The impact of selected nutritional factors on cis-9, trans
Transkrypt
The impact of selected nutritional factors on cis-9, trans
840 Probl Hig Epidemiol 2011, 92(4): 840-843 The impact of selected nutritional factors on cis-9, trans-11 octadecadienoate content in milk of breastfeeding women. Part I. Wpływ wybranych czynników żywieniowych na zawartość kwasu cis-9, trans-11 oktadekadienowego w mleku kobiet karmiących. Część I. Agnieszka Białek, Andrzej Tokarz, Mateusz Romanowicz Katedra i Zakład Bromatologii, Warszawski Uniwersytet Medyczny Wprowadzenie. Mleko matki stanowi najlepszy pokarm dla niemowląt i małych dzieci. Kwas cis-9, trans-11 oktadekadienowy (kwas żwaczowy) jest głównym izomerem spośród sprzężonych dienów kwasu linolowego, obecnych w mleku różnych gatunków. Ma on duże znaczenie dla zdrowia niemowląt jako czynnik wzrostu, przyczyniając się m.in. do efektywniejszego wykorzystania pokarmu. Liczne czynniki decydują o jego ilości w tłuszczu mleka. Cel pracy. Oznaczenie zawartości tłuszczu i kwasu żwaczowego w mleku kobiecym oraz określenie wpływu różnorodnych czynników żywieniowych na te parametry. Materiał i metody. Przebadano 67 próbek mleka kobiet karmiących, których dietę poddano analizie pod kątem ich zwyczajów żywieniowych. Natomiast analizę kwasów tłuszczowych wykonano techniką GC z zastosowaniem kolumny kapilarnej i detekcją płomieniowo-jonizacyjną. Wzorzec CLA FAME reference standard (Nu-Chek-Prep) posłużył do identyfikacji kwasu żwaczowego. Ocenę statystyczną wyników wykonano przy użyciu programu Statistica 8.0. Wyniki. Średnie zawartości tłuszczu w mleku wynosiły 2,42±0,11%, zaś kwasu żwaczowego – 1,38±0,09 mg/g tł. Stwierdzono dodatnią korelację pomiędzy ilością tłuszczu i zawartością CLA w mleku oraz pomiędzy zawartością CLA w mleku i CLA w tłuszczu, oraz ujemną korelację pomiędzy zawartością tłuszczu a zawartością CLA w tłuszczu mleka. Ponadto inne czynniki, takie jak np. spożycie mleka i napojów mlecznych wpływały na zawartość tłuszczu lub zawartość kwasu żwaczowego. Wniosek. Uzyskane wyniki wskazują, że czynniki dietetyczne mogą oddziaływać na zawartość tłuszczu i kwasu żwaczowego w mleku kobiecym. Introduction. Maternal milk provides optimal nutrition to the breastfed infants. Cis-9, trans-11 octadecadienoate (rumenic acid), main isomer of conjugated linoleic acids in milk of different species can greatly influence infant health as a potential growth factor, mainly by improving feed efficiency. Numerous factors can affect its concentration in milk fat. Aim. To examine the content of fat and rumenic acid in human milk as well as to determine the influence of selected nutritional factors on that content. Material & methods. We investigated 67 milk samples of breastfeeding women. They were anonymously surveyed, i.a. about their nutritional habits. The fatty acid analysis was made with GC with capillary column and flame-ionization detection. CLA FAME reference standard (Nu-ChekPrep) was used to identify rumenic acid. The statistic evaluation was made with Statistica 8.0. Results. The mean fat content in milk was 2.42±0.11% and the mean rumenic acid content was established to be 1.38±0.09 mg/g of fat. We observed a positive correlation between the fat and CLA content in milk and between the CLA content in fat and in milk, as well as a negative correlation between the fat and CLA content in fat. Moreover other factors, such as milk and dairy beverage consumption, influence the fat or rumenic acid content. Conclusion. Our findings confirm that dietary factors can affect the fat and rumenic acid content in human