Pobierz PDF
Transkrypt
Pobierz PDF
12-zales.qxd 7/10/09 12:41 PM Page 291 ORIGINAL PAPERS Adv Clin Exp Med 2009, 18, 3, 291–295 ISSN 1230−025X © Copyright by Wroclaw Medical University MARIA ZALESSKA−KRĘCICKA1, ZYGMUNT ZDROJEWICZ2, ALEKSANDRA SKRZYPEK1, MONIKA MORAWSKA−KOCHMAN1, MARTA MATUSIAK−KITA3, MARCIN JUST4, KATARZYNA OSTASIEWICZ4, KAROLINA BYNDAS5, TOMASZ KRĘCICKI1 The Influence of Hormonal Oral Contraception on Voice Parameters in Young Women – a Pilot Study Wpływ doustnej antykoncepcji hormonalnej na parametry głosu młodych kobiet – doniesienie wstępne 1 ENT Head and Neck Surgery Department, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland Endocrinology, Diabetology, and Isotopic Treatment Department, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland 3 1st Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland 4 Wrocław University of Technology, Poland 5 Protective and Special Needs Pedagogic Faculty, Opole University, Poland 2 Abstract Objectives. Evaluation of the influence of modern hormonal contraceptive preparations on voice and acoustic voice analysis parameters in young women. Material and Methods. Twenty−nine women were examined (mean age: 25, range: 21–37 years). All patients used hormonal contraceptive pills available on the Polish market. ENT examination and endoscopic evaluation of the larynx were performed. Videostroboscopy of the larynx was performed in each patient, then voice samples were recorded using a dynamic microphone with a preamplifier connected to the sound card of a PC in a room with a noise level no higher than 30 dB. Each sample was acoustically analyzed using Iris software for MDVP. Conclusions. There were no statistically significant changes in the Jitter and Shimmer parameters in the women who used oral hormonal contraception. Statistically significant changes in higher formant frequencies of the vowel “a” were observed. The use of hormonal contraception influenced subjective voice evaluation in the investigated women only to a small degree. The use of hormonal contraception could result in the retention of thick mucus in the larynx (Adv Clin Exp Med 2009, 18, 3, 291–295). Key words: oral hormonal contraception, voice analysis parameters, voice, contraceptive pills, contraception. Streszczenie Cel pracy. Ocena wpływu nowoczesnych hormonalnych doustnych preparatów antykoncepcyjnych na głos i para− metry analizy akustycznej młodych kobiet stosujących takie preparaty. Materiał i metody. Zbadano 29 kobiet (średnia wieku 25 lat, zakres 21–37). Wszystkie pacjentki stosowały preparaty antykoncepcyjne dostępne na polskim rynku. U każdej badanej wykonano badanie laryngologiczne i endoskopowe krtani. Na pierwszym etapie wykonano badania wideostroboskopowe krtani, a następnie z użyciem mikrofonu dynamicznego połączonego z kartą dźwiękową komputera PC nagrywano próbkę głosu. Poziom hałasu w pomieszczeniu, w którym dokonywano nagrań, nie przekraczał 30 dB. Każdą próbkę głosu poddawano analizie akustycznej za pomocą programu Iris do MDVP. Wnioski. Nie stwierdzono istotnych statystycznie różnic w parametrach Jitter Shimmer u kobiet stosujących doustną antykoncepcję hormonalną. Zaobserwowano istotne statystycznie zmiany częstotliwości wyższych for− mantów głoski „a”. Stosowanie doustnej antykoncepcji hormonalnej tylko w niewielkim stopniu wpływa na subiektywną ocenę głosu u badanych kobiet. Stosowanie doustnej antykoncepcji hormonalnej może wiązać się z zaleganiem gęstej treści śluzowej w krtani (Adv Clin Exp Med 2009, 18, 3, 291–295). Słowa kluczowe: doustna antykoncepcja hormonalna, parametry analizy głosu, głos, tabletki antykoncepcyjne, antykoncepcja. * The study was financed by grant no. 1471 of Wroclaw Medical University. 12-zales.qxd 7/10/09 12:41 PM Page 292 292 M. ZALESSKA−KRĘCICKA et al. There is a close relationship between voice emission and endocrine gland function. Birds and mammals in estrus use voice to express their affec− tive condition and entice the other sex. The influ− ence of sex hormones on the voice organ in humans has significant impact, also on thus the biological mechanism of species preservation. The voice organ, especially in women, is subject to the influence of hormones throughout life. Dysphonia premenstrualis, or premenstrual vocal syndrome (PVS), caused by a reduction of blood estrogen level in the post−ovulatory phase of the menstrual cycle [1–3], constitutes an example. So−called androphonia, a disorder of voice in women, is often caused by exogenous factors such as the application of sex hormone−containing medica− tions [4, 5]. Estrogen and androgen−estrogen preparations have