lR/,\ MoRAhla` ANDR1E] cotĄLAl Influence of comPatibiliz€r łTe
Transkrypt
lR/,\ MoRAhla` ANDR1E] cotĄLAl Influence of comPatibiliz€r łTe
52 I MlPo-LĄ\ ]lR/,\ MoRAhla'II,ANDR1E] cotĄLAl ANDRZE GAJ.ESK EWA IIOPKOWSKAIT 5loLl''' Influence of comPatibiliz€r łTe' PolyPloPylene moleculat weigth and blending sequence on ńontmo llonite exfoliation in nano.omPosites RAPID COMMUNICATION sunmary Mortmorilloniteeiloliationi"polynermaruisacrucDlhdor obiłi|inE a ńat*i.llrirh jmPoved baiiiet PloPshcs, r€dured fbnmibi. lit' hj8herela*t ńod!l$ and bńsilc *leryrh. onc of the włys lo obtajn PolyPoPyl.ne bafd nanmońPolie włh ńońfuorillonile ilvolles an aPpli .atjonof otpihbiljzss,forcx' Plcmalcicanhydridootaayli.aĆid graftd Pol],PrcPyl.m Thc cliccts of blcnding scqucnre' polyprÓPylene ńolEula! w.ighi' ald Propeti.s ol ł ĆomFatibil'd otr .x fuliation of monhoi llo ni tc I{tr prcpylcnc, monrmorilon e, exroliatiotr, Polyńc! ba5cd nańo<,ńFolics Wirh ńonfuolillo nite IMMT) arc rŃńdy th! \Ubjd .(d silic.t. con' sjślńg ofrnń th(k l'ycr' lńth ga]lffm bdwccn thcn omPicd by ark.li shons rn thcp nE,brc vith hyd roph i li. polynrB. ExdmnSe or ihosc .łiions with .aiioni'orEali. sur ot c M]VrT.ompaiibilitylfi thothcrl!ŚhydrcPhiliĆÓl elen hydlophobi. Folymeś. DispeBionand cxnnia onoIMMTiń i Polymsma tiiallo\4 lonodify ihc PfuPctics of th.ńatcń] _ to .Dh. n ( thc bificr ol Sascs . nd vapous pcrne ion, b rcducc flammibiliry and to implore iheinal sabilir), fic prcsncc or exlolia&d n,ortmo żn n(rcasc ol ihc modulLE Il lensil! śt.lgth'lm provcncnt ol pbpsrics is usuilly ob d Ą' loi d inE, noi ex.ed ing scvcra l Nlighi Pol .Ćnh ' NanocomPosit.s witl' ]Vl]v'T bł PolyProPrlerc (iPP) lve! alj) obraińcd nr thc p'śłnd | ,nPo in.. of this polyńdlrl Rcfclcn.cl2l(rcwsthcbułcsleadingb M MT na nocompGi t.s bi sd on iso tadic polyPrÓPylcnĆ ThcPcsibiliq,ioobtaine Óliłbd MMTbvńcltńi{mg ol oĘano. modiIiod lVllVlT \'iih PolyFroP]'Lcn._ Eraficd nalcic nryd ]e jsal$fuPofud l3l Thcuscofmłlci. a' lydride ńodificd FroPvLc|c oLi8oncFas comp.li bil'et fo. IPPIMMT syseń was ako skĆ*s'ully .x ofsaleies, whjrc MMTcr foliiijon iNÓlves a cońPl.lc scP' E hon ol.li]' li]'os Boih elf..ś6n bcsfodicd ciihcr by high rcsolution mi dosÓpy likc clc.hon hłnsmission mi.m{oPv or bv x tay sidc an€lc difrłdiondne io a rś!ędiv.ly sńall intelliyodishn.* o1MNfI Pa iĆlc! l5]' tn thc Pres€ni papł we inve*isal. the Ćffi.icncy of dllferenr .omparibirizcG, ihc innucn.c of mohculir weight of PÓlyProPvlcne and lhe bleMin8 mntlitions otr exIo1iatn,n oI oĘano-modified m Foly PlÓPy h nc bł*d MnoÓmPÓsit! sv*enl ' ch.rns r6uus inbroadenins Fo r ncar polypropylcncs an,r tlrc. grancd pol),pn) Fylens lscd łs .ontl]libiliŹos, lis rsld b plcparc ur composit* Th woght.nd henĆ.]nńdt oory ntc (M|{) ihcm ihc polish PrÓdud Włh broidcr molcculir wcighi ^moĘdistiPolypropylcne .ompatibilize^ ws.i adyln r(id 3lafbd PolyProPy]ene (6 lł' ,1' (,f flndi,nal souPs) and ńalcic anhydtidg gtalbd Fol)'PloPyLcn. o r( ,] and 0 5 wt '/o ol Iun.tional !tr!Pł rli8her ońccnta tion of mil€ic glouPs lcads Unavoidłbly in 'Lndioml to h,!hc! MrF thc cisc ol polypnpylenc POLIMERY 2004, Tabl 49, nr 1 e 1' characteristi.