OrIGINaL PaPerS - Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Transkrypt
OrIGINaL PaPerS - Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
original papers Adv Clin Exp Med 2013, 22, 3, 369–375 ISSN 1899–5276 © Copyright by Wroclaw Medical University Barbara Śliwaa–c, Piotr Szelachowskia, c, d, Marta Strutyńska-Karpińskae, f An Analysis of the Impact of Clinico-Pathological Features on Long-Term Results Following Esophagectomy Due to Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Thoracic Esophagus Analiza wpływu wybranych cech kliniczno-patologicznych na wynik odległy w grupie chorych poddanych resekcji przełyku piersiowego z powodu płaskonabłonkowego raka Department and Clinic of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery of Wroclaw Medical University, Poland A – research concept and design; B – collection and/or assembly of data; C – data analysis and interpretation; D – writing the article; E – critical revision of the article; F – final approval of article; G – other Abstract Background. Squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus is one of the neoplasms characterized by an exceptionally latent course, dynamic development and poor prognosis. The stage of the disease at the time of treatment is started the greatest impact on the long term results. Objectives. The aim of this study was to evaluate selected clinical-pathological features as prognostic factors for long term survival among patients who have undergone esophagectomies due to squamous cell carcinoma. The features analyzed were age, gender, the stage of the disease and the type of tumor. Long-term survival rates (2, 5 and 10 years) were analyzed in relation to the particular features. Material and Methods. The study group consisted of 65 patients diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus who underwent esophagectomies between 1997 and 2008. The statistical analysis was performed with Statistca 8.0 software. Gehan-Wilcoxon, chi and Kaplan-Meier tests were carried out. Results. The research did not find any statistically significant correlation between the patients’ gender and survival time (Gehan-Wilcoxon p = 0.83; log-rank p = 0.86). The results showed no statistically significant correlation between the patients’ age and survival time (Gehan-Wilcoxon p = 0.75; log-rank p = 0.47). The only statistically significant impact of the stage of the disease on the survival time was a correlation between the longer survival time and the stage I and II of the disease (Chi p = 0.15). The log-rank test revealed that survival time is significantly shorter in cases of involved nodes (Gehan-Wilcoxon p = 0.054; log-rank p = 0.014). Conclusions. Among the clinical-pathological features investigated, only metastases in regional lymph nodes had any significant impact on long-term survival (Adv Clin Exp Med 2013, 22, 3, 369–375). Key words: squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus, esophagectomy, prognostic factor of long-term survival. Streszczenie Wprowadzenie. Płaskonabłonkowy rak przełyku jest zaliczany do nowotworów o wyjątkowo skrytym przebiegu, dużej dynamice rozwoju i skrajnie niekorzystnym rokowaniu. Faktem jest, że stopień zaawansowania raka przełyku w chwili podjęcia leczenia operacyjnego ma decydujący wpływ na wynik odległy. Cel pracy. Ocena wybranych cech kliniczno-patologicznych jako czynnika prognostycznego przeżyć odległych w grupie chorych po resekcji przełyku z powodu raka płaskonabłonkowego. Analizie poddano takie cechy jak: wiek i płeć, stopień zaawansowania i zróżnicowania raka oraz prześledzono współzależność przeżyć odległych (2-, 5- i 10-letnich) w odniesieniu do poszczególnych cech. Materiał i metody. Badana grupa obejmowała 65 pacjentów z rozpoznanym płaskonabłonkowym rakiem piersiowego odcinka przełyku, którzy w latach 1997–2008 byli poddani operacji resekcyjnej. Wykorzystano następujące testy statystyczne: Statistica 8.0, Gehan-Wilcoxon, Chi, Kaplan-Meier. 370 B. Śliwa, P. Szelachowski, M. Strutyńska-Karpińska Wyniki. Wykazano brak istotnej statystycznie korelacji między płcią a czasem przeżycia (Gehan-Wilcoxon p = 0,83; log-rank p = 0,86). Wykazano brak istotnej statystycznie korelacji między wiekiem pacjenta a czasem przeżycia. (Gehan-Wilcoxon p = 0,75; log-rank p = 0,47). Nie wykazano istotnego statystycznie wpływu stopnia zaawansowania na długość przeżycia, niemniej jednak wyraźnie wykazano korelację między wydłużonym czasem przeżycia a stopniem zaawansowania 1 i 2 (Chi p = 0,15). Za pomocą testu log-rank wykazano istotną statystycznie zależność – zajęcie przez komórki nowotworowe węzłów chłonnych skraca czas przeżycia (Gehan-Wilcoxon p = 0,054; logrank p = 