Szkoła Główna Służby Pożarniczej w Warszawie

The Main School of Fire Service in Warsaw
Faculty of Fire Safety Engineering
Academic year 2014/2015
DESCRIPTION OF INDIVIDUAL COURSE UNIT/MODULE
Cycle of study
Master Engineer degree studies – 2-nd cycle of studies
Field of study:
Safety Engineering
Specialty track:
Module/course name:
Safety systems design
(PSB)
Semester: II
Subject area code: PSB
Status: optional
Form of study: full-time/extramural
Language of instruction: English
Teaching
Completion
ECTS Credits: 2
methods/ teachmethods
ing load
Full-time studies:
Total: 2
Lecture –
Lecture
Exercises –
LaboratoriesProject work- 30h
Extramural studies:
LectureExercisesLaboratoriesProject work-16h
Lecture:
credit
Teaching
load
Exercise:
exam
Exercises
Laboratories
2
Project work
Students’ own effort
Module/course unit coordinator: Paweł Kępka, PhD
Responsible teacher: Paweł Kępka, PhD
1. Preresiquites:
Achieving learning outcomes in terms of: expertise in the design of safety systems; systems theory and
the theory of security; hazard mapping and risk maps; risk analysis; skills of specialized software to predict the effects of adverse events; research, analyses; conduct a comparison of alternatives; propose and
optimize new solutions; independently analyse problems in the field of safety engineering.
2. Description of learning outcomes:
The primary purpose of teaching is to familiarize the concepts and understanding of the design principles
of security systems; knowledge of the functionality and capabilities of specialized tools to support the decision; practical verification procedures for responding to crises. After completion of the course the graduate is prepared to work in the cells of both the public and private sectors dealing with security, in terms
of system security. Graduates are prepared to work independently; of analysis; use specialized software to
predict the effects of adverse events, taking into account legal solutions technical, procedural.
3. Detailed description of learning outcomes:
Major
Faculty Learning
Learning
Learning outcomes
Outcomes Code
Outcomes
Code
Knowledge
PSB_W1
The student knows the concepts of design safety systems and
systems theory, hazard mapping and risk maps, risk analysis,
literacy specialist programs to predict the effects of adverse
K_W19
PSB _W2
PSB _W3
PSB _W4
PSB _W5
events.
The student has knowledge of principles and methods for designing security systems. Able to classify entities with the
common characteristics of threats. Identifies threats entity - the
intensity of occurrence and the resulting characteristics of the
safety system.
The student is able to design automated control systems emergencies and crisis management (known stages of design and
defines their characteristics). It documents the work. Defines
the role and responsibilities of shareholders and users of automated management systems, rescue and crisis management.
The student knows the tasks of security systems. The student is
able to observe and define the inter-dependencies, make for
their analysis and risk assessment.
The student knows the principles for the design of safety systems and use them to work in the public and private sectors.
K_W22
K_W15
K_W17
K_W20
Skills
PSB _U1
PSB _U2
PSB _U3
PSB _U4
PSB _U5
PSB _K1
PSB _K2
PSB _K3
The student identifies the parameters of safety systems. He can
make the testing of security systems, their implementation and
control at every stage of life.
The student has the ability to observe, to reason and analyze
inter-dependencies in the context of monitoring the risks incidental and bulk Place specify what systems in the context of
eliminating threats.
The student is able to reasonably determine the need for procedural and technical and personal security risks specific situation of people and infrastructure, especially critical infrastructure.
The student applies knowledge gained during the development
of documents, programs and plans (at the stage of prevention,
preparedness, response and reconstruction), and the tasks and
the selection of security systems.
The student has the ability to interpersonal communication
with the proximal and distal environment in the process of organizing the coordination of assistance to victims and secure
their social and living needs.
Social competences
The student determines priorities and plans and organizes the
tasks related to the implementation of security systems and
their smooth operation.
The student is complying with the universally recognized as
valid, ie. Objectively, under its function. Notes and includes
environmental dilemmas and different options related to the
activities of industry.
The student is assertive and prepared to participate in social
initiatives comply with the requirements of legal, economic,
technical, environmental and social.
4. Detailed course program:
No.
1
Course content
K_U01
K_U05
K_U20
K_U03
K_U02
K_K05
K_K03
K_K02
Learning outcomes of
the Course or Module
The genesis of the design of security systems, security systems PSB_W1, PSB _W2,
design principles: determinants of legal, technical, organiza- PSB _U2, PSB _K1,
2
3
4
5
6
tional and procedural.
Rules for the drafting hazard maps and risk maps, introduction
to programs Aloha, Aloha UK, Marplot, Marplot UK and
Google Earth and Google Maps.
Principles and methods for the design of safety systems. Classification of entities with the common characteristics of
threats. Hazard identification of the entity.
Define inter-dependencies. Preliminary analysis and risk assessment. Documentation of work. The role and responsibilities of shareholders and users of automated control systems
emergencies and crisis management.
Determining the procedural requirements of technical personnel in a particular emergency situation without-safety of people and infrastructure, especially critical infrastructure.
