1,5-diphenyl-1h-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl
Transkrypt
1,5-diphenyl-1h-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl
Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica ñ Drug Research, Vol. 63 No. 4 pp. 255ñ259, 2006 ISSN 0001-6837 Polish Pharmaceutical Society SYNTHESIS OF NEW 1-(AMINO)-3-[(1,5-DIPHENYL-1H-1,2,4-TRIAZOL-3-YL) OXY] PROPAN-2-OL AND 1-[(1,5-DIPHENYL-1H-1,2,4-TRIAZOL-3-YL) OXY]-3-(4-ARYLPIPERAZIN-1-YL) PROPAN-2-OL DERIVATIVES WITH AN EXPECTED β-ADRENOLYTIC ACTIVITY JERZY KOSSAKOWSKIa, MARTA STRUGAa and ANNA E. KOZIO£b a The Medical University, Department of Medical Chemistry, 3 Oczki Str., 02-007 Warsaw b Faculty of Chemistry, Maria Curie-Sk≥odowska University, 20-031 Lublin, Poland Abstract: 3-(Oxiran-2-ylmethoxy)-1,5-diphenyl-1H-1,2,4-triazole [I] was obtained in the reaction of 1,5-diphenyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-ol with 2-(chloromethyl) oxirane. Then I was converted into the corresponding aminoalkanol derivatives of 1,5-diphenyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-ol, IIa,b ñVIIa,b. Molecular structure of I was confirmed by an X- ray structure analysis. The receptor affinities for IVa, VIIa were determined. Keywords: 1,5-diphenyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-ol, substitution reaction, X-ray structure analysis, β-adrenoceptor, [H3] CGP 12177 binding Derivatives of 1H-1,2,4-triazole are reported to show a broad spectrum of biological activities such as antifungal, antimicrobial, hypoglycemic, antihypertensive, analgesic, antiparasitic, hypocholesteremic, antiviral, anti-inflammatory, antitumor and anti-HIV properties (1-18). Compounds from this group are also used as herbicides (19, 20) and fungicides (21, 22). These observations prompted us to synthesize some new 1,2,4-triazol-3-one derivatives with potential biological activity. This paper presents the preparation of a number of new derivatives of 1,5-diphenyl-1H-1,2,4triazol-3-ol with an expected β-adrenolytic activity. 1,5-Diphenyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-ol derivatives can exist in two tautomeric forms: ves with soothing effect on the central nervous system (24, 25). This paper is a continuation of investigations on nucleophilic substitution of pharmacophoric group into the 3H-1,2,4-triazol-3-one system. The 3-amino-2-hydroxypropyl group is characteristic for compounds possessing analgesic (28, 29), hypotensive and antiarrhytmic (30, 31) activities. 1,5-Diphenyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-ol was obtained in the reaction of phenyl hydrazine and benzoyl isocyanate (32). The reaction of 1,5-diphenyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-ol with 2-(chloromethyl) oxirane in the presence of anhydrous K2CO3 was carried out at room temperature. In the IR spectrum of compound I, the characteristic absorption band at 1700-1715 cm-1 for the C=O group, indicating the 1,5-diphenyl-1H-1,2,4triazol-3-ol form, was not observed. The molecular structure of this compound was confirmed by an X-ray analysis (Figure 1). Then compound I was converted with appropriate amines into corresponding aminoalkanol derivatives of 1,5-diphenyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-ol IIa, b ñVIIa, b (Figure 2). The reactions were performed by heating the reactants in methanol in the presence of small quantities of water. The structure of all new compounds was confirmed by elemental analysis as well as by the 1H NMR spectra. Radioligand binding studies were carried out for compounds (IVa and VIIa) in the Department of Cytobiology and Histochemistry, Collegium Medicum, Jagiellonian University. The binding data of the compounds are presented in Table 1. The tested In earlier papers, studying properties of these derivatives, some nucleophilic substitution reactions were carried out to obtain O- or N- derivatives (23 ñ 27). In the case of 4-phenyl-4,5-dihydro-1H-1,2,4triazol-3-one and 4,5-diphenyl-4,5-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazol-3-one in the nucleophilic substitution reaction a lot of new compounds with potential pharmacological action were obtained, e.g. N-aminomethyl derivatives and N-aminoalkanol derivati- 255 256 JERZY KOSSAKOWSKI et al. compound IVa showed a low affinity for β-adrenoceptor (Ki 9.2 ± 0.7 µM), whereas compound VIIa exibited no receptor affinity (Ki > 100). EXPERIMENTAL Chemistry Melting points were determined in a capillary Koflerís apparatus and are uncorrected. The 1H NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker DMX400 spectrometer, operating at 400.13 MHz for 1H or on a Varian UNITYplus-200 spectrometer, operating at 199.97 MHz for 1H. The chemical shift values, expressed in ppm, were references downfield to TMS at ambient temperature. The IR spectra were recorded in KBr on a Perkin Elmer FT 1725X spectrophotometer. All values of microanalyses were within ± 0.4% of the calculated compositions. Column flash chromatography and TLC were performed on silica gel 60 (Merck) using chloroform or chloroform/methanol (19:1, v/v) mixture as eluent. Figure 2. Method of preparing the reported compounds. Figure 1. Perspective drawing of the molecule I. Second position of the disordered epoxide group is marked by open line. Bond distances within the heterocyclic ring system are: N1ñN2 1.372 (3); N2ñC3 1.315 (3); C3ñN4 1.341 (4); N4ñC5 1.334 (3); C5ñN1 1.348 (3) and C3ñO3 1.337 (3) Å. Synthesis of new 1-(amino)-3-[(1,5-diphenyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)oxy]propan-2-ol... Diffraction data for I were measured at 295 K on a KM4 diffractometer using variable scan speed in the ω-2θ scan mode and graphite monochromated CuKα radiation (λ = 1.54178 Å). 5-(Oxiran-2-ylmethoxy)-2,3-diphenyl-1H-1,2,4triazole [I] A mixture of 2,3-diphenyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5ol (0.015 mol), 2-(chloromethyl) oxirane (40 cm3) and anhydrous K2CO3 (4.5 g, 0.033 mol) was left at room temperature for 48 h. The inorganic precipitate was filtered off, the solvent was evaporated. The oily residue was extracted several times with boiling heptane. The crude product precipitated on cooling. Then the mixture was filtered and purified by flash chromatography (a developing system: chloroform). m.p. 108 -110OC. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ (ppm): 7.34 ñ 7.53 (m, 10H, arom.); 4.69 (d, 2H, CH2); 4.5 (d, 2H, CH2); 2.70 ñ 2,91 (m, 1H, CH). IR (cm-1) KBr: 3063 (CH arom.); 2944, 1411, 777 (CH alif.); 1378, 1178, 864 (C-O-C); 1599 (C=N). For C17H15N3O2 (293.32) calculated: 69.64% C, 5.11% H, 14.33% N; found: 70.0% C, 5.1% H, 14.5% N. C17H15N3O2, FW = 293.32, monoclinic, space group P21/n, a = 9.521 (2) Å, b = 8.408 (2) Å, c =18.790 (3) Å, α = 90O, β =102.26 (3)O, γ = 90O, V = 1499.8 (5) Å3, Z = 4, F (000) = 616, dcalc = 1.326 g cm-3, µ(CuKa) = 0.725 mm-1. In the θ range 4.82 ñ75.16O, 3043 reflections were collected. The structure was solved by direct methods using SHELXS-93 program (34). Refinement was performed by the full-matrix least-squares method on F2 using 2978 unique reflections (Rint = 0.027) and