Panel efektów ksztaŕcenia

Panel efektów kształcenia
2015-02-25
Strona: 1
Some basic information about the module
The name of the faculty organization unit: The faculty Civil, Environmental Engineering and Architecture
The name of the discipline:
The area of study: technical sciences
The profile of studing: general academic
The level of study: second degree study
Type of study: full time
discipline specialities :
The degree after graduating from university:
The name of the module department : Department of Building Conservation
The name of the module:
The code of the module: 6579
The module status: mandatory for teaching programme
The position in the studies teaching programme: sem: 2 / W15 P45 / 6 ECTS
The language of the lecture: Polish
The name of the coordinator 1: Marek Gosztyła, DSc, PhD, Eng.
The contact details of the coordinator 1: the building , room , phone , [email protected]
The name of the coordinator 2: Bartłomiej Tomkowicz, MSc, PE
The contact details of the coordinator 2: the building , room , phone , [email protected]
The name of the coordinator 3: Tomasz Huk, MSc, Eng., PE
The contact details of the coordinator 3: the building V, room , phone , [email protected]
The name of the coordinator 4: Anna Małachowicz, MSc, Eng., PE
The contact details of the coordinator 4: the building V, room 124, phone 2106, [email protected]
office hours of the coordinator: wednesday 16.30-18.30
Other teachers in this module
semester 2: Tomasz Tomaszek, PhD, office hours
Strona: 2
The aim of studing and bibliography
The main aim of studing: Familiarisation with story and evolution of relic preservation, building skills to correct interpretation of conservatory
processes and objects and spatial foundations placed in preservation zone.
The general information about the module: Familiarisation with chosen aspects from subject. Explanation of basic terminology. Charakteristic of
preservation evolution from antiquity to present. Knowing metodology of preservation work. Familiarisation with preservation story in Poland.
Bibliography required to complete the module
Bibliography used during lectures
1. W. Borusiewicz
Konserwacja zabytków budownictwa murowanego
2. M. Brykowska
Metody pomiarów i badań zabytków architektury.
Warszawa ., 1985
Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej,
Warszawa., 2003
Restauracja i konserwacja zabytków architektury w Polsce w
Wyd. PWN, Warszawa., 1975
latach 1795 – 1918.
Wyd. 2 zm, Ośrodek Ochrony i Konserwacji Zabytków,
4. W. Jaskulski, S. Kocewiak, P. Ogrodzki, Vademecum ochrony obiektów sakralnych.
J. Rulewicz
Warszawa., 1996
Ochrona zabytków architektury. T.1, Rozwój doktryn i teorii:
5. A. Kadłuczka
Politechnika Krakowska, Kraków ., 2000
(vademecum).
3. J. Frycz
Bibliography used during classes/laboratories/others
1. L. Majdecki
2. E. Małachowicz
3. E. Małachowicz
4. B. M. Pawlicki
Ochrona i konserwacja zabytkowych założeń ogrodowych.
Ochrona środowiska kulturowego, T. 1-2.
Konserwacja i rewaloryzacja architektury w zespołach i krajobrazie.
Strategia konserwacji zabytków architektury w Polsce.
Warszawa ., 1993
wyd. 2, Warszawa ., 1988
Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej, Wrocław., 1994
Politechnika Krakowska, Kraków., 1993
Bibliography to self-study
1. J. Pruszyński
Dziedzictwo kultury Polski. Jego straty i ochrona prawna, T. 1-2.
2. M. Przyłęcki, pod red. J. Ważnego i J. Ochrona i rewaloryzacja obiektów zabytkowych [w:] Ochrona budynków przed korozją
Karysia
biologiczną.
3. B. Rymaszewski
Klucze ochrony zabytków w Polsce.
Prawne problemy procesu inwestycyjno-budowlanego i konserwatorskiego - Stan prawny
4. I. Skrzydło-Niżnik, P. Dobosz
na 1 stycznia 200
wyd. Zakamycze, Kraków.,
2001
wyd. Arkady, Warszawa.,
2001
Warszawa., 1992
wyd. Zakamycze, Kraków.,
2002
Extra bibliography
1. J. Pruszyński Ochrona zabytków w Polsce. Geneza, organizacja, prawo.
2. red. E. Okoń
Zabytkowe budowle drewniane i stolarka architektoniczna wobec współczesnych zagrożeń.
3.
Zarys problematyki ochrony zabytków. Skrypt dla uczestników kursów Towarzystwa Opieki
nad Zabytkami.
http://nwpei.prz.rzeszow.pl/ek/ek.pl
Warszawa., 1989
Wydaw. Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika, Toruń
., 2005
Warszawa ., 1996
1/3
Panel efektów kształcenia
2015-02-25
J.
4. Zachwatowicz Ochrona zabytków w Polsce.
Wydaw. Polonia, Warszawa., 1965
Teaching materials: prezentacje multimedialne
others: wzorcowe dokumentacje
Strona: 3
Basic requirements in category knowledge/skills/social competences
Formal requirements: Termination course in range history of architecture, history of polish architecture, architecture and urbanistic, conservation
and preservation of relics
Basic requirements in category knowledge: Has basic knowledge from metody of preservation work and conservatory designing.
Basic requirements in category skills: Projecting investigative strategy and conservatory programs.
Basic requirements in category social competences: Maintains precaution interpreting the results of investigation, is working in investigative team.
Strona: 4
Module outcomes
MEK The student who completed the module
Types of classes / teaching methods
leading to achieving a given outcome of
teaching
01. Know and understand processes and procedure lecture, individual project
for conservatory work.
