Panel efektów ksztaŕcenia
Transkrypt
Panel efektów ksztaŕcenia
Panel efektów kształcenia 2015-02-25 Strona: 1 Some basic information about the module The name of the faculty organization unit: The faculty Civil, Environmental Engineering and Architecture The name of the discipline: The area of study: technical sciences The profile of studing: general academic The level of study: second degree study Type of study: full time discipline specialities : The degree after graduating from university: The name of the module department : Department of Building Conservation The name of the module: The code of the module: 6579 The module status: mandatory for teaching programme The position in the studies teaching programme: sem: 2 / W15 P45 / 6 ECTS The language of the lecture: Polish The name of the coordinator 1: Marek Gosztyła, DSc, PhD, Eng. The contact details of the coordinator 1: the building , room , phone , [email protected] The name of the coordinator 2: Bartłomiej Tomkowicz, MSc, PE The contact details of the coordinator 2: the building , room , phone , [email protected] The name of the coordinator 3: Tomasz Huk, MSc, Eng., PE The contact details of the coordinator 3: the building V, room , phone , [email protected] The name of the coordinator 4: Anna Małachowicz, MSc, Eng., PE The contact details of the coordinator 4: the building V, room 124, phone 2106, [email protected] office hours of the coordinator: wednesday 16.30-18.30 Other teachers in this module semester 2: Tomasz Tomaszek, PhD, office hours Strona: 2 The aim of studing and bibliography The main aim of studing: Familiarisation with story and evolution of relic preservation, building skills to correct interpretation of conservatory processes and objects and spatial foundations placed in preservation zone. The general information about the module: Familiarisation with chosen aspects from subject. Explanation of basic terminology. Charakteristic of preservation evolution from antiquity to present. Knowing metodology of preservation work. Familiarisation with preservation story in Poland. Bibliography required to complete the module Bibliography used during lectures 1. W. Borusiewicz Konserwacja zabytków budownictwa murowanego 2. M. Brykowska Metody pomiarów i badań zabytków architektury. Warszawa ., 1985 Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej, Warszawa., 2003 Restauracja i konserwacja zabytków architektury w Polsce w Wyd. PWN, Warszawa., 1975 latach 1795 – 1918. Wyd. 2 zm, Ośrodek Ochrony i Konserwacji Zabytków, 4. W. Jaskulski, S. Kocewiak, P. Ogrodzki, Vademecum ochrony obiektów sakralnych. J. Rulewicz Warszawa., 1996 Ochrona zabytków architektury. T.1, Rozwój doktryn i teorii: 5. A. Kadłuczka Politechnika Krakowska, Kraków ., 2000 (vademecum). 3. J. Frycz Bibliography used during classes/laboratories/others 1. L. Majdecki 2. E. Małachowicz 3. E. Małachowicz 4. B. M. Pawlicki Ochrona i konserwacja zabytkowych założeń ogrodowych. Ochrona środowiska kulturowego, T. 1-2. Konserwacja i rewaloryzacja architektury w zespołach i krajobrazie. Strategia konserwacji zabytków architektury w Polsce. Warszawa ., 1993 wyd. 2, Warszawa ., 1988 Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej, Wrocław., 1994 Politechnika Krakowska, Kraków., 1993 Bibliography to self-study 1. J. Pruszyński Dziedzictwo kultury Polski. Jego straty i ochrona prawna, T. 1-2. 2. M. Przyłęcki, pod red. J. Ważnego i J. Ochrona i rewaloryzacja obiektów zabytkowych [w:] Ochrona budynków przed korozją Karysia biologiczną. 3. B. Rymaszewski Klucze ochrony zabytków w Polsce. Prawne problemy procesu inwestycyjno-budowlanego i konserwatorskiego - Stan prawny 4. I. Skrzydło-Niżnik, P. Dobosz na 1 stycznia 200 wyd. Zakamycze, Kraków., 2001 wyd. Arkady, Warszawa., 2001 Warszawa., 1992 wyd. Zakamycze, Kraków., 2002 Extra bibliography 1. J. Pruszyński Ochrona zabytków w Polsce. Geneza, organizacja, prawo. 2. red. E. Okoń Zabytkowe budowle drewniane i stolarka architektoniczna wobec współczesnych zagrożeń. 3. Zarys problematyki ochrony zabytków. Skrypt dla uczestników kursów Towarzystwa Opieki nad Zabytkami. http://nwpei.prz.rzeszow.pl/ek/ek.pl Warszawa., 1989 Wydaw. Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika, Toruń ., 2005 Warszawa ., 1996 1/3 Panel efektów kształcenia 2015-02-25 J. 4. Zachwatowicz Ochrona zabytków w Polsce. Wydaw. Polonia, Warszawa., 1965 Teaching materials: prezentacje multimedialne others: wzorcowe dokumentacje Strona: 3 Basic requirements in category knowledge/skills/social competences Formal requirements: Termination course in range history of architecture, history of polish architecture, architecture and urbanistic, conservation and preservation of relics Basic requirements in category knowledge: Has basic knowledge from metody of preservation work and conservatory designing. Basic requirements in category skills: Projecting investigative strategy and conservatory programs. Basic requirements in category social competences: Maintains precaution interpreting the results of investigation, is working in investigative team. Strona: 4 Module outcomes MEK The student who completed the module Types of classes / teaching methods leading to achieving a given outcome of teaching 01. Know and understand processes and procedure lecture, individual project for conservatory work. Know and understad the methody and manner of 02. preservation used in Poland and in foreign lecture, individual project countries Know to form diagnosis and opinions about 03. lecture, individual project existing state of