ORIGINaL PaPERS - Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Transkrypt
ORIGINaL PaPERS - Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
original papers Adv Clin Exp Med 2013, 22, 3, 355–359 ISSN 1899–5276 © Copyright by Wroclaw Medical University Elisabeth Brunnerc, d, Karla Lehlea, f, Stephan W. Hirta, e, Christof Schmide, f, Marietta von Suesskind-Schwendia, c, d Everolimus’s Influence on Persistent Acute Rejection After Experimental Lung Transplantation* Wpływ ewerolimusu na przewlekłe ostre odrzucenie doświadczalnego przeszczepu płuc Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, University of Regensburg, Germany A – research concept and design; B – collection and/or assembly of data; C – data analysis and interpretation; D – writing the article; E – critical revision of the article; F – final approval of article; G – other Abstract Background. In lung transplantation, acute rejection episodes increase the risk of chronic rejection. Therefore treatment of acute rejection needs to be optimized for better long-term outcome of lung-transplantation and patient survival. Objectives. The aim was to verify whether an inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin (Everolimus) contained the extent of persistent acute rejection after left lung allo-transplantation in rats. Material and Methods. Rats (F344-to-WKY) with a high grade of acute rejection were treated with methylprednisolone (10 mg/kg, postoperative days 14–16) alone or in combination with everolimus (2.5 mg/kg, postoperative days 14–30). The rats were killed on postoperative day 20 and 30. Infiltration of inflammatory cells (ED1, CD11a, CD18) and activation of endothelial cells (ICAM-1) were measured by immunohistochemistry Results. Everolimus treatment significantly reduced the number of ICAM-1 positive small vessels (66%; p < 0.05) and suppressed the infiltration of leucocytes (CD11a (64%), CD18 (42%); p < 0.05) and macrophages (ED1; 22%) in the allografts on POD 30. Despite this clear anti-inflammatory effects, lung allografts still showed severe acute vascular rejection in combination with high grade small airway inflammation. Conclusions. The shown anti-inflammatory effects of Everolimus could not delay the progression of acute rejection in rat lung allografts (Adv Clin Exp Med 2013, 22, 3, 355–359). Key words: lung transplantation, acute lung injury, Everolimus, rats, rejection, inflammation. Streszczenie Wprowadzenie. Ostre odrzucenie przeszczepionego płuca zwiększa ryzyko przewlekłego odrzucenia. Dlatego leczenie ostrego odrzucenia musi być zoptymalizowane, aby osiągnąć lepszy długoterminowy wynik przeszczepienia płuc i przeżycia pacjenta. Cel pracy. Sprawdzenie, czy inhibitor ssaczego celu rapamycyny (ewerolimus) chroni przed trwałym ostrym odrzuceniem po allogenicznym przeszczepieniu lewego płuca u szczurów. Materiał i metody. Szczury (F344-WKY) o dużym stopniu ostrego odrzucania leczono metyloprednizolonem (10 mg/kg, dni po operacji 14–16) samym lub w połączeniu z ewerolimusem (2,5 mg/kg, dni po operacji 14–30). Szczury zabito w 20. i 30. dniu po operacji. Naciek komórek zapalnych (ED1, CD11a, CD18) i aktywację komórek śródbłonka (ICAM-1) mierzono metodą immunohistochemiczną. Wyniki. Leczenie ewerolimusem znacząco zmniejszyło liczbę ICAM-1 dodatnich drobnych naczyń (66%, p < 0,05) i ograniczyło naciek leukocytów (CD11a (64%), CD18 (42%), p < 0,05) i makrofagów (ED1, 22%) w przeszczepach allogenicznych na POD 30. Mimo że allogeniczne przeszczepy płuc były pod wpływem wyraźnego działania przeciwzapalnego, nadal wykazywały ciężkie ostre odrzucenie naczyniowe w połączeniu z zaawansowanym zapaleniem drobnych dróg oddechowych. * SH supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (No. HI-1333). MvS was founded by a grant from University of Regensburg (No. I101-03). 