particular importance in the treatment of menstrual disorders and as a method of contraception. In some cases, anti−androgen− active substances are also used. During the post− menopausal period, some changes in the voice organ take place which are related to the depletion of ovarian function. Masculinization of the larynx occurs and the voice lowers and becomes easily exhausted and weaker [4]. The aim of the study was an evaluation of the influence of modern contraceptive preparations on voice and acoustic voice analysis parameters in young women using oral hormonal contraception. The results of this study could be especially important for individuals working professionally with voice, as early studies investigating the influ− ence of hormonal contraception on voice (large doses of hormones) discouraged women from this method of family planning. Material and Methods Twenty−nine women were examined (mean age: 25, range: 21–37 years). All the patients used hormonal contraceptive pills available on the Polish market (Cilest: 0.035 mg ethynylestradiol + 0.25 mg norgestymat, Logest: 0.2 mg ethyny− lestradiol + 0.075 gestagen, Diane: 35–0.035 mg ethynylestradiol + 0.002 mg cyproterone acetate). The average period of pill use was 37 months. ENT examination and endoscopic evaluation of the larynx were performed. During the first stage of the study, videostroboscopy of the larynx was performed in each patient, then voice samples were recorded (a phonetically balanced sentence in Polish and the vowel “a”) using a dynamic microphone with a preamplifier connected to the sound card of a PC in a room with a noise level no higher than 30 dB. Each sample acoustically ana− lyzed using Iris software for the Multi− Dimensional Voice Program (MDVP). The sam− ples of the vowel “a” and the phrase: „Dzisiaj jest ładna pogoda” [’daj ‘jest ‘wadna po’goda] (“It is a beautiful day”) were analyzed separately. Basic parametric analysis, formant analysis, voice field, harmonic analysis, and spectrographic analysis were performed. Each patient filled out a questionnaire regarding general health and endocrinal and ENT disorders. A control group was examined analogously. This group consisted of healthy female students of Wrocław universities with the proper mean and range of age who did not use hormonal contraceptives. The results of acoustic voice analysis were statistically analyzed using Statistica 7.1 software. Mann−Whitney U tests were conducted. During this study there were no voice acoustic parameter norms in the lit− erature for Iris multiparameter acoustic analysis beside basic frequency of voice. Norms were not defined. Such analysis is considered a proper tool for population investigation and comparing groups in it or to monitor changes in voice over time in the same patient, for example during therapy. It was therefore used to examine women using hormonal contraception and compare the results with those not using it. Results The results of the questionnaire concerning voice disorders showed that 5 women reported hoarseness since using hormonal contraceptive pills and 1 reported voice fatigue. The presence of dense mucus was observed by videostroboscopy in 90% of the examined women and vocal nodules in 3 women. It is probable that these vocal nodules were the result of improper voice emission habits and loss of professional voice training. Changes in almost all the investigated parame− ters were found during acoustic voice analysis of the vowel “a” (Table 1). Only the parameters F0 (basic frequency), F0_Dev (standard deviation of the basic frequency), and A_Dev (standard devia− tion of the amplitude) were examined during acoustic analysis of the sentence (Table 2). Statistically significant (p < 0.05) or nearly signif− icant changes appeared in acoustic analysis of the vowel “a” for the parameters F3_Dev (standard deviation of the third formant frequency; Mann− −Whitney U, p = 0.0627) and F4_Dev (standard deviation of the fourth formant frequency; p = = 0.0489) (Table 3). A nearly statistically signifi− cant change appeared in acoustic analysis of the sentence for F0_Dev (standard deviation of basic frequency; p = 0.066629) (Table 4). 12-zales.qxd 7/10/09 12:41 PM Page 293 293 Oral Contraception and Voice in Young Women Table. 