0,014). Wnioski. Biorąc pod uwagę cechy kliniczno-patologiczne wykazano, że jedynie cecha N miała istotny wpływ na wynik odległy (Adv Clin Exp Med 2013, 22, 3, 369–375). Słowa kluczowe: płaskonabłonkowy rak przełyku, resekcja przełyku, czynnik prognostyczny przeżyć odległych. Squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (ESCC) is characterized by an exceptionally latent course, dynamic development and a particularly poor prognosis [1–3]. Similar to pancreatic, lung and liver carcinomas, it has an aggressive course and unfavorable long term results. In most patients with esophageal cancer, treatment is started after dysphagia has already been diagnosed, which implies considerable advancement of the disease. The basic treatment for esophageal carcinoma is a radical resection of the esophagus with a twoor three-field lymphadenectomy [4–6]; however, no proof has been presented so far that two- field lymphadenectomy is sufficient. It also hasn’t been proven that three-field lymphadenectomy is the treatment of choice, i.e., absolutely necessary in every case [5, 7, 8]. Research by Lee et al. indicates that postoperative chemotherapy applied in squamous cell carcinoma patients with lymph node metastases increases the rate of five-year survival after an esophagectomy [9]. They stated that neo-adjuvant therapy in patients in advanced stages of the disease allows more radical resections and contributes to longer survival times [6, 10–12]. Lengthy research seeking specific markers that would allow an early stage of carcinoma to be diagnosed has not been successful. Due to the increasing number of patients with carcinoma of the digestive tract and of the esophagus, researchers are investigating the reasons for unsatisfactory long term survival rates among patients after surgical procedures. The current study looks at multiple clinico-pathological features, tissue markers and circulating markers, surgical methods and multimodal therapy and their impact on long term survival rates. The aim of this article is to analyze selected clinical-pathological features in a group of patients who underwent surgical resection of thoracic esophagus because of squamous cell carcinoma, and to assess the long-term results in relation to particular features. The features analyzed were age, gender, the stage of the disease, the depth of the tumor infiltrate (T) and metastases in regional lymph nodes (N). Material and Methods The research group consisted of 65 patients, both women and men, diagnosed with histopathologically confirmed thoracic squamous cell carcinoma, who underwent esophagectomy in the Clinic of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery at Wroclaw Medical University (Wrocław, Poland) between 1997 and 2001. Detailed information about the research group was obtained from the clinic’s medical records. The stage of the disease was assessed according to the TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors, and histopathological data from the resected esophagus and nodes were taken from the archives of the Department of Pathological Anatomy at Wroclaw Medical University. Further information about the patients was obtained by telephone from the patients or their relatives in 47 cases (72.3%), and from in the Lower Silesian regional authorities in 18 cases (27.7%). The statistical data were analyzed using Statistica 8.0 software. Log-rank, Gehan-Wilcoxon, chi and Kaplan-Meier tests were used for the analysis of the cumulated ratio of survivors, and the Cox test was used for multivariate analysis. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.005. Results The analysis of age and gender revealed that in the research group of 65 patients, in which 76.9% were males, the average age at the time of the resection was 56 years ± 18 years (Table 1). The patients were divided into two groups: those under 56 years of age at the time of the resection, and those 56 years of age and older. The Kaplan-Meier statistical analysis did not reveal any significant correlation between age of the patient at the time of the resection and survival time. According to the Gehan-Wilcoxon test, p = 0.75, and according to the log rank test, p = 0.47. The results are presented in Figure 1. There were 30 patients in the group under 56 years of age; 20 died of them 371 Long-Term Results Following Esophagectomy Due to ESCC Fig. 1. Analysis of survival time relative to age Ryc. 1. Analiza przeżywalności zależnie od wieku Cumulative survival rates Cumulative survival times according to Kaplan Complete Cut Age: < 56 years old ≥ 56 years old Time Cumulative survival times according to Kaplan Complete Cut Fig. 2. Analysis of survival time relative