Know and understad the methody and manner of
02. preservation used in Poland and in foreign
lecture, individual project
countries
Know to form diagnosis and opinions about
03.
lecture, individual project
existing state of storical relics
04. Has skill to prepare conservatury directions
Has consciousness of architect role in
05. preservation
06.
Present readiness to take liability to design
solutions respect the storical relics
lecture, individual project
The ways of veryfing every
Związki z Związki z
mentioned outcome of
KEK
OEK
teaching
project presentation, written
T2A_W03++
K_W009++
examination
T2A_W04++
written examination, project
presentation
written examination, project
presentation
written examination, project
presentation
lecture, individual project
written examination, project
presentation
lecture, individual project
written examination, project
presentation
T2A_W03++
K_W010++ T2A_W04++
K_U009++
T2A_U10+
T2A_U15++
K_U010++ T2A_U10++
T2A_K01++
T2A_K02++
K_K005++
K_K011+++ T2A_K03+++
T2A_K05+++
T2A_K06+++
T2A_K01+++
T2A_K02++
T2A_K03++
K_K011+++
T2A_K04++
K_K014+++ T2A_K05++
T2A_K06++
T2A_K07+++
Strona: 5
The syllabus of the module
realized
MEK
in
TK01 Familiarisation with basic terms and range of heritage preservation
W1, P1 MEK01
MEK03
Aspects of preservation and revalorisation of urba and architectonical foundations and landscape protection. Function and meaning
MEK02
TK02 of storical relic in society perception. Primary and cultural landscape. Outline of evolution of term preservation.
W2, P2 MEK05
W3, P3- MEK01
TK03 Adaptation of existing structure and integration with modern form.
P6
MEK03
Revitalisation of disabled foundations. Metody of preservation work in storical foundations. Discusion on processes in design work W4, P7- MEK01
TK04
and their realisation on individual part.
P9
MEK06
Conservatory problems in urban and architectonical foundations (on example of town, rural and architectonical - landscape
W5,
MEK04
TK05 foundations)
P10-P11 MEK05
W6,
MEK02
TK06 Conservatory problems in palace - park foundations
P12-P13 MEK04
MEK01
Questions of integration modern forms with storical and traditional forms in enclosing. Conservatory realization: executive
TK07
W7, P14 MEK03
qualifications, research and preservation work documentation.
MEK05
Sem. TK
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
The content
Strona: 6
The student's effort
The type of
classes
The work before classes
The paticipation in classes
The work after classesZDYPT
complementing/reading through notes:
5.00 hours/sem.
Lecture
(sem. 2)
The preparation for a test: 10.00 hours/sem.
Project/Seminar
(sem. 2)
The preparation for projects/seminars:
35.00 hours/sem.
contact hours: 15.00 hours/sem.
Studying the recommended bibliography:
5.00 hours/sem.
contact hours: 45.00 hours/sem..
Doing the project/report/ Keeping records:
35.00 hours/sem.
The preparation for the presentation: 5.00 hours/sem.
Advice
(sem. 2)
The preparation for Advice: 5.00 hours/sem.
Exam
(sem. 2)
The preparation for an Exam: 15.00 hours/sem.
The participation in Advice:
2.00 hours/sem.
The written exam: 2.00 hours/sem.
http://nwpei.prz.rzeszow.pl/ek/ek.pl
The oral exam: 1.00 hours/sem.
2/3
Panel efektów kształcenia
2015-02-25
Strona: 7
The requirements for receiving a credit for a class
The student who completed the module
with the grade 3
with the grade 4
not only reached the level of knowledge and skills
required for the grade 3, but also capture knowledge in
range 80%.
Know and understad the methody and manner not only reached the level of knowledge and skills
of preservation used in Poland and in foreign required for the grade 3, but also capture knowledge in
countries
range 80%.
not only reached the level of knowledge and skills
Know to form diagnosis and opinions about
required for the grade 3, but also capture knowledge in
existing state of storical relics
range 80%.
not only reached the level of knowledge and skills
Has skill to prepare conservatury directions
required for the grade 3, but also capture knowledge in
range 80%.
Has consciousness of architect role in
has specific social competences
preservation
Present readiness to take liability to design
has specific social competences
solutions respect the storical relics
Know and understand processes and
procedure for conservatory work.
with the grade 5
not only reached the level of knowledge and skills required
for the grade 4, but also capture knowledge in range 90 100%.
not only reached the level of knowledge and skills required
for the grade 4, but also capture knowledge in range 90 100%.
not only reached the level of knowledge and skills required
for the grade 4, but also capture knowledge in range 90 100%.
not only reached the level of knowledge and skills required
for the grade 4, but also capture knowledge in range 90 100%.
has specific social competences
has specific social competences
The student who reached the intended level of knowledge, learned the required skills, who has specific social competences ,
wich are defined in module outcomes, completes the module
The student who didn't achieve the module outcomes, doesn't complete the module
The way of giving the component module grades and the final grade
The type of classes
Lecture
Project/Seminar
The final grade
The way of giving the final grade
Written examination
DEstimate of presented project, final presentation and activity in the course
Average of the evaluation from the examination (0.5 final evaluation) and of project (0.5 final evaluation).
Strona: 8
Sample problems
Required during the exam/when receiving the credit
Realized during classes/laboratories/pojects
Others
Can a student use any teaching aids during the exam/when receiving the credit: no
drukuj
http://nwpei.prz.rzeszow.pl/ek/ek.pl
3/3