1. Acoustic voice analysis of the vowel “a”. Changes of parameters compared with the control group. NHR – noise−to−harmonic ratio, U2H – unharmonic−to− harmonic ratio, YG – continuous Yanagihara factor Table 3. Statistically significant results of the acoustic analysis of the vowel “a” Tabela 3. Istotne statystycznie wyniki analizy statysty− cznej samogłoski “a” Table 1. Analiza akustyczna głosu samogłoski „a”. Voice analysis parameter (Wskaźnik analizy głosu) Percent change (Zmiana %) F0 –6 F0_Dev 57 Jitter Mann−Whitney U test close to p < 0.05 F3_Dev 0.0627 F4_Dev 0.0489 12 Jitter_Dev 25.5 Shimmer 1.5 Shimmer_Dev Parameter (Wskaźnik) –1.5 U2H 18 NHR 25.5 YG 4.5 F1 –10.5 F2 –7.5 F3 0 F4 –1.5 F1_Dev 9 F2_Dev –16.5 F3_Dev −57 F4_Dev –46.5 Table 2. Acoustic analysis of selected parameters of the sentence: „Dzisiaj jest ładna pogoda”. Changes compared with controls Tabela 2. Analiza akustyczna wybranych wskaźników zdania “Dzisiaj jest ładna pogoda”. Zmiany w porówna− niu z grupą kontrolną Parameter (Wskaźnik) Percent change (Zmiana %) F0 −3 F0_Dev −16 A_Dev −1 Discussion There is a long history of research concerning the relationship between the human larynx and sex hormones in women [1, 6, 15, 16]. The female organism is influenced by two main sex hormones: estrogen and progesterone. Both influence mainly the reproductive system [7, 8]. However, their influence on other tissues and organs, including the larynx, has been proven [2, 9]. Similarities in cytological samples of vocal fold epithelium and cervix epithelium have been found [6]. Estrogen causes hypertrophy of the laryngeal mucosa and increases glandular cell secretion in the region of Table 4. Statistically significant parameter changes in acoustic analysis of the sentence: „Dzisiaj jest ładna pogoda” Tabela 4. Istotne statystycznie zmiany wskaźnika w analizie akustycznej zdania „Dzisiaj jest ładna pogoda” Parameter (Wskaźnik) Mann−Whitney U test close to p < 0.05 F0_Dev 0.066629 the vocal folds, which has been shown in histopathological examinations. The balance between the two hormones changes during the course of the menstrual cycle. Progesterone leads to congestion of the vocal fold tissue and edema− tous changes of the vocal folds, which is typical of the perimenstrual period [3]. It also reduces the amount of glandular secretion, which results in a greater stringiness and acidity of the mucus and the sensation of tissue dryness [7]. These reports have been confirmed by the presence of androgen and estrogen receptors in the human larynx epithe− lium found in both intraoperative and cadaver samples [10]. Progesterone receptors were detect− ed in cellular nuclei and cytoplasm of laryngeal epithelial cells. The results of Schneider et al., however, contradict this; according to them there are no characteristics of the expression of sex steroid receptors in the vocal folds [11]. Female voice changes frequently observed in clinical practice are related to the life cycle of the organism, which is subject to the influences of sex hormones. Dynamic changes in sex hormone levels determine the basic voice frequency oscillations during puberty, maturity, and menopause [12]. Significantly higher values of jitter and shimmer have been found prior to menstruation in studies of premenstrual syndrome. This especially concerns women who use their voice professionally, whose voice changes are not related to emotional excita− tion or have no psychogenic basis [1, 3, 4, 8]. The morphological changes taking place in the vocal folds during the premenopausal phase of life lead to a reduction of connective tissue and mucosa flexibility and increased vocal fold mass and thus 12-zales.qxd 7/10/09 12:41 PM Page 294 294 M. ZALESSKA−KRĘCICKA et al. to a lowering of voice pitch and control. Hormonal replacement therapy in menopausal women also affects the voice, moderating changes related to menopausal hormonal disorders [8, 9, 12, 13]. It is assumed that changes in sex hormone levels could affect the neuromotor control of the larynx [13]. Hormonal contraception results in maintaining specific and constant estrogen and progesterone levels, thus suppressing ovulation. Therefore it seems that voice changes will be smaller in women using oral hormonal contraception than in those who do not. This has been confirmed by Amir et al. [2, 3]. In the study group using low−dose hormonal contraception, a small increase of jitter and shim− mer were observed compared with the control group. Moreover, a higher variability in all the parameters of acoustic analysis was noted in the control group. Increased jitter and shimmer are regarded as an indicator of a less stable process of basic tone [6, 7]. On the other hand, Wendler et al. found no changes in voice quality [5]. Minor increases of jitter and shimmer as well as greater changes in the standard deviations of these para− meters during phonation were observed in the pre− sent study. However, these were not statistically significant