356 E. Brunner et al. Wnioski. Wykazane przeciwzapalne działanie ewerolimusu nie opóźnia rozwoju ostrego odrzucenia przeszczepów płuca szczura (Adv Clin Exp Med 2013, 22, 3, 355–359). Słowa kluczowe: przeszczepienie płuc, ostra niewydolność oddechowa, ewerolimus, szczury, odrzucenie, zapalenie. Lung transplantation (LTx) is the therapy of choice for a variety of end stage pulmonary diseases. Despite advances in immunosuppressive therapy, acute allograft rejection and lymphocytic bronchiolitis still cause chronic allograft rejection, morbidity and mortality [1]. While the standard short-term steroid therapy can contain acute allograft rejection, these patients often develop recurrent acute rejection or persistent rejection. The underlying mechanisms are unknown [2]. Meanwhile, it is clear that immunosuppressive drugs can spare or even induce certain immune cells. Such drug specific effects may be responsible for acute persistent-recurrent rejection [1]. The use of certain immunosuppressants, like mTOR inhibitors (mammalian target of rapamycin, e.g. Everolimus) could optimize transplantation outcome. Today, Everolimus is successfully used to prevent acute and chronic rejection after solid organ transplantation [3]. The authors hypothesized Everolimus [4] should inhibit the progression of persistent acute rejection after left lung allo-transplantation in rats by reducing graft infiltration inflammatory cells (ED1+, CD11a+, CD18+) and by inhibiting expression of the endothelial activation marker ICAM on graft vasculature. Material and Methods In the moderate allogeneic F344-to-WKY (n = 20) rat strain combination, both acute rejection in the short term after LTx (up to postoperative day (POD) 30) and chronic rejection in the long term follow up can be analyzed [5]. Orthotopic left LTx was performed as described earlier [5]. The right lobes remained in the recipient and served as internal controls. The rats were purchased from Charles River (Sulzfeld, Germany; 280±30g). All animals received humane care in compliance with the European Union Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (publication No. 86/609/EWG) and permission from the local authorities was obtained. In order to test treatment options for acute rejection, rats in the control group (n = 10) received intraperitoneal methylprednisolone (MP, Urbason®, Hoechst AG, Frankfurt, Germany; 10 mg/kg body weight) injections on POD 14–16. The rats in the Everolimusgroup (n = 10) additionally received Everolimus (Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland; 2.5 mg/kg body weight, intragastral on POD 14–30). Cohorts of 5 animals each were killed on POD 20 and 30. The right lungs were used as internal controls. The native lungs of non-transplanted rats were used as reference. In addition to conventional histology (H/E staining), immune histological staining of inflammatory and cell adhesion markers (ED1, CD11a, CD18, ICAM-1) was analyzed [6]. All antibodies were purchased from BD Pharmingen (Heidelberg, Germany). Acute rejection was graded according to the ISHLT working formulation [7]. The number of ED1+, CD11a+ and CD18+ cells and the proportion of ICAM-1+ vessels was measured in five high power fields (HPF). ICAM-1 was graded: 1: < 25%, 2: 25–50%, 3: 50–75%, 4: > 75% positive vessels per HPF. The difference between the left and right lung of each animal was used to quantify the drug effect on acute rejection. Statistical analysis (SPSS 16.0.2, SPSS inc, Chicago, IL) included analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a Dunnett T3 post-hoc-test with p-values considered significant below < 0.05. Cell numbers and graded ICAM positive vessels are presented as mean +/– STD per HPF. Results All allografts from both the control group and the Everolimus group showed moderate to severe acute cellular rejection and high grade lymphocytic bronchiolitis (Table 1) on POD 20 and POD 30. The right lungs of the transplanted rats showed normal, non-inflammatory cell numbers. (ED1, 17 ± 1; CD11a, 24 ± 4; CD18, 27 ± 2; proportion of ICAM-1+ vessels, 2.3 ± 0.3). Similar results were documented in the native lungs of nontransplanted rats (data not shown). Allogeneic LTx caused an increased infiltration of inflammatory cells and induced activated endothelial cells in small vessels. The number of inflammatory cells and the proportion of activated vessels in the allografts significantly increased within 20 days after LTx in both groups, without showing a significant difference due to Everolimus (increase in the allograft (vs. right lung): control-group: ED1: 8 ± 2; CD11a, 16 ± 2; CD18, 27 ± 5; ICAM-1: 1.5 ± 0.3; Everolimus-group: ED1: 7 ± 3; CD11a, 19 ± 2; CD18, 28 ± 2; ICAM-1, 1.0 ± 0.7). On POD 30, the inflammatory response remained high in the control group. Continued treatment with Everolimus resulted in a significant decrease in the number of infiltrated lymphocytes (CD11a+ and CD18+ cells, 357 Rat Lung Transplantation and Everolimus Fig. 1. Evaluation of lymphocytic cells (CD11a, CD18), macrophages (ED1) and activated vessels (ICAM-1) during severe acute rejection (POD 30). White column: MP control group, black column: Everolimus group. There was a significant reduction of lymphocytic cells and activated vessels (*p < 0.05, error bar: SEM). Cell number normalized to right (non-transplanted) lung. (ICAM-1 was graded: 1: < 25%, 2: 25–50%, 3: 50–75%, 4 > 75% positive vessels per HPF) Ryc. 1. Ocena komórek limfocytarnych (CD11a, CD18), makrofagów (ED1) i aktywowanych naczyń (ICAM-1) podczas ciężkiego ostrego odrzucenia (POD 30). Biała kolumna: grupa kontrolna, czarna kolumna: grupa leczona ewerolimusem. Stwierdzono istotne zmniejszenie liczby komórek limfocytarnych i aktywowanych naczyń (*p < 0,05; błąd: SEM). Liczba komórek była znormalizowana do prawego płuca (nieprzeszczepionego). (ICAM-1 oceniano: 1: < 25%, 2: 25–50%, 3: 50–75%, 4 > 75% pozytywnych naczyń na HPF) Table 1. Evaluation of acute vascular rejection and lymphocytic bronchiolitis (B) in control and Everolimus groups. Samples were graded according to the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) [7]. (A0: no acute vascular rejection to A4: severe acute vascular rejection; B0: no airway inflammation to B2R: high-grade airway inflammation) Tabela 1. Ocena ostrego naczyniowego odrzucenia i limfocytarnego zapalenia oskrzelików (B) w grupie kontrolnej i leczonej ewerolimusem. Próbki były klasyfikowane według Międzynarodowego Towarzystwa Transplantacji Serca i Płuc (ISHLT) [7]. (A0: brak ostrego odrzucenia do A4: naczyniowe ciężkie ostre naczyniowe odrzucenie; B0: brak zapalenia dróg oddechowych do B2R: zapalenie dróg oddechowych ciężkiego stopnia) Control (Grupa kontrolna) Everolimus (Grupa leczona ewerolimusem) ISHLT-grade (mean) ISHLT-grade (mean) POD 20 A4/B2R (n = 5) A4/B1R-B2R (n = 5) POD 30 A4/B2R (n = 5) A3-4/B1R-B2R (n = 5) p ≤ 0.05) on POD30, as shown in Figure 1. The proportion of activated vessels was significantly lower in the allografts of the Everolimus group (p ≤ 0.05), while the number of alveolar macrophages (ED1) remained unchanged. However, the decrease in the number of infiltrated lymphocytes does not result in a decrease of the ISHLT-scoring of acute cellular rejection and lymphocytic bronchiolitis (Table 1). Discussion Persistent and recurrent acute rejection episodes are major risk factors in lung transplant patients leading to chronic rejection and graft failure. The exact trigger remains unknown. Present data shows that the anti-inflammatory properties of Everolimus cause a significant containment of inflammatory infiltration in allografts after experimental LTx. The relevance of acute rejection as a risk factor for the development of chronic rejection was already shown in the same rat left lung allo-transplantation model (F344-to-WKY) by Hirt et al. [8]. Both early (POD 9–11) and late (POD 14–16) application of a steroid bolus attenuated the extent of acute rejection on POD 20. However, only early therapy suppressed chronic rejection in the longterm follow-up. Late treatment of acute rejection could not prevent the development of extensive vascular fibrosis and bronchiolitis obliterans [8]. However, in experimental rats, late application of MP on POD 14–16 did not affect acute rejection. The reasons for this discrepancy might be breed- 358 E. Brunner et al. ing differences resulting in various sublines of the same rat strain [5]. Hirt et al. used animals from Harlan-Winkelmann and the experimental rats were purchased from Charles River. The source and husbandry history of the animals is important for analysis of immuno-mediated processes [5]. In the present study the authors have used their more stringent model to test the hypothesis that an inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin (Everolimus) can rescue steroid resistant acute rejection. In present model, POD 14 reflects the zenith of acute rejection and simulates a persistent acute rejection [5]. In order to simulate the clinical situation of an occurring acute rejection, the authors started Everolimus therapy on POD14. Moreover, Everolimus should be used with care early after transplantation, since it can cause severe side effects upon surgery (e.g. wound healing complications or weight loss) [10]. In the present model, Everolimus significantly reduced the infiltration of lymphocytes (CD11a, CD18) and reduced the expression of its corresponding endothelial receptor (ICAM-1) in