to gender Cumulative survival rates Fig. 2. Analiza przeżywalności zależnie od płci females males Time died during the five-year study period and 10 survived. In the group aged 56 and over, there were 35 patients; 26 died and 9 survived. The Kaplan-Meier statistical analysis did not reveal any statistically significant correlation between gender and survival time after resection. This was confirmed by the Gehan-Wilcoxon test (p = 0.83) and log-rank test (p = 0.86), presented in Figure 2. The research group consisted of 50 men, out of whom 50% survived and 15 women, among whom 39% survived the five-year study period. The values are not statistically significant, so gender cannot be considered a useful prognostic factor in ESCC. The analysis of the stage of the disease stage revealed that in the group of 65 patients, 42 were in stage I to IIA of the disease. The 23 patients with diagnosed metastases in the regional lymph nodes were already in stage IIB or III (Table 2). For the statistical analyses, the research group was divided into subgroups according to the TNM. Theoretical groups were created: Group 1 – T1N0M), Group 2 – T2N0M0, Group 3 T3N0M0, Group 4 – T4N0M0, Group 5 – T1N1M0, Group 6 – T2N1M0, Group 7 – T3N1M0, Group 8 – T4N1M0, Group 9 – T3N1M1. Considering the T and N features in the examined material, no one in the research group qualified for Group 5 (T1N1M0) (Table 2). The survival curves in Groups 1, 2, 3 and 4 were analyzed separately from Groups 6, 7, 8 and 9. Significant differences in the survival times between two group sequences would relate to the N feature – the involvement of lymph nodes – which in the case of Groups 1–4 was N0, while in Groups 6–9 it was N1. Analyzing the T feature – the depth to which the tumor has infiltrated the esophageal wall – by the Kaplan-Meier and chi tests revealed no statistically significant correlation between survival time and the infiltrate depth in the esophageal wall (p = 0.15). Despite a lack of statistical significance, there was a marked tendency for longer survival times in patients in the early stages of the disease (Figure 3). 372 B. Śliwa, P. Szelachowski, M. Strutyńska-Karpińska Table 1. Gender and age classification of the study group (n = 65) Table 1. Płeć i przedziały wiekowe w badanej grupie chorych (n = 65) Age – years (Wiek – lata) 30–39 40–49 50–59 60–69 70–79 total (%) Males (Mężczyźni) (n) 1 7 25 12 5 50 (76.9%) Females (Kobiety) (n) 0 3 7 1 4 15 (23.1%) Total (Suma) (%) 1 (1.5%) 10 (15.4%) 32 (49.3%) 13 (20%) 9 (13.8%) 65 (100%) Table 2. The study group classified by the stage of the disease according to the TNM scale Table 2. Rozkład stopni zawansowania raka w skali TNM w badanej grupie chorych Stage of the disease (TNM) (Stopień zaawansowania choroby) The number of patients (Liczba pacjentów) I – (T1N0M0) 3 IIB – (T1N1M0) 0 IIA – (T2N0M0) 18 IIB – (T2N1M0) 9 IIA – (T3N0M0) 20 III – (T3N1M0) 9 III – (T4N0M0) 1 III – (T4N1M0) 4 IV – (T3N1M1)* 1 * This refers to one patient with thoracic esophagus cancer, in which histopathological examination proved metastases in the subphrenic lymph nodes. * IV T3N1M1 dotyczy jednego chorego z rakiem piersiowego odcinka przełyku, gdzie za pomocą badania histopatologicznego preparatu stwierdzono przerzuty w węzłach chłonnych podprzeponowych (cecha M1). Feature N was evaluated in two groups: Group N0 (n = 42) was node negative, and Group N1 (n = 23) was node positive The Kaplan-Meier analysis in the log-rank test based on cumulative survival rates showed a statistically significant correlation (p = 0.014) between the presence of metastases in regional lymph nodes and lower survival time, as well as a higher survival time in patients with node negative carcinoma (Figure 4). The Gehan-Wilcoxon test results were on the threshold of significance (p = 0.054) confirming the tendency described above despite the small number patients in the group. In the N0 group (n = 42), 17 patients survived; in N1 (n = 23) only 2 patients survived. The impact of the patients’ gender and age of patients and the condition of the regional lymph nodes on the survival times was also analyzed in the Cox test. The results were similar to the Kaplan-Meier analysis presented above. In the multivariate analysis considering the impact of being male (p = 0.99), age under 56 years (p = 0.52) and the involvement of lymph nodes (p = 0.012), only node involvement was statistically significant for shortening survival time. Discussion The subject of this study was an analysis of the impact of gender, age, the depth of the tumor infiltration in the esophageal wall (T) and the condition of the lymph nodes (N) on survival time after a resection. A Kaplan-Meier analysis of survival curves, log-rank test, Gehan-Wilcoxon test, chi test and multivariate analysis based on the Cox test showed that the condition of the lymph nodes has a statistically significant impact on survival time, and that none of the other variables are significant. The results obtained regarding the impact of metastases in the nodes on survival time are the same as the results reported in the literature on the subject. A Japanese study from 2008 showed that node involvement is an independent predictive factor of relapse after esophagectomy: The authors found a correlation between shortened survival time and the presence of metastases in the lymph nodes [13]. In 2010 Japanese researchers proved that the number of regional lymph nodes involved is the most significant prognostic factor in cases of ESCC, and stated that the depth of infiltration of the primary tumor is an important factor responsible for the development of metastases in the nodes [14]. 373 Long-Term Results Following Esophagectomy Due to ESCC Fig. 3. Analysis of survival time relative to the stage of the disease Cumulative survival times according to Kaplan Complete Cut Cumulative survival rates Ryc. 3. Analiza przeżywalności zależnie od stopnia zaawansowania group group group group group group group 1 2 3 6 7 8 9 Time Accumulated proportion of survival time according to Kaplan-Meier Complete Cut Fig. 4. Analysis of survival time relative to N Cumulative survival proportion Ryc. 4. Analiza przeżywalności zależnie od cechy N advanced stage 0 advanced stage 1 Time The recommended treatment in such cases is the excision of as many lymph nodes as possible at the time of resection. There are guidelines as to the exact number of nodes to be removed in relation to the depth of infiltration of the tumor. The importance of the oncological condition of the lymph nodes was also emphasized by Zhang et al., who indicated that the critical factor in survival time is the involvement of a second lymph node [15]. This research, however, does not include an evaluation of the impact of the number of nodes involved because of scarce clinical data and the retrospective character of the study. An earlier study by Tachibana et al. indicated that the ratio of the involved nodes to the number of all examined nodes is significant only in cases of locoregionalstage esophageal cancer and in cases of diagnosed metastases in the cervical and ventral nodes [16]. A 2005 study by Kunisaki et al. also indicated that in ESCC the number of lymph nodes with metastases and the ratio of involved nodes to the number of all examined nodes is a far better prognostic factor than the anatomical approach used in the TNM classification system [17]. Many authors stress the significantly higher prognostic value of the condition of the lymph nodes as compared to the stage of involvement according to the TNM scale [18]. These findings are similar to the current research, which showed no statistically significant correlation between local advancement of the tumor and long-term survival. There are also studies that show the prognostic relevance of the size of the nodes with metastases, as well as the diameter of the focus of the metastases [19, 20]. The presence of metastases in the lymph nodes has recently aroused keen interest among clinicians. Micrometastases may develop into neoplastic tumors, causing relapse and non-response to treatment [21, 22]. In addition to the impact of the condition of the lymph nodes (N) on survival time, the current research investigated the impact of the depth of the tumor’s infiltration in the esophageal wall (T). No statistically significant correlation between 374 B. Śliwa, P. Szelachowski, M. Strutyńska-Karpińska T and survival time. In the literature, opinions as to the relevance of T in the prognosis of ESCC patients following a resection vary greatly. Japanese researchers compared the impact of T and N on survival time and concluded that T, unlike N, does not contribute to the prognosis in this group of patients [23, 24]. Contradictory results have been presented by Chinese researchers: Wang et al. stated that extent of the long axis of the tumor has an impact on survival time after resection. The longer the tumor was, the shorter the survival time was. It should be noted, however, that the results of that study referred exclusively to patients with metastases in the nodes. In cases of no metastases in the nodes, the length of the tumor had no statistically significant impact on the prognosis [25]. The tendencies described above have also been confirmed by British and American authors [26, 27]. According to Australian research from 2011, shallower