milk. Key words: conjugated linoleic acid, CLA, maternal milk, breastfeeding, maternal nutrition Słowa kluczowe: sprzężone dieny kwasu linolowego, CLA, mleko kobiece, karmienie piersią, żywienie matki © Probl Hig Epidemiol 2011, 92(4): 840-843 www.phie.pl Nadesłano: 10.06.2011 Zakwalifikowano do druku: 02.08.2011 Introduction Maternal milk provides optimal nutrition for infants. Human milk is a complex mixture of all nutrients essential for normal growth and development Adres do korespondencji / Address for correspondence mgr Agnieszka Białek Katedra i Zakład Bromatologii ul. Banacha 1, 02-097 Warszawa tel./fax (+ 48 22) 5720785, e-mail: [email protected] of the infant. It contains about 3 to 5% of lipids [1] which represent the main source of energy. Most of them are TAG (>95%) and are located in globules coated with areolas of milk and cellular proteins, Białek A et al. The impact of selected nutritional factors on cis-9, trans-11 octadecadienoate content in milk ... Part I. phospholipids, sterols, enzymes and other bipolar substances. Many factors can affect the composition of human milk, e.g.: stage of lactation and maternal diet [1, 2]. Fatty acids of human milk fat originate from adipose tissue (60%), diet (30%) and de novo synthesis (10-12%) [3]. CLA (conjugated linoleic acid) refers to a group of positional and geometric isomers of linoleic acid with a pair of conjugated carbon-carbon double bonds. They have been identified primarily in ruminant milks, meats and dairy products. CLA have been reported to produce a variety of physiological effects, e.g.: antiatherogenic effect [4, 5], causing body fat loss, increasing lean body mass [6, 7] and anticancerogenic activity [8, 9]. The two major CLA isomers with known physiologic activities are cis-9, trans-11 octadecadienoate (rumenic acid, RA) and trans-10, cis-12 octadecadienoate. Rumenic acid has great meaning for infant health as a potential growth factor, mainly by enhancing weight and improving feed efficiency [10]. Maternal milk is the first choice for newborns and infants, therefore its quality is very important for infant health. The aim of our study was to determine the influence of different dietary factors on the content of fat and cis-9, trans-11 octadecadienoate in human milk. Material and methods This study involved 67 breastfeeding women, aged 20-42 years who gave birth to one child or two children, mainly in The Gynecological-Obstetric Department of Central Hospital of the Ministry of Interior and Administration. All mothers agreed to provide samples of breast milk. Both colostrum and mature milk samples were examined. Mothers were anonymously asked about their nutritional and dietary habits during and after pregnancy. Samples of breast milk (50-150 ml) were collected by manual expression from both breasts. They were immediately frozen and stored at –20ºC in sterile polypropylene containers. The milk samples were thawed only once and lipids extraction was prepared according to a modified procedure by Chin et al. [11] from 1.0 ml of breast milk using twice 5.0 ml of ethyl ether: petroleum ether (1:1, v/v) after adding 2.0 ml of ethanol and 0.1 ml of ammonium hydroxide (25%). Organic extracts were dried under nitrogen and the extracted milk fat was weighed. Fatty acid methyl esters were obtained by transesterification according to Christie et al. [12] and separated and quantified by gas chromatography using Shimadzu GC-17A chromatograph equipped with flameionization detector. The injector and detector were heated to 250ºC. The separation was performed on 841 BPX 70 capillary