Identification of key parameters of safety systems. Designing,
testing, implementation and monitoring of security systems at
every stage of life
PSB _W1, PSB _W2,
PSB _U1, PSB _U2,
PSB _W1, PSB _W4,
PSB _U2, PSB _U5,
PSB _W1, PSB _W5,
PSB _U3, PSB _U4,
PSB_K3
PSB _W4, PSB _W5,
PSB _U5, PSB _K1,
PSB _W1, PSB _W2,
PSB _W3, PSB _U1,
PSB _U2, PSB _U3,
PSB _U4, PSB _K1,
PSB _K2, PSB _K3
7
Rules for the use of safety systems in the public and private PSB _W2, PSB _W3,
sectors. Develop hazard maps, risk maps, risk profiles. Infer- PSB _W4, PSB _U1,
ence.
PSB _U3, PSB _U4,
PSB _U5, PSB _K1,
PSB _K2, PSB _K3
5. Teaching methods:
Project work - independent development of specific topics (solution); autopresentation including the rationale for a given topic of the proposed solutions; group discussion within the expert use of the method
on the presented solutions; presentation and the reasons given for the variant solution; Case study; prepared the project and comparing its results with others.
6. Student’s own effort:
The study of literature; development of specific topics (solution); project development (author's initiative
resulting from the existing legal solutions, knowledge and experience); involvement in initiatives related
subject; preparing to pass the project.
7. Recommended readings:
1. Wolanin Jerzy, Zarys teorii bezpieczeństwa, Wyd. Dagmar, Warszawa 2005.
2. Kępka Paweł, Bioterroryzm: Polska wobec uzycia broni biologicznej, Wyd. Difin, Warszawa
2009.
3. Ficoń K., Inżynieria zarządzania kryzysowego, Wyd. Bel Studio, Warszawa 2007.
4. Szymonik Andrzej, Organizacja i funkcjonowanie systemów bezpieczeństwa, Wyd. Difin, Warszawa 2011.
5. Szymonik A., Logistyka w bezpieczeństwie, Wyd. Difin, Warszawa 2010.
6. Kotowski Wojciech, Kurzępa Bolesław, Bezpieczeństwo imprez masowych, Wyd. Difin, Warszawa 2010.
7. Tyburska Agata, Ochrona infrastruktury krytycznej, Wyd. WSPol, Szczytno 2010.
8. Ustawa z dnia 26 kwietnia 2007 r. o zarządzaniu kryzysowym (Dz. U. z 2007 r. Nr 89, poz. 590).
9. Ustawa z dnia 22 sierpnia 1997 r. o ochronie osób i mienia (Dz. U. z 1997 r., Nr 114, poz. 740 z
późn. zm.).
10. Rozporządzenie Rady Ministrów z dnia 30 kwietnia 2010 r. w sprawie Raportu
o zagrożeniach bezpieczeństwa narodowego (Dz. U. z 2010 r., Nr 83, poz. 540).
11. Rozporządzenie Rady Ministrów z dnia 30 kwietnia 2010 r. w sprawie Narodowego Programu Infrastruktury Krytycznej (Dz. U. z 2010 r., Nr 83, poz. 541).
12. Rozporządzenie Rady Ministrów z dnia 30 kwietnia 2010 r. w sprawie planów ochrony infrastruktury krytycznej (Dz. U. z 2010 r., Nr 83, poz. 542).
13. Rozporządzenie Rady Ministrów z dnia 15 grudnia 2009 r. w sprawie określenia organów administracji rządowej, które utworzą centra zarządzania kryzysowego, oraz sposobu ich funkcjonowania.
8. Supplementary readings:
1. Stabryła Adam, Analiza i projektowanie systemów zarządzania przedsiębiorstwem.
2. Pieprzyk Josef i inni, Teoria bezpieczeństwa systemów komputerowych.
3. Ryszard Liderman, Analiza ryzyka i ochrona informacji w systemach komputerowych.
4. Pokrewne akty prawne.
5. Materiały dydaktyczne do przedmiotu „Wspomagane komputerowo projektowanie systemów
bezpieczeństwa”.
6. Wybrane strony internetowe nt. bezpieczeństwa w tym, systemów bezpieczeństwa i zasad ich projektowania
9. Completion method:
Assessment exercises to assess the project (item no final exam). Included design classes (generalized assessment) based on the arithmetic mean and the partial assessments of each project and current ratings obtained in the class (participation in the discussion, presentation and justification of the concept of the proposed solution of the problem) and the work of checking (solutions to problems and tasks).
10. Description of final grade calculation method:
Learning outMethod of calculation
comes
Project work
PSB_W1
x
PSB _W2
x
PSB _W3
x
PSB _W4
x
PSB _W5
x
PSB _U1
x
PSB _U2
x
PSB _U3
x
PSB _U4
x
PSB _U5
x
PSB _K1
x
PSB _K2
x
PSB _K3
x
Date:
Signature of responsible teacher/head of department:
Date:
Dean’s signature: