Intelligent Building

Załącznik Nr 5 do Zarz. Nr 33/11/12
Z1-PU7
(faculty stamp)
WYDANIE N1
Strona 1 z 2
COURSE DESCRIPTION
2. Course code: RAr-A-SSII-I-IB
1. Course title: INTELLIGENT BUILDING
3. Validity of course description: 2015/2016
4. Level of studies: BA, BSc programme / MA,MSc programme lub 1st cycle / 2nd cycle of higher education
5. Mode of studies: intramural studies / extramural studies
6. Field of study: Architecture
(FACULTY SYMBOL) RAr
7. Profile of studies: general academic
8. Programme: 9. Semester: I
10. Faculty teaching the course: RAr-3
11. Course instructor: PhD eng. arch. Dariusz Masły
12. Course classification: common
13. Course status: compulsory
14. Language of instruction: English
15. Pre-requisite qualifications:
knowledge on basic terms and issues in the area of public use buildings' design (especially office buildings); knowledge on
basic methods of building quality assessment and architectural programming (briefing)
16. Course objectives:
Students learn ways of briefing, designing and evaluating of intelligent buildings, in particular techniques of application of
technologically advanced building systems in office buildings.
Students learn definitions, terminology, broad, general area of issues relating to "intelligent building", main aspects of
intelligent building quality and ways of its analyzing.
Students gain skills in using techniques and methods of building quality assessment and functional programming of intelligent
buildings.
17. Description of learning outcomes:
Nr
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Learning outcomes description
Method of assessment
Teaching methods
student knows definitions, terminology,
general, basic area of issues relating to
"intelligent building"
student gains broad knowledge on briefing,
designing and evaluating of intelligent
buildings
student gains knowledge on application of
technologically advanced building systems in
office buildings
student is able to propose main design
solutions relating to functional, technical and
behavioural quality of an intelligent building
student understands how proposed technical
and functional solutions influence natural
environment
and
consumption
of
nonrenewable energy sources
written test
lecture
written test
lecture
written test
lecture
written test
lecture
written test
lecture
Learning
outcomes
reference code
K2A-W01;
K2A-W02
K2A-W01;
K2A-W02;
K2A-U06
K2A-W01;
K2A-W02
K2A-U02;
K2A-U03;
K2A-U05
K2A-U07;
K2A-K02
1
18. Teaching modes and hours
Lecture: 30 / BA /MA Seminar / Class / Project / Laboratory
19. Syllabus description:
Following issues are presented:
1. Definitions of Intelligent Building (IB). Main differences between traditional and intelligent building. Periods of development of
an idea of IB.
2. Intelligent building systems: ways of integrating, types of installation buses, placement of building systems.
3. Technical breakthroughs in IB development.
4. Building quality versus organization functioning. Differences between functional and organizational quality. New ways of office
work organizing (free address, drop in, just in time).
5. Flexibility - the main characteristic of IB. Solutions influencing quality of workplace.
6. Efficiency of building area usage.
7. The most technologically advanced IB - examples.
20. Examination: no
21. Primary sources:
1) Masły D. [2009], Jakość budynków biurowych w świetle najnowszych metod oceny jakości środowiska zbudowanego,
Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej, Gliwice.
2) Niezabitowska E. (red.) [2005], Budynek Inteligentny Tom I. Potrzeby uŜytkownika a standard budynku inteligentnego,
Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej, Gliwice.
3) Niezabitowska E. (red.), Mikulik J. [2005], Budynek Inteligentny Tom II. Podstawowe systemy bezpieczeństwa w budynkach
inteligentnych, Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej, Gliwice.
4) Niezabitowska E., Masły D. (red.), współautorzy: Komar B., Kucharczyk-Brus B., Niezabitowska E., Niezabitowski A.,
Niezabitowski M. [2007], Oceny jakości środowiska zbudowanego i ich znaczenie dla rozwoju koncepcji budynku
zrównowaŜonego, Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej, Gliwice.
22. Secondary sources:
1) Baird G., Gray J., Isaacs N., Kernohan D., McIndoe G. [1996], Building Evaluation Techniques, The McGraw – Hill
Companies, Inc., New York.
2) Boyd D. [1994], Intelligent Buildings, Alfred Waller & Unicom, U.K.
3) Duffy F., Greenberg S., Myerson J., Powell K., Thomson T., Worthington J. [1998], Design for Change. The Architecture of
DEGW, Watermark Publications, Birkhauser Verlag, Haslemere, Basel, Boston, Berlin.
4) Hartkopf V., Loftness V., Drake P., Dubin F., Mill P., Ziga G. [1993], Designing the Office of the Future. The Japanese
Approach to Tomorrow’s Workplace, Carnegie Mellon University, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
5) Nelson G. [1995], Architecture of Building Services, Chrysalis Books.
6) Niezabitowska E. (red.) [1998], Jakość Przestrzeni Biurowej, tom1 serii Jakość i zarządzanie w przestrzeni architektonicznej
pod redakcją A. Niezabitowskiego, KOS, Katowice.
7) Preiser W. F. E. [1993], Professional Practice in Facility Management, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
8) Preiser W. F. E., Vischer J. C. (red.) [2005], Assessing Building Performance, Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
23. Total workload required to achieve learning outcomes
Lp.
Teaching mode :
1
Lecture
2
Classes
0/0
3
Laboratory
0/0
4
Project
0/0
5
BA/ MA Seminar
0/0
6
Other
0/0
Total number of hours
Contact hours / Student workload
hours
30/30
30/30
24. Total hours: 60
25. Number of ECTS credits: 2
26. Number of ECTS credits allocated for contact hours: 1
27. Number of ECTS credits allocated for in-practice hours (laboratory classes, projects): 0
26. Comments:
Approved:
…………………………….
(date, Instructor’s signature)
…………………………………………………
(date , the Director of the Faculty Unit signature)
2