column (60 m × 0.25 mm i.d., film thickness: 0.20 μm, SGE) with helium as the carrier gas. The initial oven temperature was 170ºC for 3 min., thereafter increased by 5 ºC/min. to 200ºC and maintained for 50 min. and increased by 10ºC/min. to 220ºC and maintained for 20 min. The identities of cis-9, trans-11 octadecadienoic acid were established by comparing retention times to CLA FAME reference standard (Nu-Chek-Prep). Other fatty acids were not quantified in this study. The results were evaluated with Statistica 8 (StatSoft, Poland). The data were tested for normality with Shapiro-Wilk test. Because of the shortage of normal distribution the data were examined using proper non-parametric test, e.g.: Mann-Whitney U rank test and Kruskal-Wallis test. P – value ≤0.05 was considered significant. Results All examined human milk samples contained measurable amounts of rumenic acid ranging from 0.36 to 3.99 mg/g of fat (mean±SD; 1.38±0.09 mg/g of fat). On the milk weight basis, these values ranged from 0.92 to 9.53 mg/100 g of milk (3.17±0.20 mg/100 g of milk). On the milk volume basis, these values ranged from 0.84 to 9.71 mg/100 ml of milk (3.24±0.21 mg/100 ml of milk). The fat content in maternal milk ranged from 1.11 to 5.78% (2.42±0.11%) (Table I). There was a positive correlation between the fat and cis-9, trans-11 CLA content in milk (r=0.3589, p=0.0300) (Fig. 1A), between the rumenic acid content in fat and in milk (r=0.7173, p < 0.0010) and a negative correlation between the fat and rumenic acid content in fat (r=-0.03116, p=0.0100) (Fig. 1B). These data indicate that the rumenic acid concentration in human milk depends on both the fat content in breast milk and the fat quality. The fat content in milk and the CLA content in milk fat and in milk depending on the evaluated factors are listed in Table II. A high intake of milk and dairy beverages had a great impact on both the fat and cis-9, trans-11 CLA concentration in human milk and resulted in a significant decrease in the fat content (p=0.0016) and a significant increase in the rumenic acid content in fat (p=0.0043). Table I. Content of fat and cis-9, trans-11 octadecadienoate in human milk Tabela I. Zawartość tłuszczu i kwasu cis-9, trans-11 oktadekadienowego w mleku kobiecym Range /Zakres Mean±SD /średnia±SD % 1.11-2.78 2.42±0.11 mg/g of fat 0.36-3.99 1.38±0.09 cis-9, trans-11 CLA mg/100 ml of milk 0.84-9.71 3.24±0.21 cis-9, trans-11 CLA mg/100 g of milk 0.92-9.53 3.17±0.20 Variable /Zmienna Unit /Jednostka FAT / Tłuszcz cis-9, trans-11 CLA 842 Probl Hig Epidemiol 2011, 92(4): 840-843 Table II. Content of fat and cis-9, trans-11 CLA in human milk depending on various dietary factors Tabela II. Zawartość tłuszczu i kwasu cis-9, trans-11 oktadekadienowego w mleku kobiecym w zależności od różnych czynników dietetycznych FAT /Tłuszcz Factor /Czynnik Frequency /Częstotliwość Milk and dairy beverages Yes /tak /Mleko i napoje mleczne No /nie Cheese /Ser Seldom /rzadko Often /często Beef /Wołowina no/seldom /nie/rzadko Often /często Pork /Wieprzowina Seldom /rzadko 2 a week /2 x w tyg. 3 a week /3 x w tyg. 5 a week /5 x w tyg. Daily /dziennie Veal /Cielęcina Yes /Tak No /Nie Poultry /Drób Seldom /rzadko 2 a week /2 x w tyg. 3 a week /3 x w tyg. Daily /dziennie Fish /Ryby Yes /Tak No /Nie Cold meats /wędliny No /Nie Seldom /rzadko 2 a week /2 x w tyg. 3 a week /3 x w tyg. Daily /dziennie cis-9, trans-11 CLA % mean±SD /średnia±SD 2.21±0.81 2.89±0.98 2.48±1.13 2.41±0.87 2.60±0.98 2.27±1.00 2.62±0.71 2.59±1.18 2.66±0.94 1.98±0.00 2.21±0.77 2.30±0.83 2.57±0.97 2.52±1.00 2.57±1.18 