storical relics 04. Has skill to prepare conservatury directions Has consciousness of architect role in 05. preservation 06. Present readiness to take liability to design solutions respect the storical relics lecture, individual project The ways of veryfing every Związki z Związki z mentioned outcome of KEK OEK teaching project presentation, written T2A_W03++ K_W009++ examination T2A_W04++ written examination, project presentation written examination, project presentation written examination, project presentation lecture, individual project written examination, project presentation lecture, individual project written examination, project presentation T2A_W03++ K_W010++ T2A_W04++ K_U009++ T2A_U10+ T2A_U15++ K_U010++ T2A_U10++ T2A_K01++ T2A_K02++ K_K005++ K_K011+++ T2A_K03+++ T2A_K05+++ T2A_K06+++ T2A_K01+++ T2A_K02++ T2A_K03++ K_K011+++ T2A_K04++ K_K014+++ T2A_K05++ T2A_K06++ T2A_K07+++ Strona: 5 The syllabus of the module realized MEK in TK01 Familiarisation with basic terms and range of heritage preservation W1, P1 MEK01 MEK03 Aspects of preservation and revalorisation of urba and architectonical foundations and landscape protection. Function and meaning MEK02 TK02 of storical relic in society perception. Primary and cultural landscape. Outline of evolution of term preservation. W2, P2 MEK05 W3, P3- MEK01 TK03 Adaptation of existing structure and integration with modern form. P6 MEK03 Revitalisation of disabled foundations. Metody of preservation work in storical foundations. Discusion on processes in design work W4, P7- MEK01 TK04 and their realisation on individual part. P9 MEK06 Conservatory problems in urban and architectonical foundations (on example of town, rural and architectonical - landscape W5, MEK04 TK05 foundations) P10-P11 MEK05 W6, MEK02 TK06 Conservatory problems in palace - park foundations P12-P13 MEK04 MEK01 Questions of integration modern forms with storical and traditional forms in enclosing. Conservatory realization: executive TK07 W7, P14 MEK03 qualifications, research and preservation work documentation. MEK05 Sem. TK 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 The content Strona: 6 The student's effort The type of classes The work before classes The paticipation in classes The work after classesZDYPT complementing/reading through notes: 5.00 hours/sem. Lecture (sem. 2) The preparation for a test: 10.00 hours/sem. Project/Seminar (sem. 2) The preparation for projects/seminars: 35.00 hours/sem. contact hours: 15.00 hours/sem. Studying the recommended bibliography: 5.00 hours/sem. contact hours: 45.00 hours/sem.. Doing the project/report/ Keeping records: 35.00 hours/sem. The preparation for the presentation: 5.00 hours/sem. Advice (sem. 2) The preparation for Advice: 5.00 hours/sem. Exam (sem. 2) The preparation for an Exam: 15.00 hours/sem. The participation in Advice: 2.00 hours/sem. The written exam: 2.00 hours/sem. http://nwpei.prz.rzeszow.pl/ek/ek.pl The oral exam: 1.00 hours/sem. 2/3 Panel efektów kształcenia 2015-02-25 Strona: 7 The requirements for receiving a credit for a class The student who completed the module with the grade 3 with the grade 4 not only reached the level of knowledge and skills required for the grade 3, but also capture knowledge in range 80%. Know and understad the methody and manner not only reached the level of knowledge and skills of preservation used in Poland and in foreign required for the grade 3, but also capture knowledge in countries range 80%. not only reached the level of knowledge and skills Know to form diagnosis and opinions about required for the grade 3, but also capture knowledge in existing state of storical relics range 80%. not only reached the level of knowledge and skills Has skill to prepare conservatury directions required for the grade 3, but also capture knowledge in range 80%. Has consciousness of architect role in has specific social competences preservation Present readiness to take liability to design has specific social competences solutions respect the storical relics Know and understand processes and procedure for conservatory work. with the grade 5 not only reached the level of knowledge and skills required for the grade 4, but also capture knowledge in range 90 100%. not only reached the level of knowledge and skills required for the grade 4, but also capture knowledge in range 90 100%. not only reached the level of knowledge and skills required for the grade 4, but also capture knowledge in range 90 100%. not only reached the level of knowledge and skills required for the grade 4, but also capture knowledge in range 90 100%. has specific social competences has specific social competences The student who reached the intended level of knowledge, learned the required skills, who has specific social competences , wich are defined in module outcomes, completes the module The student who didn't achieve the module outcomes, doesn't complete the module The way of giving the component module grades and the final grade The type of classes Lecture Project/Seminar The final grade The way of giving the final grade Written examination DEstimate of presented project, final presentation and activity in the course Average of the evaluation from the examination (0.5 final evaluation) and of project (0.5 final evaluation). Strona: 8 Sample problems Required during the exam/when receiving the credit Realized during classes/laboratories/pojects Others Can a student use any teaching aids during the exam/when receiving the credit: no drukuj http://nwpei.prz.rzeszow.pl/ek/ek.pl 3/3