metab 2002, 46, 268–275. Address for correspondence: Bożena Regulska−Ilow Department of Food Science and Nutrition Silesian Piasts University of Medicine Nankiera 1 50−140 Wrocław Poland Tel.: +48 71 78 40 209 E−mail: [email protected] Conflict of interest: None declared Received: 16.01.2008 Revised: 25.01.2008 Accepted: 7.02.2008