SHELXL-97 program (35). The Fourier maps indicated disorder of the epoxide fragment over two positions. The refinement of the site occupancy factors of three atoms (O2, C2 and C12) converged at 0.5. The non-hydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic displacement parameters. The H-atom positions were calculated from the geometry and were given isotropic factors of 1.2 Ueq of the bonded C-atoms; the CñH bond Ñridingî model was used in the refinement. For 227 parameters refined, final discrepancy factors are R1 = 0.0451, wσ2 = 0.1316 for 1286 reflections with I > 2s (I), and R1 = 0.1228, wσ2 = 0.1702 for all data, S = 1.041. Residual peaks on final difference map were -0.15 to 0.17 e Å3. Crystallographic data have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre as CCDC No. 602943. Copies of the data can be obtained on application to The Director, CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK, (Fax: +44- 257 1223-336-033; e-mail: [email protected] or www: http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk). General procedure of preparing 1-(amino)-5-[(2,3diphenyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl) oxy] propan-2-ol [IIa ñ VIIa] and 1-[(2,3-diphenyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl) oxy]-5-(4-arylpiperazin-1-yl) propan-2-ol [IIb ñ VIIb]. A mixture of the compound I (0.003 mol) and the corresponding amine (0.015 mol), was refluxed in a mixture of methanol and water (39:1 v/v) (40 cm3). The reaction was monitored by TLC. When the reaction was complete, the mixture was filtered and the solvent evaporated. The residue was crystallized from heptane [IIb ñ VIIb] or purified by flash chromatography (developing system: chloroform/methanol 9:1, v/v) [IIa ñ VIIa]. [IIa] m.p. 139OC. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ (ppm): 7.29 ñ 7.48 (m, 10H, arom.); 4.35 ñ 4.46 (qq, 2H, CH2-O); 4.09 ñ 4.1 (m, 1H, CH-O); 2.4 ñ 2.63 (m, 2H, CH2-N); 2.32 (s, 6H, CH3). For C19H22N4O2 (338.4) calculated: 67.44% C, 6.55% H, 16.56% N; found: 67.75% C, 6.48% H, 17.02% N. [IIIa] m.p. 78OC. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ (ppm): 7.29 ñ 7.48 (m, 10H, arom.); 4.4 (d, 2H, CH2, J=8 Hz); 4.07 (m, 1H, CH-O); 2,56-2.71 (m, 6H, CH2); 1.06 (t, 6H, CH3, J=7.2 Hz). For C21H26N4O (366.45) calculated: 68.83% C, 7.15% H, 15.29% N; found: 68.73% C, 7.2% H, 15.03% N. [IVa] m.p. 161-2OC. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ (ppm): 7.3 ñ 7.47 (m, 10H, arom.); 4.41 (d, 2H, CH2-O, J=5.2 Hz); 4.12 ñ 4.13 (m, 1H, CH-O); 2.78 ñ 2.94 (m, 2H, CH2-N); 1.68 (s, 9H, CH3). For C21H26N4O (366.45) calculated: 68.82% C, 7.15% H, 15.29% N; found: 68.88% C, 7.15% H, 15.28% N. [Va] m.p. 127-8OC. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ (ppm): 7.3 ñ 7.47 (m, 10H, arom); 4.36 ñ 4.43 (m, 2H, CH2); 4.07 ñ 4.12 (m, 1H, CH-O); 2.74 ñ 2.9 (m, 2H, CH-N); 1.07 (d, 6H, CH3, J=6.4 Hz). For C20H24N4O (352.4) calculated: 68.16% C, 6.86% H, 15.9% N; found: 67.95% C, 6.91% H, 15.76% N. [VIa] m.p. 123-4OC. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ (ppm): 7.37 ñ 7.47 (m, 10H, arom.); 4.96 (s, 1H, OH); 3.99 ñ 4.16 (m, 2H, CH2); 4.49 ñ 4.36 (m, 2H, CH2); 2.28-2.46 (m, 6H, (CH2)2 piper., CH2); 1.23 ñ 1.57 (m, 6H (CH2)3 piper., CH2). For C22H26N4O (378.46) calculated: 69.81% C, 6.92% H, 14.81% N; found: 70.06% C, 6.84% H, 14.71% N. [VIIa] m.p. 99-100OC. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ (ppm): 7.29 ñ 7.47 (m, 10H, arom.); 4.35 ñ 4.43 (dq, 2H, CH2); 4.12 ñ 4.17 (m, 1H, CH-O); 3.6 (s, 1H, OH); 2.46 ñ 2.7 (m, 10H, CH2); 2.29 (s, 3H, CH3). For C22H27N5O2 (393.51) calculated: 67.15% C, 6.91% H, 17.80% N; found: 67.12% C, 6.62% H, 17.62% N. 258 JERZY KOSSAKOWSKI et al. [IIb] m.p. 181-2OC. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ (ppm): 7.29 ñ 7.48 (m, 10H, arom.); 6.86 ñ 6.94 (m, 5H, arom.); 4.45 (s, 2H, CH2); 4.29 (s, 1H, CH-O); 3.28 (s, 4H, CH2); 2.91 (s, 2H, CH2-N); 2.77 ñ 2.78 (m, 4H, (CH2)2-N). For C27H29N5O (455.54) calculated: 71.18% C, 6.42% H, 15.38% N; found: 71.02% C, 6.31% H, 15.34% N. [IIIb] m.p. 130OC. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ (ppm): 7.26 ñ 7.48 (m, 10H, arom.); 6.86 ñ 6.96 (m, 4H, arom.); 4.38 ñ 4.49 (m, 2H, CH2); 4.18 ñ 4.22 (m, 1H, CH-O); 3.59 (s, 1H, OH); 3.14 (s, 4H, (CH2)2-N); 2.71 ñ 2.74 (m, 2H, CH2-N); 2.61 ñ 2.69 (m, 4H, (CH2)2N). For C27H28FN5O2 (473.54) calculated: 68.48% C, 5.96% H, 14.79% N; found: 68.56% C, 5.82% H, 14.79% N. [IVb] m.p. 170-1OC. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ (ppm): 7.35 ñ 7.48 (m, 10H, arom.); 6.93 ñ 7.04 (m, 4H, arom.); 4.4 (m, 2H, CH2); 4.19 ñ 4.2 (m, 1H, CH-O); 3.13 (s, 4H, (CH2)2-N); 2.85 ñ 2.86 (m, 2H, CH2-N); 2.62 ñ 2.69 (m, 4H, (CH2)2-N). For C27H28FN5O2 (473.54) calculated: 68.48% C, 5.95% H, 14.79% N; found: 68.20% C, 5.88% H, 14.54% N. [Vb] m.p. 127-8OC. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ (ppm): 7.26 ñ 7.48 (m, 10H, arom.); 6.86 ñ 6.94 (m, 4H, arom.); 4.39 ñ 4.48 (m, 2H, CH2); 4.2 (s, 1H, CH-O); 3.87 (s, 3H, CH3-O); 3.12 (s, 4H, (CH2)2-N); 2.88 (s, 2H, CH2-N); 2.7 (s, 4H, (CH2)2-N). For C28H31N5O3 (485.57) calculated: 69.25% C, 6.44% H, 14.42% N; found: 69.28% C, 6.41% H, 14.39% N. [VIb] m.p. 173-4OC. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ (ppm): 8.17 (dd, 1H, Hα pyr., J1=0.5 Hz, J2=0.45 Hz); 7.47 (m, 1H, Hγ pyr.); 6.63 (m, 2H, Hβ pyr.); 4.52 ñ 4.36 (m, 2H, CH2); 4.26 ñ 4.15 (m, 1H, CH-O); 3.56 (t, 4H, (CH2)2-N, J=4.5 Hz); 2.83 ñ 2.56 (m, 6H, (CH2)2-N, CH2). For C26H28N6O2 (456.52) calculated: 68.40% C, 6.17% H, 18.4% N; found: 68.39% C, 5.97% H, 18.26% N. [VIIb] m.p. 140OC. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ (ppm): 7.267.47 (m, 15H, arom.); 4.35 ñ 4.45 (m, 2H, CH2); 4.13 ñ 4.15 (m, 1H, CH-O); 3.51 (s, 2H, CH2); 2.5 ñ 2.69 (m, 10H, (CH2)2-N, CH2). For C28H31N5O (469.57) calculated: 71.61% C, 6.65% H, 14.92% N; found: 71.87% C, 6.64% H, 14.76% N. Radioligand binding assay The experiment was carried out on the rat cerebral cortex. [3H] CGP-12177 (48 Ci/mmol) was used. Tissue was homogenized in 20 volumes of ice-cold 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.6), and centrifuged at 1000 × g for 10 min (0-4OC). The supernatant was centrifuged at 20 000 × g for 20 min. The cell pellet was resuspended in Tris-HCl buffer and centrifuged again. The final incubation mixture (final volume 300 µL) consisted of 240 µL membrane su- Table 1. The β-adrenoceptor affinities of the investigated compounds. Compound IVa VIIa Propranolol IC50 (µM) 20.5 ± 1.5 > 100 6.5 nM KI (µM) 9.2 ± 0.7 > 100 3 nM spension, 30 µL of [3H] CGP-12177 (0.2 nM) solution and 30 µL buffer containing from seven to eight concentrations (10-11 ñ 10-4 M) of the investigated compounds. For measuring unspecific binding, propranolol ñ 1 µM was applied. The incubation was terminated by rapid filtration over glass fiber filters (Whatman GF/C) using a vacuum manifold (Millipore). The filters were then washed 2 times with the assay buffer and placed in scintillation vials with liquid scintillation cocktail. Radioactivity was measured in a WALLAC 1409 DSA ñ liquid scintillation counter. All assays were done in duplicates. Radioligand binding data were analyzed using iterative curve fitting routines (GraphPAD/Prism, Version 3.02 ñ San Diego, CA, USA). Ki values were calculated from the Cheng and Prusoff equation (33): LO ñ labeled ligand concentration KD ñ dissociation constant of labeled ligand REFERENCES 1. Negwer M.: Organic-chemical drugs and their synonyms, Akademie Verlag, Berlin 1987, p. 950. 