Management`s Presentation for GRUPA IMPEL
Transkrypt
Management`s Presentation for GRUPA IMPEL
GRUPA IMPEL Management’s Presentation for Q1-3 2016, 14 November 2016. COMMENTS TO Q1-3 2016 RESULTS Major tendencies and events having impact on Q1-3 2016 results ü Continued growth of sales revenue PLN + 166,6 million i.e. 12,5 % ü Growth in revenue in both operating segments: • • Facility Management PLN + 156,9 million i.e. 12,9 % Business Process Outsourcing PLN + 9,7 million i.e. 8,0 % Basic items from the financial statements of the Impel Group 2015 [PLN million] Q1-3 2015 [PLN million] Q1-3 2016 [PLN million] Change Q1-3 2016 vs. Q1-3 2015 Sales revenue 1,810.6 1,338.2 1,504.8 12.5% Operating expenses 1,801.6 1,326.2 1,502.5 13.2% Subsidies 40.7 31.7 30.0 -5.4% EBIT 48.1 40.1 35.0 -12.7% EBIT margin 2.7% 3.0% 2.3% -0.7pp EBITDA 100.6 79.7 74.9 -6.0% EBITDA margin 5.6% 6.0% 5.0% -1.0pp Net profit 22.9 23.1 21.6 -6.5% 2 Q1-3 2016 RESULTS: REVENUE FROM SALES, EBIT, EBITDA AND NET PROFIT Sales revenue Przychody ze sprzedaży 2000 1 810,6 1 683,9 change Q1-3 2016/ Q1-3 2015 + 12,5 % 1 559,7 1600 EBIT 70 60,6 60 1 504,8 1 416,7 1 338,2 1240,4 change zmiana Q1-3 2016/ Q1-3 2015 - 12,7 % 53,1 50 1200 45,2 6% 48,1 41,7 4% 40,1 40 35,0 30 800 2% 20 400 10 0 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Revenue Przychody Q1-3 2015 Q1-3 2016 0% 2011 2012 EBITDA 97,6 86,0 100,6 83,9 76,8 80,0 change Q1-3 2016/ Q1-3 2015 - 6,0 % 79,7 74,9 10% 58,9 50 4% 40,0 2% 0% 2012 2013 EBITDA 2014 2015 marża margin Q1-3 2015 Q1-3 2016 6% 4% 40 30,4 28,2 30 22,9 23,1 21,6 16,3 20 0,0 Q1-3 2016 8% 60,0 20,0 Q1-3 2015 zmiana Q1-3 2016/ Q1-3 2015 - 6,5 % 70 60 6% 2011 2014 2015 margin EBIT marża Net profit Zysk netto 120,0 100,0 2013 2% 10 0 0% 2011 2012 2013 Zysk netto 2014 2015 marża margin Net profit Q1-3 2015 Q1-3 2016 3 FACTORS INFLUENCING Q1-3 2016 RESULTS wPLN mlnmillion zł Przychody ze sprzedaży Sales revenue 2015 2015 1 810,6 Q1-3 2015 Q1-3 2015 1 338,2 Q1-3 2016 Q1-3 2016 1 504,8 change Zmiana 40,7 31,7 30,0 -5,4% 1 801,6 1 326,8 1 502,5 13,2% 100,6 79,7 74,9 -6,0% 5,6% 6,0% 5,0% 48,1 40,1 35,0 2,7% 3,0% 2,3% (52,5) (39,6) (39,9) 0,8% 22,9 23,1 21,6 -6,5% Assets Aktywa Capital Kapitały 894,8 911,1 1 027,5 12,8% 314,7 295,8 314,1 6,2% Net debt Dług netto 192,0 218,8 251,1 14,8% Dotacje Subsidies Koszty działalności Cost of operatingoperacyjnej activity EBITDA EBITDA marża EBITDA EBTDA margin EBIT EBIT marża EBIT EBIT margin Amortyzacja Amortisation/depreciation Net result Wynik netto 12,5% -12,7% change Q1-3 2016 / Q1-3 2015 PLN + 166,6 million. EBIT contains: PLN +3,1 million of profit from disposal of tangible assets (Impel Cleaning sp. z o.o.) PLN -3,1 million „valorization bonuses” 4 COMPARISON OF QUARTERLY OPERATING RESULTS w Inmln PLNPLN million Q1 Q2 2014 Q3 Q4 Y Q1 Q2 2015 Q3 Q4 Y Q1 2016 Q2 Q3 Przychody ze sprzedaży 394,7 416,7 431,6 443,4 1 686,4 423,6 449,1 465,6 472,3 1 810,6 471,5 505,6 527,7 Sales revenue Subsidies Dotacje 9,4 8,2 8,9 9,6 36,1 10,1 10,9 10,7 9,0 40,7 9,5 10,0 10,5 EBITDA EBITDA 19,0 25,1 32,3 21,7 97,6 22,3 25,1 32,3 23,4 100,6 19,4 25,9 29,6 marża EBITDA EBITDA margin 4,8% 6,0% 7,5% 5,3% 5,8% 5,3% 5,6% 6,9% 5,3% 5,6% 4,1% 5,1% 5,6% EBIT 8,1 14,2 21,7 9,1 53,1 9,3 11,8 19,0 8,0 48,1 6,4 12,6 16,0 EBIT margin marża EBIT 2,1% 3,4% 5,0% 2,1% 3,1% 2,2% 2,6% 4,1% 1,7% 2,7% 1,4% 2,5% 3,0% EBIT ü Losses/ completion of part of UPC (cleaning services