small vessels of lung allografts. The underlying mechanisms might be the suppression of inflammatory mediators (IL6, MCP-1) and T-cell activating cytokines (IL-2, IFN-gamma) [9], as well as the inhibition of the growth factor-stimulated proliferation of lymphocytes [4]. Despite these encouraging findings, this Everolimus treatment did not hinder progression to severe cellular rejection and advanced lymphocytic bronchiolitis in the present model. The histological evaluation of the allografts described an ISHLT-A4/B2R in both groups on both POD 20 and 30. Based on the high grade of acute rejection, the authors suppose that treatment of persistent acute rejection with a bolus of MP and Everolimus could not prevent the development of chronic rejection later on. Similar results were already shown in an earlier study using a monotherapy of Everolimus [10], where the authors could show that only early application of Everolimus reduced the grade of acute rejection and the development of vasculopathy and bronchiolitis obliterans [10]. In conclusion, the anti-inflammatory effects of Everolimus are – even in combination with steroids – not sufficient to delay the progression of acute rejection in lung allografts. Summing up two of authors’ animal studies, they hypothesize that patients would benefit from Everolimus only if therapy is started before the occurrence of rejection episodes. References [1] Zheng HX, Zeevi A, McCurry K, Schuetz E, Webber S, Ristich J, Zhang J, Iacono A, Dauber J, McDade K, Zaldonis D, Lamba J, Burckart GJ: The impact of pharmacogenomic factors on acute persistent rejection in adult lung transplant patients. Transpl Immunol 2005, 14, 1, 37–42. [2] Girnita AL, McCurry KR, Iacono AT, Duquesnoy R, Corcoran TE, Awad M, Spichty KJ, Yousem SA, Burckart G, Dauber JH, Griffith BP, Zeevi A: HLA-specific antibodies are associated with high-grade and persistent-recurrent lung allograft acute rejection. J Heart Lung Transplant 2004, 23, 10, 1135–1141. [3] Gabardi S, Baroletti SA: Everolimus: a proliferation signal inhibitor with clinical applications in organ transplantation, oncology, and cardiology. Pharmacotherapy 2010, 30, 10, 1044–1056. [4] Lehle K, Birnbaum DE, Preuner JG: Predominant inhibition of interleukin-6 synthesis in patient-specific endothelial cells by mTOR inhibitors below a concentration range where cell proliferation is affected and mitotic arrest takes place. Transplant Proc 2005, 37, 1, 159–161. [5] von Süßkind-Schwendi M, Ruemmele P, Schmid C, Hirt SW, Lehle K: Lung transplantation in the fischer 344-wistar kyoto strain combination is a relevant experimental model to study the development of bronchiolitis obliterans in the rat. Exp Lung Res 2012, 38, 3, 111–123. [6] Hirt SW, You XM, Möller F, Boeke K, Starke M, Spranger U, Wottge HU: Development of obliterative bronchiolitis after allogeneic rat lung transplantation: implication of acute rejection and the time point of treatment. J Heart Lung Transplant 1999, 18, 6, 542–548. [7] Stewart S, Fishbein MC, Snell GI, Berry GJ, Boehler A, Burke MM, Glanville A, Gould FK, Magro C, Marboe CC, McNeil KD, Reed EF, Reinsmoen NL, Scott JP, Studer SM, Tazelaar HD, Wallwork JL, Westall G, Zamora MR, Zeevi A, Yousem SA: Revision of the 1996 working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the diagnosis of lung rejection. J Heart Lung Transplant 2007, 26, 12, 1229–1242. [8] Hirt SW, You XM, Möller F, Boeke K, Ernst M, Starke M, Spranger U, Wottge HU: Early treatment of acute rejection prevents chronic rejection in a rat model of allogenic left lung transplantation. Transplant Proc 1998, 30, 4, 1005–1006. [9] Fujishiro J, Pech TC, Finger TF, Praktinjo M, Stoffels B, Standop J, Abu-Elmagd K, Tuerler A, Hirner A, Kalff JC, Schaefer N: Influence of immunosuppression on alloresponse, inflammation and contractile function of graft after intestinal transplantation. Am J Transplant 2010, 10, 7, 1545–1555. [10] von Suesskind-Schwendi M, Brunner E, Hirt SW, Diez C, Ruemmele P, Puehler T, Schmid C, Lehle K: Suppression of bronchiolitis obliterans in allogeneic rat lung transplantation – effectiveness of Everolimus. Exp Toxicol Pathol 2012, 25, in press. Rat Lung Transplantation and Everolimus Address for correspondence: Marietta von Suesskind-Schwendi Tel.: +49-(0)941-944 9901 E-mail: [email protected] Conflict of interest: None declared Received: 20.01.2013 Revised: 15.03.2013 Accepted: 13.06.2013 359