Ś 53 of polymeric comPońants used in nano.ońpÓsites oC) 3 0 (230 Ma]cn PF401, orl€n, Polan.{ Novolcn l1ootl. BAs!', Gcrńanv PIH r 8 (230 Novol.n ] l0(]L, l]A5Ę C]crmany Novol.n ]l00N, BAsĘ ccma|y 5 'C) '10 090"c) ]l009r "c) col I30Ę shovring Pcrlodicity of2'2 nm. composites coniairling 1PĘ a conpatibli1izer and MMT were obtained by two,step blcnding in a Brabendcl intenal mixer during 20 mrn mixing ar 60 rpm. Two \ĄIays ofsamPle PreParatiol wele used: A. iPP and a comparibilizer were blended - toRoute prior addition of MMT, boih blendnr8 sieps werc colrducted at 170 oC. B. A compatibilizer was first blended wirh - inRoute MMT weight proportion of 10:3 and later added to l?p melt. The firct blending siep was conducied at 200 oC (B1) or at 170 oC (ll2), while the second blendinS step was carried out always at 200 oC. Compos jtion of compatibilized sysiems and btending icmperaturcs are listed Table 2. For comparison, the sa'nPle .ÓdeŚ, .omPositionŚ and blćńdi.g temPerntu.e B loltes ol ŚamPl€s Pr.pa.ations' M de' duinabothstePs oi A and montrnor 5 5 105 ac.ylicłcid,6 wt''l, malcic anlr-\'dridc' ] trł. 'r' malciĆ anhydridc, t].5 wt l composites of iPP with MMT bur .ithout a compatibilizer were also obtained in one-pot btending proce, durc: both Ćo ponents were dry-biended and then ńelt intcmal mixer at 200 oC. 0.5-0.8 mm thick films were obtained from chunks of blended materials by compression motdhg at 200 .'C for 3 min follorved by cooling in warer. mixed Pleparation oI samples nÓt€s 2.5 5t 090"c) MMT used was a Ćommelcial Ploduct of Nanocoł USA, octadccylamine modifiec:l montmorillonite Nano- Table 2' 3t.los (ł0oc) 111230't) Polybond 1001, L.rni.oval Polvbond 3200, Lrni.oyal Polybon.l 3150, Uniro)ral preparation jlloni1. il1 a Brabender Methods The composites were ciaracterized by wide angte X-ray diftuaction (WAXS) ln ihe h.ansmission mode and by transmission elecŁron micloscopy oEM). WAXS sys tem consisted of a computel controllcd wid€ anglc goniomcter coupled to a sealed tubc source of CuKaradia tion, operating at 30 kV and 30 mA. The CuKo tine was filtered using eicch.onic fiitedng and the usuat thin Ni filtcr. The slit system that was used for cottecting 2() scans allowed for the cotlection of thc diffracted beam with a divergence angle ofless ihan 0.05 deg. MMT parl .I{'5 Jlone Were dl"o studled b) rĄ ĄXs r,'l .onP lr]"^n Ulhathin sections of ihe films were cryo ulLramicro tomed and studied by means of transmission electron microsĆoPe (TEM) Tesla' RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Dt:2(rOl200 "C Bl:200/2(l(r'C tJl:200/200 "C Dl:2(r0 /200'C Ll1:200/200'C Bl:200/2(r() ''C 57133llr B1:200/201r oC 200't 200 "c 200"c 9(r,10 tll:201r/200 "C lJ2: 1701200 oC A I70lr70 0C tsl:200/200 "C t|H/ PDI B2: 17o /21)O /M6^ |'Pl /Pbl/Nlb]Ż ]'Pl /llJ /Ńlb. 71:21) 6 7+2l 'ó B1 : 200 / 200 ts2: 17A / 2AA ^:170/ "C 0c "C l7A"C TEM examinaiion (Fig. 1) showed a targe amount of exfoliaied monimo llonite in all ĆomPatibilizc.t sys trms, although nanoclay parricles wiih preserved mulrildyercd .truLturF wcre.,1-o nb.crved. Clo>rr cx.rmrna. tion of the micrographs shows rhat the exfotiaiion process starts from the ed8es of montmorillonite parricles ']'ld proCc€o5loń 'lrdc lhc l celltrr.' Such le',tllr' oferlo liation sirongly suggests the importancc of duration and intensity ofmixing and also of inreracrjon htcnsity with r€active comPatibilizers' X-ray diffraciograms of MMT and selected nanocom posites are demonstrated in Fig. 2 and 3. X-ray diffracio, gram of MMT shows a charaĆtelistic peak ai 20 = 3'9 deg, which corrcspolds to spacing of2.2 nm. Thc peaks remained well visible for PPF/MMT composiiions without comPatibi1iŻer' In X_ray diffraĆtoglams of ĆomPati biliŻed systems usually the declease in ihe peak hcight and il_ -hlri toward5 _m'lllcr \ł ue\ ol 2o lr8ll '\;r.' POLIMERY 2004,49, nr 54 1 I rl 13it9 2O,de8 FĘ' 2' X-ruy dit't'ractoyans of MMT and Cnmpatibil1zcd polyprapylcne based na ocomposites uith 3 wt.'1, of (prepnratian 3 as MMT B1)::1- MMT,2 - PPFIPBAIM3N, PPF|PB||M3H,4 PPFlPB2lM3u. Codes ofsanpLes -h Ttbb rcLtte 2 1 L ;6 5 lt , EiS. 1. TEM mirognphs ol canpatibilizcd pallpropVlene bąsed nanocampositcs u,ith MMT: a) PPH|PB1|M6 , b) PPHlPBllM6,\, c) 1'l'NlP81lM6A, Ll) PPLlPBllM6A. Codes of samples as in Tablc 2 observed duc io cxfoliaiion and broadcning of ihc inter- platelet distancc rcsultin8 Irom intcrcalation by compatibilizer an.1 polypropylene chairrs. As it is seen from Fi8' 2 and 3 these effects depend, howeveł on the nanocompositc preparation routc and on composition. ll51I 2 O. deg Fir' 3. X-fi! diflractagafis af comPitibi]Łed po|yłapllene base1l afiocomPasites 70ith 6 wt ' % af MMT łepared usilLs ło tes A and B aru1 PB1 conpatibi|izer: 1 PPNIPB1lM6A, PPLIPBIIM,A,3 PPHIPBIIM'A, 4 ' ppLlpBllM6Br,6 ppHlp81lM682, PPNIPB:LlM6B2,5 7 PPNlPBl.lM6d,8 - PPL|PB||M,N, I 2 PPHlPBllMq . Ca!1es of samples as'in Ttble 2 lcrdiĘ b nNt.IliĆi.|t eYn]lńhon whil. PBA was the woEt anong tn. ońFatibilia6 uscd in this l'olk' as it As itis sccn in Fis. 3 rhc isoh.ri. porypropylcncmolc.ulal weight has no siBnilidnt inaucn.c on ńc exlÓ liaiiolaId inteńlatjon ol M,v'T when the ÓmPolitcs were obbin.d by brcndin! In* polypnpylene \inh a ĆońPatibiljzcr at 170 and then with MMT Goutc t APP'rcndy thediluiionof PÓlyPn,Pyle|swith ]owvis. ^) cous comP ibilizeB signifiĆantly lcducs thc diff.F cnccs bcnvecn rhc