due to valorisation ü Disclosure in Q4’2015 provisions of bonuses for employess engaged in the process of contract of process valorisation ü Charakteristics of result growth in successive quarters similar to those in previous years policy of provisions for employee holidays, ü Lower than last year’s use of SDE system 5 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL RESULTS OF THE GROUP - SEGMENTS PLNPLN w mln Razem total million FM* change Zmiana BPO* * Zmia Zm Zmiana iana ia na Zmia Zm Zmiana iana ia na Q1-3 2015 Q1-3 2016 Q1-3 2016 Q1-3 2015 Q1-3 2015 Q1-3 2016 Q1-3 2016 Q1-3 2015 Q1-3 2015 Q1-3 2016 Q1-3 2016 Q1-3 2015 Przychody ze sprzedaży Sales results 1 338,2 1 504,8 166,6 12,5% 1 216,4 1 373,3 156,9 12,9% 121,8 131,5 9,7 8,0% Wynik segmentu Segment results 43,3 34,3 30,2 18,4 13,1 15,9 Segmentsegmentu Rentowność 3,2% 2,3% 2,5% 1,3% 10,7% 12,1% profitability Segment result is influenced by: ü Completion/loss of part of valorised contracts, ü Use of SDE system considerably below maximum (currently approx. 26%). * The FM segment includes the former companies of Facility Management segment and those of manned guarding of property ** The BPO segment includes contains companies dealing in supporting business processes and provision of deliveries; formerly the companies grouped as independent and supporting companies, and cash processing companies (formerly in Security segment). BPO segment also includes supporting companies not defined in the core activities i.e. licensing services and financial operations on financial assets of selected Group companies, financial services, rental of real estate and services relating to marketing activity 6 FACTORS AFFECTING THE GROUP RESULTS IN SUCCESSIVE PERIODS ü Renegotiations contracts due to changes in law, imposing increased cost of labour as of 1 January 2017 as a result of increase in minimum wage and introduction of minimum hourly rate for employees, ü Completion of an agreement for creation, use and development of System of Electronic Surveillance (SDE): • The chances for reversing the trend and gradual increase in convicts relating to bringing back (April 2016) the previous regulations (from before 1 July 2015 • Decision on lawsuit filed by Impel Security Polska sp. z o.o. against State Treasury – the Minister of Justice, under which the Court is demanded to change the conditions of remuneration from the agreement binding the parties (supplement of the agreement with the provision providing for minimum remuneration payable to Impel Security Polska sp. z o.o.) Positive effects of internal changes: • Synergy from merging organizational structures of the Group within FM, • Consolidation of services in BPO – package of financial, accounting and IT service based on specialized companies of the Group, • ü Fluctuations in UAH/PLN and PLN/EUR currency exchange rate ü The risk of losing receivables from loans granted by Impel Group companies to Logistics sp. zo.o. 7 THE IMPEL GROUP – STRATEGIC TARGETS Facing dynamic changes on the labour market the Impel Group revised its mid-term strategy. We focus on: ü Activity in three areas: • Facility Management, • Business Process Outsourcing & Digital Services, • Industrial Services, ü Basing of services on new IT technologies, ü Enhancing our attractiveness as an employer, ü Creating services together with Customers, ü Strenghtening relations with Customers, ü Focus on Key Customers and segments of the market, ü Stable growth of the business, ü Efficient managing of capital. 