2.55±0.75 2.28±0.82 2.49±1.14 2.39±0.82 3.10±0,00 1.53±0,00 2.41±0,46 2.14±0,72 2.54±1,00 mg/g of fat p 0.0016* 0.0180* 0.0926 0.1207 0.2588 0.7371 0.2763 0.2119 mean±SD /średnia±SD 1.51±0.72 1.10±0.63 1.21±0.57 1.42±0.74 1.52±0.78 1.30±0.73 1.46±0.82 1.29±0.59 1.33±0.58 1.06±0.00 1.35±0.90 1.39±0.73 1.43±0.79 1.22±0.58 1.63±0.86 1.39±0.79 1.15±0.47 1.14±0.51 1.48±0.78 0.83±0.00 1.38±0.00 1.04±0.21 1.45±0.68 1.40±0.77 mg/100 ml p 0.0043* 0.0498* 0.1581 0.8158 0.8260 0.3126 0.5966 0.7022 mean±SD /średnia±SD 3.23±1.55 3.28±2.05 2.97±1.65 3.31±1.73 3.87±2.09 2.66±1.07 3.95±2.43 3.23±1.74 3.33±1.05 2.12±0.00 2.79±1.60 3.26±1.99 3.52±1.79 2.96±1.28 3.96±1.87 3.47±2.22 2.62±1.21 2.74±1.49 3.40±1.75 2.66±0.00 2.14±0.00 2.92±1.04 2.93±1.27 3.43±1.92 mg/100 g p 0.7304 0.6781 0.0425* 0.4264 0.5622 0.1428 0.9760 0.8870 mean±SD /średnia±SD 3.15±1.47 3.21±2.00 2.91±1.56 3.24±1.67 3.82±2.01 2.57±1.02 3.88±2.39 3.15±1.66 3.30±1.03 2.06±0.00 2.75±1.54 3.15±1.91 3.45±1.73 2.89±1.26 3.85±1.72 3.44±2.15 2.56±1.18 2.70±1.42 3.33±1.71 2.56±0.00 2.19±0.00 2.76±1.07 2.84±1.15 3.38±1.85 p 0.6901 0.6781 0.0164* 0.4430 0.4596 0.1225 0.0273* 0.8630 p – probability level/significance level, mean – arithmetic mean, SD – standard deviation, * – significant differences between groups Frequent consumption of cheese also influenced both these variables causing significant differences between groups. The fat content was significantly lower and the rumenic acid content was significantly higher in milk of women who often consumed cheese compared to the group of mothers who seldom ate cheese. Our results are partly similar to those of Park et al. [13] who observed a higher concentration of rumenic acid in milk of women with a higher dietary rumenic acid intake. Also Rizenthaler et al. [14] showed that consumption of rumenic acid-enriched cheese slightly increased the milk rumenic acid concentration. Both these data do not confirm our results of the influence of dairy product consumption on the fat amount in milk. The results of Rizenthaler et al. show that a higher intake of dairy products rich in cis-9, trans-11 CLA does not influence the milk fat concentration [14]. Data of Park et al. indicate that consumption of dairy products causes an increase in the total milk fat content [13]. Moutsioulis et al., who investigated the short-term kinetics of maternal CLA consumption from food on CLA appearance in breast milk of lactating women, gave the volunteers CLA-enriched cookies made of CLA-enriched butter and observed a significant increase in the mean breast milk CLA concentration (0.16±0.08 vs 0.09±0.04 mg/ml) [15]. Although the mean content of rumenic acid in milk was noticeably greater than in our study, the observed tendency confirms our remarks of the influence of maternal diet rich in dairy food on the rumenic acid concentration in breast milk. Dairy products are also a valuable source not only of calcium but also of iodide, which is essential to fetal development [16]. Surprisingly our data also show that cis-9, trans-11 octadecadienoate consumption was lower in the group of frequent beef consumption. The increased intake of pork, veal and poultry did not cause any significant changes in the fat and CLA concentration. Ruminant meat like beef or veal are good dietary sources of conjugated linoleic acids and their intake should have caused higher CLA amounts in milk [17], but in our study differences in beef and veal consumption between groups were not significant, and this could be the main reason of our surprising findings. Also a frequent fish consumption influenced the