infiltration (T), a lack of metastases in the nodes (N) and radical esophagectomy are considered oncologically favorable prognostic factors for a five-year survival period [28]. Recent Chinese studies have confirmed those results [29, 30]. The current study also evaluated the impact of the patients’ age and gender on survival time. The analysis did not reveal any statistically significant correlation between age, gender and survival time. These observations are similar to most of the observations presented by other authors [31–33]. However, a 2000 study by Tachibana et al. stated that in cases where there are no metastases in the lymph nodes, only the depth of infiltration, the patient’s age, the duration of the operation and the average blood loss can be statistically significant unfavorable prognostic factors [34]. Similarly, a 2005 study by Neuhof et al. indicated that younger age and female gender are favorable prognostic factors [35]. Evaluating the impact of the gender of patients on survival time, those authors asserted that there is a tendency toward longer survival time in women than in men, although the results were not statistically significant because of the small number of patients in the research group. The current research indicated that only the presence or absence of metastases in the regional lymph nodes correlates with the survival time of squamous carcinoma patients following an esophagectomy. References [1] Holmes RS, Vaughan TL: Epidemiology and pathogenesis of esophageal cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol 2007, 17(1), 2–9. [2] Xu XC: Risk factors and gene expression in esophageal cancer. Meth Mol Biol 2009, 471, 335–360. [3] Sano A, Kato H, Sakurai S, Sakai M, Tanaka N, Inose T, Saito K, Sohda M, Nakayiama T, Kuwano H: CD24 expression is a novel prognostic factor in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2009, 16(2), 506–514. [4] Siewert JR, Feith M, Stein HJ: Esophagectomy as therapeutic principle for squamous cell cancer. Chirurg 2005, 76(11), 1033–1043. [5] Sato M, Ando N: Standard radical esophagectomy in thoracic esophageal cancer. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 2008, 109(1), 21–25. [6] Boone J, Livestro DP, Elias SG, Borel Rinkes IH, van Hillegersberg R: International survey on esophageal cancer: part I surgical techniques. Dis Esophagus 2009 Jan 23. [Epub ahead of print]. [7] Li H, Zhang Y, Cai H, Xiang J: Pattern of lymph node matastases in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus who underwent three-field lymphadenectomy. Eur Surg Res 2007, 39(1), 1–6. [8] Gotohda N, Nishimura M, Yoshida J, Nagai K, Tanaka N: The pattern of lymphatic metastases in superficial squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Hepatogastroenterology 2005, 52(61), 105–107. [9] Lee J, Lee KE, Im Yh, Kang WK, Park K, Kim K, Shim YM: Adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin in lymph node-positive thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 2005, 80(4), 1170–1175. [10] Mariette C, Piessen G, Triboulet JP: Therapeutic strategies in oesophageal carcinoma: role of surgery and other modalities. Lancet Oncol 2007, 8(6), 545–553. [11] Hartwig W, Strobel O, Lordick F, Büchler MW, Werner J: Multimodal therapy of esophageal cancer. Z Gastroenterol 2008, 46(10), 1207–1213. [12] Matsubara H: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for the treatment of esophageal carcinoma. Int J Clin Oncol 2008, 13(6), 474–478. [13] Kunisaki C, Makino H, Takagawa R, Yamamoto N, Nagano Y, Fujii S, Kosaka T, Ono HA, Otsuka Y, Akiyama H, Ichikawa Y, Shimada H: Surgical outcomes in esophageal cancer patients with tumor recurrence after curative esophagectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2008, 12(5), 802–810. [14] Kunisaki C, Makino H, Oshima T, Fujii S, Takagawa R, Kimura J, Kosaka T, Ono HA, Akiyama H: Clinicopathological features in N0 oesophageal cancer patients. Endo I Anticancer Res 2010, 30(7), 3063–3069. [15] Zhang HL, Liu RL, Shi YT, Wang ZC, Wang BH, Li YJ, Zhou LY, Ping YM: Analysis of the survival in patients after surgical resection of thoracic esophageal cancer. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi 2009, 31(7), 541–545. [16] Tachibana M, Dhar DK, Kinugasa S, Kotoh T, Shibakita M, Ohno S, Masunaga R, Kubota H, Nagasue N: Long-Term Results Following Esophagectomy Due to ESCC 375 Esophageal cancer with distant lymph node metastasis: prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node ratio. J Clin Gastroenterol 2000, 31(4), 318–322. [17] Kunisaki C, Akiyama H, Nomura M, Matsuda G, Otsuka Y, Ono HA, Shimada H: Developing an appropriate staging system for esophageal carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 2005, 201(6), 884–890. [18] Zhang H, Ping Y, Du X: Study on factors influencing survival in patients with cancer of the esophagus after resection by Cox proportional hazard model. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi 1999, 21(1), 32–34. [19] Dhar DK, Tachibana M, Kinukawa N, Riruke M, Kohno H, Little AG, Nagasue N: The prognostic significance of lymph node size in patients with squamous esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2002, 9(10), 1010–1016. [20] Komori T, Doki Y, Kabuto T, Ishikawa O, Hiratsuka M, Sasaki Y, Ohigashi H, Murata K, Yamada T, Miyashiro I, Mano M, Ishiguro S, Imaoka S: Prognostic significance of the size of cancer nests in metastatic lymph nodes in human esophageal cancers. J Surg Oncol 2003, 82(1), 19–27. [21] Hosch S, Kraus J, Scheunemann P, Izbicki JR, Schneider C, Schumacher U, Witter K, Speicher MR, Pantel K: Malignant potential and cytogenetic characteristics of occult disseminated tumor cells in esophageal cancer. Cancer Res 2000, 15,60(24), 6836–6840. [22] Li SH, Wang Z, Liu XY, Liu FY, Sun ZY, Xue H: Lymph node micrometastasis: a predictor of early tumor relapse after complete resection of histologically node-negative esophageal cancer. Surg Today 2007,37(12), 1047–1052. [23] Shimada H, Okazumi S, Shiratori T, Akutsu Y, Matsubara H: Impact of lymph node involvement in T2 or T3 thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology 2009,56(93), 1039–1043. [24] Kunisaki C, Makino H, Kimura J, Oshima T, Fujii S, Takagawa R, Kosaka T, Ono HA, Akiyama H: Impact of lymph-node metastasis site in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer. J Surg Oncol 2010, 101(1), 36–42. [25] Wang BY, Goan YG, Hsu PK, Hsu WH, Wu YC: Tumor length as a prognostic factor in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 2011, 91(3), 887–893. [26] Gaur P, Sepesi B, Hofstetter WL, Correa AM, Bhutani MS, Watson TJ, Swisher SG: Endoscopic esophageal tumor length: a prognostic factor for patients with esophageal cancer; M.D. Anderson Esophageal Cancer Group; University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry Foregut Group. Cancer 2011, 117(1), 63–69. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25373. [27] Griffiths EA, Brummell Z, Gorthi G, Pritchard SA, Welch IM: Tumor length as a prognostic factor in esophageal malignancy: univariate and multivariate survival analyses. J Surg Oncol 2006, 93(4), 258–267. [28] Hirst J, Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Thomas J, Barbour A: Defining cure for esophageal cancer: analysis of actual 5-year survivors following esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2011, 18(6), 1766–1774. [29] Zhang DK, Su XD, Long H, Lin P, Fu JH, Zhang LJ, Ma GW, Zhu ZH, Dai Y, Rong TH: Surgical treatment and prognosis in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of thoracic esophagus. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 2008, 46(17), 1333–1336. [30] Hu Y, Zheng B, Rong TH, Fu JH, Zhu ZH, Yang H, Luo KJ, Li YF: Prognostic analysis of the patients with stageIII esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after radical esophagectomy. Chin J Cancer 2010, 29(2), 178–183. [31] Kolh P, Honore P, Gielen JL, Degauque C, Azzam C, Legrand M, Jacquet N: Analysis of factors influencing long-term survival after surgical resection for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Acta Chir Belg 1999, 99(3), 113–118. [32] Yuequan J, Shifeng C, Bing Z: Prognostic factors and family history for survival of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients after surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2010, 90(3), 908–913. [33] Hamouda A, Forshaw M, Rohatgi A, Mirnezami R, Botha A, Mason R: Presentation and survival of operable esophageal cancer in patients 55 years of age and below. World J Surg 2010, 34(4), 744–749. [34] Tachibana M, Kinugasa S, Dhar DK, Shibakita M, Ohno S, Masunaga R, Kotoh T, Kubota H, Nagasue N: Prognostic factors in node-negative squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. Int J Surg Invest 2000, 1(5), 389–395. [35] Neuhof D, Neumayer F, Einbeck W, Haschemian K, Mai SK, Hochhaus A, Willeke F, Rudi J, Debus J, Wenz F: Retrospective evaluation of combined modality treatment and prognostic factors in patients with esophageal cancer. Acta Oncol 2005, 44(2), 168–173. Address for correspondence: Piotr Szelachowski Department and Clinic of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery Wroclaw Medical University Skłodowska-Curie 66 50-369 Wrocław Poland Tel.: +4871 7842752 E-mail: [email protected] Received: 4.07.2012 Revised: 28.09.2012 Accepted: 13.06.2013