8 FM – SHARE IN MARKET 2015*. UPC TON Impel 18,2% ISS Facility BEZP SPIE 2,6% 3,7% 2,1% Clar System 2,0% Dozorbud 16,9% Konsalnet Gegenbauer Grupa Ever Solid 9,8% 2,2% Impel Impel 1,5% Cofely UPC – cleaning services; TON – usługi technical maintenance of property; UPC porządkowo – czystościowe BEZP––usługi manned and electronic guarding of property TON technicznej obsługa i nieruchomości BEZP – usługi fizycznej i technicznej ochrony mienia 7,6% 1,9% 1,3% Securitas 3,2% Juwentus 2,8% * According to MarketCo Sp. z o.o.. data ** Revenue of Konsalnet after consolidation with G4S BPO – POTENTIAL FOR GROWTH OF IMPEL GROUP SEGMENT Usługi IT 10% 3% 4% 33% Finanse i Księgowość Obsługa Klienta 13% Bankowość, Ubezpieczenia HR The value of BPO market (Business Process Outsourcing) in the EU reached USD 109 billion in 2015, forecasted CAGR in 2016-2018 +6%. The Polish BPO market is not fully described and measured, but Poland has long been perceived as an attractive location for global SSE. The following entities can be found on the Polish BPO market: • global companies (PWC, E&Y) • local companies (Arteria, OEX, TAXCare) • common services centres of Polish companies (Tauron, PZU, Poczta Polska). The Impel Group answering this trend is building a uniform offer in BPO. The total revenue of the Group’s companies in 2015 from BPO services amounted to PLN 204.13million *** 15% 22% Zarządzanie Łańcuchem Dostaw Employment structure in service centres in Poland (by process categories ****) *** External revenue of Impel Business Solutions sp. z o.o., SI-Consulting sp. z o.o., Sanpro Job Service ‘BPO” sp. z o.o. S.K., Sanpro – PTS „BPO” sp. z o.o. S.K., and Synergy Platform sp. z o.o. ****Source: Sektor nowoczesnych Usług biznesowych w Polsce 2015; raport ABSL 9 THE IMPEL GROUP – STRUCTURE AND POTENTIAL. Structure of the Impel Group Impel S.A. FM BPO * 51 companies 17 companies Potential in FM ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü over 17 million m2 kept clean cleaning of 15,000 properties performing services for all sectors of the market FM services available 24 hours a day support for 200 healthcare units delivery of 200,000 pieces of clothing a month sales and delivery of products to over 4,000 facilities a month across Poland preparation of over 40,000 meals a day laundry of over 1,000 tons of linen a month supply of staff thus being 7th largest work agency among 3,000 competitors 19 000 security guards 15,000 Intervention Groups actions a month Potential in BPO ü ü ü ü ü ü ü support for nearly 85,000 people working in personnel&payroll over 200,000 accounting documents a month; nearly 25,000 business trips settled yearly 350 strong team of specialists in accounting, HR taxes in 15-branch network of the Company we support 5,000 IT service calls a month support for 73%* of commercial banks* Poland using cash processing service Support for every fifth ATM in Poland Alarm Receiving Centre supporting 3 million signals a month *BPO segment also includes supporting companies not defined in the core activities i.e. licensing services and financial operations on financial assets of selected Group companies, financial services, rental of real estate and services relating to marketing activity **ranking of „Bank” monthly – list of 24 largest banks 10 Thank you