2. Negwer M.: Organic-chemical drugs and their synonyms, Akademie Verlag, Berlin 1987, p. 1300. 3. Negwer M.: Organic-chemical drugs and their synonyms, Akademie Verlag, Berlin 1987, p. 917. 4. Heeres J., Backx L.J.J., Van Cutsem J.: J. Med. Chem. 27, 894 (1984). 5. Bhat A., Bhat G., Shenoy G.G.: J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 53, 267 (2001). 6. Modzelewska-Banachiewicz B., Jagie≥≥o-WÛjtowicz E., Tokarzewska-Wielosz E.: Acta Pol. Pharm. 57, 199 (2000). 7. Varvaresou A., Tsntili-Kakoulidou A., Siatra-Papastaikoudi T., Tiligada E.: Arzneim.Forsch. 50, 48 (2000). Synthesis of new 1-(amino)-3-[(1,5-diphenyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)oxy]propan-2-ol... 8. Ulusoy N., Gursoy A., Otuk G.: Farmaco 56, 947 (2001). 9. Witkowski J.T., Robins R.K., Khare G.P., Sidwell R.W.: J. Med. Chem. 16, 935 (1973). 10. Burzowski Z.: Acta Pol. Pharm. 55, 473 (1998). 11. Hui X.P., Zhang L.M., Zhang Z.Y., Wang Q., Wang F.: J. Chin. Chem. Soc. 47, 535 (2000). 12. Katica C.R., Vesna D., Vlado K., Dora G.M.: Molecules 6, 815 (2001). 13. Wang Z., You T., Xu Y.: Molecules 1, 68 (1996). 14. Ikizler A.A., Ikizler A., Y¸ksek H., Serdar M.: Modelling, Measurement & Control C, AMSE Press, 1, 25 (1998). 15. Y¸ksek H., Demibas A., Ikizler A., Johansson C.B., Celik C., Ikizler A.A.: Arzneim.-Forsch. 47, 405 (1997). 16. Ikizler A.A., Demibas A., Johansson C.B., Celik C., Serdar M., Y¸ksek H.: Acta Pol, Pharm. 55, 117 (1997). 17. Ikizler A.A., Ucar F., Y¸ksek H., Aytin A., Yasa I., Gezer T.: Acta Pol. Pharm. 54, 135 (1997). 18. Demirbas A., Johansson C.B., Duman N., Ikizler A.A.: Acta Pol. Pharm. 53, 117 (1996). 19. Nandihalli U.B.: J. Agr. Food. Chem. 43, 193 (1992). 20. Feucht D., Dahmen P.: U.S. Pat. US2005043181 (2005). 21. Mueller K.H., Kirsten R., Gesing E.R.F. et al.: Ger. Pat. DE19508119 (1996). 22. Mueller K.H., Koenig K., Findeisen K. et al.: U.S. Pat. US5516749 (1996). 259 23. Dobosz M., Struga M.: Acta Pol. Pharm. 54, 313 (1997). 24. Dobosz M., Struga M.: Acta Pol. Pharm. 57, 123 (2000). 25. Dobosz M., Struga M., Chodkowska A., Jagie≥≥o-WÛjtowicz E.: Acta Pol. Pharm. 57, 363 (2000). 26. Dobosz M., Maliszewska-Guz A., Struga M., Kleinrok Z., Wielosz-Tokarzewska E., Jagie≥≥o-WÛjtowicz E.: Acta Pol. Pharm. 58, 35 (2001). 27. Dobosz M., Struga M., Chodkowska A., Jagie≥≥o-WÛjtowicz E., StÍpniak K., Kozio≥ A.E.: Acta Pol. Pharm. 59, 281 (2002). 28. Filipek B., Sapa J., Kulig K., Antkiewicz-Michaluk L.: Arch. Pharm. (Weinheim) 330, 225 (1997). 29. Sadowska H., Filipek B., Szkatula D. et al.: Farmaco 57, 897 (2002). 30. Sadowska H., Sabiniarz A., Filipek B., Kardasz M., Maciπg D.: Farmaco 58, 25 (2003). 31. Maciπg D., Filipek B., Czekaj T., Marona H., Nowak G.: Pharmazie 58, 899 (2003). 32. Tsuge O., Kanemasa S., Tashiro M.: Tetrahedron 24, 5205 (1968). 33. Cheng, Y.C., Prusoff, W.H.: Biochem. Pharmacol. 22, 3099 (1973). 34. G.M. Sheldrick: SHELXS-93: Program for crystal structure solution; University of Gˆttingen, Germany, (1993). 35. G.M. Sheldrick: SHELXL-97: Program for the refinement of crystal structures from diffraction data; University of Gˆttingen, Germany, (1997). Received: 5.05.2006