porypbpykns by lowc ng their Roub E2, by PĘPalatn]n oI a ms patibili€rand MMTal r70 !c and th en polypnPylene ł 200 oc aPP.aE l bl. ndin8 with Al5o h c ih c no]Ru]ar weĘh t !l PolvPlopy Lcnc Flays littlc rclc in exrolbiion and inrcrcabtion or MMT. This obscrvaiio| i'ldi.ates thł thc lEiion ]d iŃd.alatioń bkes P]i.c du n8 plepłatiÓn oI ł ra*Ćlbakh of MMT tvith .ompalibiliŻei sub selu.nr blcndins of rhc misrcrb .h wirh polvpn)pylc n* iśnot mu.h clfcdivc in lLrdrer calaijon of MMT This k ihe l.asÓn of kN lnf|ucmc oI thc molc 1ł woiBhl Óf pÓlyPloPylcn* on ihc cxfolia_ rig 3 exfoliation _ larB.r Itcd in l$s rfii.ient ładion of non.cxfoliated day Pańi The reslhs obt ined tudi.are that the sequcn.c oI blending plays a oucial role in ńonhorillonłe efolii. tjon in rhese thr@ .omponlnt syś.ńs _ PolyProPylenc' ńontnońllonih and a ońPahb izcr ThP best HulE \'ele obtained by FrePłahon of .ompatibil'er/MvT ń6lmLł1th Iolloved by meli blendilg with a ńr Polypropylcne. A.ryhc a.id grafred polypropylene was found signifiĆandy lcs .ftedi\'. than naleh anhydDdc gmf rPd poryPloPylcncs. obtained \'ben usiĘ Howelri a .omPatibili2er Wilh smaucr .on- ńalci. annydride graIied but shoving highel vk .osity Thk observłńn Poinb out thłt not only lhe inou|t of rłĆtive ErouPs is inpor .o!ty durinB nirins, which influe olshlii Fot hishm vis.ciry l€ shear k baa!ńiit.d to p iicr* mor. cfficicnity T]p innlencc ot the bmpcnruN or the masrerbakh pFpararion also indic ?s rhc Positive effcd oI hiBher li(osjry duliĘ blcndiĘ PrG .!$ o n MMT exlÓliańoń ll thc miśeńa th is prepatd at hlghcr lenPdżfure' .i lowPr vkcosiiy ofa ĆÓń Ient Óf Pahbi]izcł then rhe noholir '. weight 01PolvPloPylenc ma*łbaEh uscd as a marix should be as high as po$ibt. ro cnhancc prePanlion tÓ 200 !c lcd to s]mihllv elli.icŃ !'IÓliatiE in rh!Ćasc of hi!hcrnolc.ulal weĘht.IpDlyPoPyhnc ded to PPH ryPc of porypropylcnc (rcurc B) Howeve!, nr thc case of ppN Thś u,k t?Ś ptlklly nlppaĄ.1 by ! i|d PPL polyprÓPvlĆncs, thc .lfoh ion was les .fii It sl[llifn fuirrh (Polrhl),Tth|]inl t/łi!łśifu,I L."1: o. than in the .łse l'hen rhc ńż*clb .h was Pre rń c. Ę af l\kLa ł i Mr.nh Prredai170oc' haPPeaĄ lhathigh ntl.mlalwei8htof polyprcpvlenc enhancs tosome extlni tlr po,cb ion of polyn!łi. .onPon.nt into 3ł11 RIIIERENCIS tion .f MN'IT p]iicleb duriĘ drc n.It blcndnrs oI lhc ńaśsbakh ind Polypropylene Thc r€n'lh obtaiftd nł PPLind PPFarcesotially $!ril'rb.ouse they sholvsjń a!M.ł PolyProPylen.molc.llarwcight ftcbd aLo the FÓ 3 H6egłw; N, okJDroIo H, (ar sition of p.ak lelatd to MMT inkrplalelĆt diśżn.c, whi.h is beśvisiblc fol nano.onPNilos PĘPar.d ic. .odi'Ę b rhc roub Bl,200.c/200.c'Thc Pcik shift towards Śmallcl 20 Yaluc incrose s.i m , s3. poltproptlenc moleular wcight indi.atin8 ihc broadf the łł a'iĘ of rhc effi.icnt dist .c betrcon day F Ńerablion by PolyproPylcnc llraiN' Usually,