compared with the control group, which can be explained by the large dispersion in the control group and its relatively small statistical strength. The parameters describing the larger noise component of the voice in women using hor− monal contraception increased similarly. However, this also appeared to be statistically insignificant. Although there are no data in the lit− erature concerning changes in formant frequencies during sex hormone application, a decrease in the higher formant frequencies of the vowel “a” appeared to be significant in the present study. According to the present authors’ clinical observa− tions, hormonal voice disorders often begin from difficulties in quiet phonation. The changes noted in the voice analysis, especially of the sentence and the standard deviations of the formant analysis of the vowel “a”, indicate intonation weakening and, although these values were statistically insignificant, the voice and formant frequency become lower. These changes show that the vocal folds work more irregularly, but the voice tract configuration is more stable in women who use hormonal contraception. In conclusion, there were no statistically sig− nificant changes in the parameters Jitter and Shimmer in the group of women who used oral hormonal contraception. Statistically significant changes in higher formant frequencies of the vowel “a” were observed. The use of hormonal contraception influenced subjective voice evalua− tion in the investigated women only to a small degree. The use of hormonal contraception could result in the retention of thick mucus in the larynx. References [1] Abitbol J, Abitbol P, Abitbol B: Sex hormones and the female voice. J Voice 1999, 13, 424–46. [2] Davis CB, Davis ML: The effects of premenstrual syndrome (PMS) on the female singer. J Voice 1993, 7, 337–353. [3] Chae SW, Choi G, Kang HJ, Choi JO, Jin SM: Clinical Analysis of Voice Change as a Parameter of Premenstrual Syndrome. J Voice 2001, 15, 2, 278–283. [4] Baker J: A report on alteration to the speaking and singing voice of four women following hormonal therapy with virilizing agents. J Voice 1999, 13, 4, 496–507. [5] Wendler J, Siegert C, Schelhorn P, Klinger G, Gurr S, Kaufmann J, Aydinlink, Braunschweig T: The influ− ence of Microgynon and Diane−35, two sub−fifty ovulation inhibitors, on voice function in women. Contraception 1995, 52, 343–348. [6] Amir O, Biron−Shenta T, Muchnik C, Kishon−Rabin L: Do Oral Contraceptives Improve Vocal Quality? Limited Trial on Low−Dose Formulations. Obstet Gynecol 2003, 101, 4, 773–777. [7] Amir O, Kiszhon−Rabin L, Muchnik C: The Effect of Oral Contraceptives on Voice: Preliminary Observations. J Voice 2002, 16, 267–273. [8] Boulet MJ, Oddens BJ: Female voice changes around and after the menopause – an initial investigation. Maturitas 1996, 23, 15–21. [9] Lindholm P, Vilkman E, Raudaskoski T, Suvonta−Luukkononen E, Kauppila A: The effect of postmenopause and postmenopausal HRT on measured voice values and vocal symptoms. Maturitas 1997, 28, 47–53. [10] Newman SR, Butler J, Hammond EH, Gray SD: Preliminary Report on Hormone Receptors in the Human Vocal Fold. J Voice 2000, 14, 1, 72–78. [11] Schneider B, Eleonore C, Stani J et al.: Towards the Expression of Sex Hormone Receptors in the Human Vocal Fold. J Voice 2007, 21, 4, 502–507. [12] Mendes−Laureano J, Sa MFS, Ferriania RA et al.: Comparison of Fundamental voice frequency between menopausal women and women at menacme. Maturitas 2006, 55, 195–199. [13] Wadnerkar MB, Cowell PE, Whiteside SP.: Speech across the menstrual cycle: a replication and extension study. Neurosc Lett 2006, 408, 21–24. 12-zales.qxd 7/10/09 12:41 PM Page 295 Oral Contraception and Voice in Young Women 295 [14] Obrębowski A.: Podstawy anatomii i fizjologii narządu głosu. W: Narząd głosu i jego znaczenie w komunikacji społecznej. Red.: Obrębowski A. Wydaw. Nauk. Uniw. Med. im. K. Marcinkowskiego, Poznań 2008, 9–41. [15] Obrębowski A.: Badania kliniczne i elektroakustyczne nad egzogenną wirylizacją narządu głosu. Rozpr. hab. AM, Poznań 1982. [16] Obrębowski A.: Podstawy anatomii i fizjologii narządu głosu. W: Narząd głosu i jego znaczenie w komunikacji społecznej. Red.: Obrębowski A. Wydaw. Nauk. Uniw. Med. im. K. Marcinkowskiego. Poznań 2008, 9–41. Address for correspondence: Zygmunt Zdrojewicz Endocrinology, Diabetology, and Isotopic Treatment Department Wroclaw Medical University Pasteura 4 50−367 Wrocław Poland Tel.: +48 71 784 25 54 E−mail: [email protected] Conflict of interest: None declared Received: 13.03.2009 Revised: 29.09.2009 Accepted: 19.06.2009 12-zales.qxd 7/10/09 12:41 PM Page 296