rumenic acid concentration in maternal milk, causing a significant decrease of its amount (p=0.0273). There were also no significant differences in the RA or fat content in human milk among the groups of different frequency of cold meats consumption. Białek A et al. The impact of selected nutritional factors on cis-9, trans-11 octadecadienoate content in milk ... Part I. Conclusions 1. The diet of breastfeeding mothers and their nutritional habits have a great influence on the content of both fat and rumenic acid in their milk. 843 2. Milk and dairy products are a valuable source of many important nutrients in the diet of pregnant and breastfeeding women, e.g. rumenic acid, which is significant for infant health. Piśmiennictwo / References 1. Jensen RG, Ferris AM, et al. Lipids of Bovine and Human Milk: A Comparison. J Dairy Sci 1990, 73: 223-240. 2. Mojska H, Socha P, et al. Trans fatty acids in human milk in Poland and their association with breastfeeding mothers’ diets. Acta Paediatr 2003, 92: 1381-1387. 3. Hachey DL, Thomas MR, et al. Human lactation: maternal transfer of dietary triglicerides labeled with stable isotopes. J Lipid Res 1987, 52: 1185-1192. 4. Mitchell PL, Langille MA, et al. Effects of conjugated linoleic acid isomers on lipoprotein and atherosclerosis in the Syrian golden hamster. Biochim Biophys Acta 2005, 1734: 269‑276. 5. Valeille K, Ferezou J, Amsler G. A cis-9,trans-11-conjugated linoleic acid-rich oil reduces the outcome of atherogenic process in hyperlipidemic hamster. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2005, 258: H652-H659. 6. Blankson H, Stakkestad JA, et al. Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) reduces body fat mass in overweight and obese humans. J Nutr 2000, 130: 2943-2948. 7. Gaullier JM, Halse J, et al. Supplementation with conjugated linoleic acid for 24 months is well tolerated and reduces body fat mass in healthy, overweight humans. J Nutr 2005, 135: 778-784. 8. Ip C, Dong Y, et al. Conjugated linoleic acid isomers and mammary cancer prevention. Nutr Cancer 2002, 43(1): 52-58. 9. Kelley NS, Huang YW, et al. Conjugated linoleic acid isomers and cancer. J Nutr 2007, 137: 2599-2607. 10. Turpeinen AM, von Willbrand E, et al. Effects of cis-9, trans11 CLA in rats at intake levels reported for breast-fed infants. Lipids 2006, 41(7): 669-677. 11. Chin SF, Storkson JM, et al. Conjugated Linoleic Acid is a growth factor for rats as shown by enhanced weight gain and improved feed efficiency. J Nutr 1994, 124: 2344‑2349. 12. Christie WW, Sebedio JL, Juaneda P. A practical guide to the analysis of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA). Inform 2001, 12: 147-152. 13. Park Y, McGuire MK, et al. High-fat dairy product consumption increases Δ9c,11t-18:2 (rumenic acid) and total lipid concentrations of human milk. Lipids 1999, 34(6):543-549. 14. Ritzenthaler KL, McGuire MK, et al. Consumption of Conjugated Linoleic Acid (CLA) from CLA-enriched cheese does not alter milk fat or immunity in lactating women. J Nutr 2005, 135: 422-430. 15. Moutsioulis AA, Rule DC, et al. Human breast milk enrichment in conjugated linoleic acid after consumption of a conjugated linoleic acid-rich food products; a pilot study. Nutr Res 2008, 28: 437-442. 16. Waszkowiak K, Szymandera-Buszka K, Szewczyk M. Udział produktów mlecznych jako źródła jodu w diecie kobiet ciężarnych. Probl Hig Epidemiol 2010, 91(4): 560-563. 17. Chin SF, Liu W, et al. Dietary sources of conjugated dienoic isomers of linoleic acid, a newly recognized class of anticarcinogens. J Food Compos Anal 1922, 5: 185-197.